Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BR vs DSP vs FIS vs TTD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Software - Application
BR vs DSP vs FIS vs TTD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $17.85B | $538M | $24.47B | $11.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.32B | $344M | $10.89B | $2.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.10B | $24M | $382M | $433M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | 45.8% | 38.1% | 77.8% |
| Operating Margin | 17.1% | 3.5% | 17.5% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.1x | 32.5x | 7.5x | 21.2x |
| Total Debt | $3.46B | $22M | $4.01B | $436M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $562M | $191M | $599M | $658M |
BR vs DSP vs FIS vs TTD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadridge Financia… (BR) | 100 | 107.3 | +7.3% |
| Viant Technology In… (DSP) | 100 | 23.7 | -76.3% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.2 | -65.8% |
| The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD) | 100 | 29.2 | -70.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BR vs DSP vs FIS vs TTD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 2.2%
- 194.1% 10Y total return vs TTD's 6.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, current ratio 0.98x
- Beta 0.22, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.98x
DSP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 200.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.4%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4%
- -10.3% vs TTD's -58.4%
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.31 vs TTD's 1.61
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.2x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.61
TTD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 21.2x), PEG 0.31 vs 1.61 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs DSP's 1.45 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -10.3% vs TTD's -58.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 16.2% vs 6.0% |
BR vs DSP vs FIS vs TTD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BR vs DSP vs FIS vs TTD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories
FIS leads 1 • DSP leads 1 • BR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TTD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 31.7x DSP's $344M. BR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%. On growth, DSP holds the edge at +22.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.3B | $344M | $10.9B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.7B | $35M | $3.8B | $693M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $24M | $382M | $433M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | $40M | $2.8B | $837M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.3% | +45.8% | +38.1% | +77.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.1% | +3.5% | +17.5% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +7.0% | +3.5% | +14.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.7% | +11.7% | +26.1% | +28.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.8% | +22.3% | +8.2% | +11.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.1% | +2.6% | +92.3% | -20.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.5x trailing earnings, BR trades at a 66% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DSP offers better value at 1.22x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.8B | $538M | $24.5B | $11.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $20.7B | $368M | $27.9B | $11.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.53x | 32.67x | 63.00x | 25.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.10x | 32.47x | 7.54x | 21.21x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.73x | 1.22x | 2.58x | 1.96x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.30x | 30.49x | 7.66x | 15.54x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.59x | 1.56x | 2.29x | 3.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.81x | 2.73x | 1.76x | 4.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.90x | 10.40x | 9.97x | 14.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TTD leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BR delivers a 40.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. DSP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BR's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BR scores 8/9 vs TTD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +40.1% | +9.1% | +2.7% | +16.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | +5.8% | +1.1% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.2% | +8.4% | +6.0% | +21.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.6% | +3.9% | +6.6% | +19.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.30x | 0.08x | 0.29x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.9B | -$169M | $3.4B | -$222M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $562M | $191M | $599M | $658M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.5B | $22M | $4.0B | $436M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.54x | — | 4.64x | 1591.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DSP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BR five years ago would be worth $10,265 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,552 for TTD. Over the past 12 months, DSP leads with a -10.3% total return vs TTD's -58.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DSP at 40.0% vs TTD's -28.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.2% | +1.4% | -27.3% | -37.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.7% | -10.3% | -35.3% | -58.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.0% | +174.1% | -6.6% | -63.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.7% | -64.3% | -63.2% | -64.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +194.1% | -75.4% | -13.2% | +680.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.3% | +40.0% | -2.2% | -28.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BR and DSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BR is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DSP's 1.45 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DSP currently trades 72.4% from its 52-week high vs TTD's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 1.45x | 0.76x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $271.91 | $16.25 | $82.74 | $91.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $149.05 | $8.11 | $43.30 | $19.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.2% | +72.4% | +57.1% | +25.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 54.5 | 43.3 | 52.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 205K | 5.5M | 20.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BR and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BR as "Buy", DSP as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", TTD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 58.0% upside for TTD (target: $37) vs 31.8% for DSP (target: $16). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BR's 2.22%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $239.60 | $15.50 | $67.38 | $37.12 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 13 | 37 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | — | +3.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 18 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.40 | — | $1.63 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +12.3% |
TTD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FIS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
BR vs DSP vs FIS vs TTD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BR or DSP or FIS or TTD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Viant Technology Inc.
(DSP) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (16. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BR or DSP or FIS or TTD?
On trailing P/E, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. 's 1. 61x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BR or DSP or FIS or TTD?
Over the past 5 years, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) delivered a total return of +2. 7%, compared to -64. 5% for The Trade Desk, Inc. (TTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TTD returned +680. 4% versus DSP's -75. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BR or DSP or FIS or TTD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Viant Technology Inc. 's 1. 45β — meaning DSP is approximately 566% more volatile than BR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Viant Technology Inc. (DSP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 8% versus 130% for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BR or DSP or FIS or TTD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Viant Technology Inc.
(DSP) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viant Technology Inc. grew EPS 200. 0% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TTD leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BR or DSP or FIS or TTD?
The Trade Desk, Inc.
(TTD) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 3% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TTD leads at 20. 3% versus 3. 5% for DSP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTD leads at 78. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BR or DSP or FIS or TTD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus The Trade Desk, Inc. 's 1. 61x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 32. 5x for Viant Technology Inc. — 24. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTD: 58. 0% to $37. 12.
08Which pays a better dividend — BR or DSP or FIS or TTD?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), BR (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DSP, TTD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BR or DSP or FIS or TTD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 2. 2% yield, +194. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BR: +194. 1%, DSP: -75. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BR and DSP and FIS and TTD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DSP is a small-cap high-growth stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TTD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. BR, FIS pay a dividend while DSP, TTD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.