Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BRLS vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD vs CPB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
BRLS vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD vs CPB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $33M | $84M | $1.24B | $1.44B | $6.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $1.51B | $1.45B | $3.03B | $10.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-544M | $91M | $137M | $550M |
| Gross Margin | 9.7% | 20.0% | 34.0% | 27.1% | 29.3% |
| Operating Margin | -46.0% | -31.8% | 14.4% | 10.7% | 12.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 7.5x | 6.9x | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $779M | $304M | $2.29B | $7.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $653K | $54M | $98M | $325M | $132M |
BRLS vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD vs CPB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS) | 100 | 15.5 | -84.5% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 31.4 | -68.6% |
| Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) | 100 | 37.2 | -62.8% |
| Campbell Soup Compa… (CPB) | 100 | 53.2 | -46.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BRLS vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD vs CPB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BRLS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 33.4% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2%
Among these 5 stocks, HAIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SMPL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- 6.3% margin vs BRLS's -65.7%
- 3.7% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs -23.7%
NOMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 7.1%
- 40.1% 10Y total return vs CPB's -44.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 91.8%, current ratio 1.07x
- Beta 0.07, yield 7.1%, current ratio 1.07x
CPB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends and momentum.
- 7.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NOMD's 7.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- -35.4% vs BRLS's -73.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.4% revenue growth vs HAIN's -10.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 9.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs BRLS's -65.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs HAIN's 2.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NOMD's 7.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -35.4% vs BRLS's -73.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs -23.7% |
BRLS vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD vs CPB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BRLS vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD vs CPB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CPB leads in 2 of 6 categories
SMPL leads 1 • NOMD leads 1 • BRLS leads 0 • HAIN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPB is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.0B annually — 359.8x BRLS's $28M. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRLS's -65.7%. On growth, SMPL holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $1.5B | $1.4B | $3.0B | $10.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$430M | $231M | $435M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$544M | $91M | $137M | $550M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | $5M | $174M | $252M | $919M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +20.0% | +34.0% | +27.1% | +29.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -46.0% | -31.8% | +14.4% | +10.7% | +12.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -65.7% | -36.1% | +6.3% | +4.5% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.4% | +0.3% | +12.0% | +8.3% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.6% | -6.7% | -0.3% | -2.6% | -4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.7% | -11.3% | -31.6% | -123.1% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HAIN and NOMD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, NOMD trades at a 22% valuation discount to SMPL's 12.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMPL's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CPB's 7.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $33M | $84M | $1.2B | $1.4B | $6.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $65M | $808M | $1.4B | $3.7B | $13.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.23x | -0.13x | 12.20x | 9.46x | 10.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 7.45x | 6.86x | 9.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.51x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 5.97x | 7.34x | 7.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.19x | 0.05x | 0.86x | 0.40x | 0.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.14x | 0.70x | 0.52x | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 7.86x | 4.85x | 8.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPB delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BRLS. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPB's 1.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CPB scores 7/9 vs HAIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.7% | -164.7% | +5.2% | +5.3% | +14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -31.6% | -36.8% | +3.7% | +2.2% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -62.0% | -23.7% | +8.1% | +5.5% | +9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -83.0% | -29.2% | +9.4% | +6.2% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.64x | 0.17x | 0.92x | 1.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32M | $725M | $206M | $2.0B | $7.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $652,965 | $54M | $98M | $325M | $132M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $779M | $304M | $2.3B | $7.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.28x | -8.60x | 6.77x | 2.52x | 3.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NOMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CPB five years ago would be worth $5,806 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $182 for HAIN. Over the past 12 months, CPB leads with a -35.4% total return vs BRLS's -73.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NOMD at -15.8% vs HAIN's -65.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.0% | -29.8% | -36.4% | -15.4% | -20.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -73.6% | -49.2% | -64.8% | -43.5% | -35.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.3% | -95.8% | -67.8% | -40.3% | -52.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.3% | -98.2% | -64.3% | -59.7% | -41.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.3% | -98.5% | +3.7% | +40.1% | -44.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.3% | -65.3% | -31.5% | -15.8% | -22.0% |
Risk & Volatility
CPB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPB is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CPB currently trades 58.8% from its 52-week high vs BRLS's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.21x | 2.12x | 0.38x | 0.07x | -0.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.05 | $2.22 | $36.92 | $19.71 | $36.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.60 | $0.55 | $10.21 | $9.17 | $19.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +21.8% | +33.2% | +33.7% | +51.3% | +58.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 47.8 | 42.9 | 58.6 | 46.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 290K | 1.2M | 2.8M | 1.6M | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NOMD and CPB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HAIN as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy", NOMD as "Buy", CPB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 21.6% for CPB (target: $26). For income investors, CPB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.20% vs NOMD's 7.06%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.17 | $20.17 | $13.50 | $25.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 | 24 | 13 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +7.1% | +7.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.61 | $1.53 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% | +4.1% | +16.5% | +1.0% |
CPB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). SMPL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
BRLS vs HAIN vs SMPL vs NOMD vs CPB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BRLS or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD or CPB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (6. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BRLS or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD or CPB?
On trailing P/E, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus The Simply Good Foods Company at 12. 2x. On forward P/E, Nomad Foods Limited is actually cheaper at 6. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BRLS or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD or CPB?
Over the past 5 years, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) delivered a total return of -41.
9%, compared to -98. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NOMD returned +40. 1% versus HAIN's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BRLS or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD or CPB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning HAIN is approximately -12133% more volatile than CPB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 185% for Campbell Soup Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BRLS or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD or CPB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus -10. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Campbell Soup Company grew EPS 6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -733. 3% for Borealis Foods Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRLS leads at 26. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BRLS or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD or CPB?
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -91. 5% for Borealis Foods Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -73. 7% for BRLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BRLS or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD or CPB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) trades at 6.
9x forward P/E versus 9. 7x for Campbell Soup Company — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 62. 1% to $20. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — BRLS or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD or CPB?
In this comparison, CPB (7.
2% yield), NOMD (7. 1% yield) pay a dividend. BRLS, HAIN, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BRLS or HAIN or SMPL or NOMD or CPB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Campbell Soup Company (CPB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02), 7. 2% yield). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPB: -44. 9%, HAIN: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BRLS and HAIN and SMPL and NOMD and CPB?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BRLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; NOMD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CPB is a small-cap deep-value stock. NOMD, CPB pay a dividend while BRLS, HAIN, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.