Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BPRN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs OCFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BPRN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs OCFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $241M | $588M | $2.35B | $1.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $139M | $251M | $867M | $656M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $19M | $39M | $169M | $71M |
| Gross Margin | 55.8% | 49.1% | 72.1% | 54.5% |
| Operating Margin | 17.0% | 16.1% | 25.3% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 9.8x | 10.4x | 10.8x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $760M | $327M | $1.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $136M | $168M | $185M | $135M |
BPRN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs OCFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Princeton Bancorp, … (BPRN) | 100 | 172.2 | +72.2% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BPRN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs OCFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BPRN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 7.8%, current ratio 561.10x
- Beta 0.73, yield 3.6%, current ratio 561.10x
- NIM 3.3% vs NFBK's 2.0%
- Beta 0.73 vs OCFC's 1.05, lower leverage
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 3.7%
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -16.3%
- 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs BPRN's 49.3%
- PEG 1.53 vs OCFC's 3.57
- Better valuation composite
OCFC is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs OCFC's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.5% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
BPRN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs OCFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BPRN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs OCFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 1 of 6 categories
BPRN leads 1 • NFBK leads 1 • OCFC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 6.2x BPRN's $139M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OCFC's 10.8%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $139M | $251M | $867M | $656M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $61M | $241M | $103M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $19M | $39M | $169M | $71M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | $42M | $225M | $80M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.8% | +49.1% | +72.1% | +54.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +16.1% | +25.3% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +11.9% | +19.5% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +11.9% | +25.2% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +68.8% | +39.5% | -36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BPRN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, BPRN trades at a 33% valuation discount to NFBK's 19.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs OCFC's 5.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $241M | $588M | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $127M | $1.2B | $2.5B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.12x | 19.54x | 13.53x | 16.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.79x | 10.42x | 10.80x | 9.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.13x | — | 1.92x | 5.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.36x | 24.19x | 10.35x | 27.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.74x | 2.34x | 2.71x | 1.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 0.83x | 1.21x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.71x | 19.64x | 10.75x | 13.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BPRN and NBTB each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $4 for OCFC. BPRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFBK's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BPRN scores 8/9 vs OCFC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +5.5% | +9.5% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.7% | +1.1% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +2.0% | +7.9% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.8% | +2.5% | +2.4% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 1.08x | 0.17x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$114M | $592M | $142M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $136M | $168M | $185M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $760M | $327M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.43x | 0.46x | 1.05x | 0.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BPRN five years ago would be worth $13,730 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,018 for NFBK. Over the past 12 months, NFBK leads with a +31.5% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFBK at 18.3% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.4% | +26.5% | +9.3% | +8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.6% | +31.5% | +9.0% | +20.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +55.9% | +65.7% | +54.1% | +55.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.3% | +0.2% | +29.9% | +2.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.3% | +20.6% | +102.2% | +45.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.0% | +18.3% | +15.5% | +15.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BPRN and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BPRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OCFC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFBK currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs OCFC's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 1.00x | 0.89x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.99 | $14.21 | $46.92 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.21 | $9.90 | $39.20 | $16.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +99.0% | +96.1% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 57.0 | 57.3 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 258K | 236K | 662K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and OCFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BPRN as "Buy", NFBK as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 4.2% upside for OCFC (target: $20) vs -4.4% for BPRN (target: $34). For income investors, OCFC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.45% vs NBTB's 3.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.00 | $14.50 | $46.00 | $19.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 9 | 10 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +3.7% | +3.2% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 10 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.26 | $0.52 | $1.43 | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.3% | +3.2% | +0.4% | +7.6% |
NBTB leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BPRN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
BPRN vs NFBK vs NBTB vs OCFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BPRN or NFBK or NBTB or OCFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). Princeton Bancorp, Inc. (BPRN) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Princeton Bancorp, Inc. (BPRN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BPRN or NFBK or NBTB or OCFC?
On trailing P/E, Princeton Bancorp, Inc.
(BPRN) is the cheapest at 13. 1x versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Princeton Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BPRN or NFBK or NBTB or OCFC?
Over the past 5 years, Princeton Bancorp, Inc.
(BPRN) delivered a total return of +37. 3%, compared to +0. 2% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus NFBK's +20. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BPRN or NFBK or NBTB or OCFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Princeton Bancorp, Inc.
(BPRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning OCFC is approximately 45% more volatile than BPRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Princeton Bancorp, Inc. (BPRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 108% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BPRN or NFBK or NBTB or OCFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Princeton Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 74. 8% year-over-year, compared to -29. 1% for OceanFirst Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BPRN or NFBK or NBTB or OCFC?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 10. 8% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 14. 1% for OCFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BPRN or NFBK or NBTB or OCFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Princeton Bancorp, Inc. (BPRN) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 1. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OCFC: 4. 2% to $19. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — BPRN or NFBK or NBTB or OCFC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) offers the highest yield at 4. 5%, versus 3. 2% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB).
09Is BPRN or NFBK or NBTB or OCFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Princeton Bancorp, Inc.
(BPRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BPRN: +49. 3%, OCFC: +45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BPRN and NFBK and NBTB and OCFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BPRN is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.