Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BSBK vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BSBK vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $110M | $508M | $2.35B | $1.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $45M | $344M | $867M | $656M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $32M | $169M | $71M |
| Gross Margin | 38.8% | 44.1% | 72.1% | 54.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.6% | 9.0% | 25.3% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | 50.3x | 12.9x | 10.8x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $104M | $1.26B | $327M | $1.63B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $36M | $167M | $185M | $135M |
BSBK vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bogota Financial Co… (BSBK) | 100 | 97.0 | -3.0% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSBK vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BSBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 73.6%, current ratio 1.31x
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.25 vs OCFC's 1.05, lower leverage
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
KRNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.5%
- Beta 0.83, yield 5.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- 5.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +37.9% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 102.2% 10Y total return vs OCFC's 45.4%
- PEG 1.53 vs OCFC's 3.57
- NIM 3.1% vs BSBK's 1.7%
OCFC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 12.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 12.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs OCFC's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.9% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
BSBK vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BSBK vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
BSBK leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • OCFC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 19.4x BSBK's $45M. NBTB is the more profitable business, keeping 19.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSBK's 4.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $45M | $344M | $867M | $656M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $43M | $241M | $103M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $32M | $169M | $71M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$877M | $40M | $225M | $80M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +44.1% | +72.1% | +54.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.6% | +9.0% | +25.3% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +7.6% | +19.5% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +71.5% | +6.2% | +25.2% | +12.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +173.7% | +50.0% | +39.5% | -36.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NBTB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 73% valuation discount to BSBK's 50.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs OCFC's 5.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $110M | $508M | $2.4B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $179M | $1.6B | $2.5B | $2.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 50.29x | 19.24x | 13.53x | 16.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.93x | 10.80x | 9.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.92x | 5.80x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 86.19x | 44.52x | 10.35x | 27.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 1.48x | 2.71x | 1.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.77x | 0.68x | 1.21x | 0.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.03x | 23.76x | 10.75x | 13.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $1 for BSBK. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSBK scores 9/9 vs OCFC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.5% | +4.3% | +9.5% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.2% | +0.4% | +1.1% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +1.1% | +7.9% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +1.5% | +2.4% | +2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.74x | 1.68x | 0.17x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $68M | $1.1B | $142M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $36M | $167M | $185M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104M | $1.3B | $327M | $1.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.08x | 0.22x | 1.05x | 0.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KRNY and NBTB and OCFC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NBTB five years ago would be worth $12,989 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +37.9% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OCFC at 15.9% vs BSBK's 1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.9% | +12.9% | +9.3% | +8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.3% | +37.9% | +9.0% | +20.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.1% | +32.6% | +54.1% | +55.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.2% | -20.5% | +29.9% | +2.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.2% | -9.0% | +102.2% | +45.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.4% | +9.9% | +15.5% | +15.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BSBK and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BSBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OCFC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs BSBK's 90.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 0.83x | 0.89x | 1.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.50 | $8.50 | $46.92 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.82 | $5.76 | $39.20 | $16.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.0% | +95.1% | +96.1% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 55.8 | 57.3 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 298K | 236K | 662K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRNY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRNY as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.45% vs NBTB's 3.17%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $9.50 | $46.00 | $19.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 10 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +5.5% | +3.2% | +4.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.44 | $1.43 | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +7.6% |
NBTB leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
BSBK vs KRNY vs NBTB vs OCFC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSBK or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BSBK or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Bogota Financial Corp. at 50. 3x. On forward P/E, OceanFirst Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BSBK or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
Over the past 5 years, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) delivered a total return of +29. 9%, compared to -20. 5% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NBTB returned +102. 2% versus BSBK's -26. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BSBK or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Bogota Financial Corp.
(BSBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning OCFC is approximately 326% more volatile than BSBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BSBK or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bogota Financial Corp. grew EPS 200. 0% year-over-year, compared to -29. 1% for OceanFirst Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BSBK or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 4. 7% for Bogota Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NBTB leads at 25. 3% versus 4. 6% for BSBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BSBK or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for Kearny Financial Corp. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 17. 6% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BSBK or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC?
In this comparison, KRNY (5.
5% yield), OCFC (4. 5% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield) pay a dividend. BSBK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BSBK or KRNY or NBTB or OCFC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 89), 3. 2% yield, +102. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NBTB: +102. 2%, OCFC: +45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BSBK and KRNY and NBTB and OCFC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BSBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock. KRNY, NBTB, OCFC pay a dividend while BSBK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.