BSLK
Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$59K
5Y Perf.-100.0%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
BSLK vs STEM vs FLUX vs SHLS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
STEM
Stem, Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$74M
5Y Perf.-64.3%
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$23M
5Y Perf.-64.5%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
Solar
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.+20.6%
BSLK vs STEM vs FLUX vs SHLS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | BSLK | STEM | FLUX | SHLS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Software - Infrastructure | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar |
| Market Cap | $59K | $74M | $23M | $1.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $153M | $51M | $536M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $144M | $-6M | $34M |
| Gross Margin | -6.8% | 36.3% | 32.1% | 33.5% |
| Operating Margin | -30.3% | -35.1% | -1.9% | 11.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $369M | $16M | $175M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $49M | $1M | $7M |
BSLK vs STEM vs FLUX vs SHLS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
BSLK
STEM
FLUX
SHLS
| Stock | Jul 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bolt Projects Holdi… (BSLK) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 35.7 | -64.3% |
| Flux Power Holdings… (FLUX) | 100 | 35.5 | -64.5% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 120.6 | +20.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BSLK vs STEM vs FLUX vs SHLS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SHLS leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Stem, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BSLK
Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play
BSLK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: financial services exposure
STEM
Stem, Inc.
The Quality Compounder
STEM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 94.2% margin vs BSLK's -47.6%
- 43.2% ROA vs BSLK's -218.1%
Best for: quality and efficiency
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
FLUX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -69.0% 10Y total return vs SHLS's -74.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick
SHLS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 42.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.08, Low D/E 29.2%, current ratio 2.03x
- Beta 2.08, current ratio 2.03x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SHLS | 19.1% revenue growth vs BSLK's -60.1% |
| Quality / Margins | STEM | 94.2% margin vs BSLK's -47.6% |
| Stability / Safety | SHLS | Beta 2.08 vs STEM's 3.66 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SHLS | +66.5% vs BSLK's -98.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | STEM | 43.2% ROA vs BSLK's -218.1% |
BSLK vs STEM vs FLUX vs SHLS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
BSLK vs STEM vs FLUX vs SHLS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSHLSLAGGINGFLUX
Who Leads Where
SHLS leads in 2 of 6 categories
STEM leads 1 • BSLK leads 0 • FLUX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓FLUXFlux Power Holdings, …
0leads
BSLKBolt Projects Holding…
0leads
STEMStem, Inc.
1leads
SHLSShoals Technologies G…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs STEMvs BSLKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
STEM4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SHLS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SHLS2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $536M annually — 390.0x BSLK's $1M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BSLK's -47.6%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | BSLKBolt Projects Hol… | STEMStem, Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $153M | $51M | $536M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | -$16M | -$212,000 | $73M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $144M | -$6M | $34M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$8M | -$7M | -$77M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +36.3% | +32.1% | +33.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -30.3% | -35.1% | -1.9% | +11.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -47.6% | +94.2% | -12.5% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | -5.5% | -14.7% | -14.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -10.8% | -60.6% | +74.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -142.1% | +27.2% | -25.0% | — |
STEM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BSLK and FLUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | BSLKBolt Projects Hol… | STEMStem, Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $59,200 | $74M | $23M | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $394M | $37M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -0.95x | -3.25x | 39.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 19.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 22.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 0.48x | 0.34x | 2.77x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | — | 2.20x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.82x | — | — |
Evenly matched — BSLK and FLUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — STEM and SHLS each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHLS delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-7 for FLUX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STEM scores 6/9 vs BSLK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | BSLKBolt Projects Hol… | STEMStem, Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -7.4% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | +43.2% | -21.0% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -57.1% | -30.1% | +5.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | -23.9% | — | +7.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | — | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | $320M | $15M | $168M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $49M | $1M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $369M | $16M | $175M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.88x | 14.43x | -2.64x | 5.91x |
Evenly matched — STEM and SHLS each lead in 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHLS five years ago would be worth $2,724 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for BSLK. Over the past 12 months, SHLS leads with a +66.5% total return vs BSLK's -98.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHLS at -26.5% vs BSLK's -93.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | BSLKBolt Projects Hol… | STEMStem, Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -87.1% | -48.6% | -8.5% | -13.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -98.9% | -16.2% | -31.9% | +66.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -89.5% | -66.1% | -60.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -97.8% | -86.4% | -72.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -95.5% | -69.0% | -74.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -93.0% | -52.9% | -30.3% | -26.5% |
SHLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHLS is the less volatile stock with a 2.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHLS currently trades 69.0% from its 52-week high vs BSLK's 0.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | BSLKBolt Projects Hol… | STEMStem, Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.18x | 3.66x | 2.30x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.55 | $32.23 | $7.55 | $11.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.05 | $5.93 | $0.97 | $3.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.4% | +27.0% | +17.2% | +69.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.9 | 51.2 | 57.8 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 155K | 114K | 5.1M |
SHLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STEM as "Hold", SHLS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 137.2% upside for STEM (target: $21) vs 25.4% for SHLS (target: $10).
| Metric | BSLKBolt Projects Hol… | STEMStem, Inc. | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.67 | — | $9.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | — | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SHLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). STEM leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
Best OverallShoals Technologies Group, … (SHLS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
BSLK vs STEM vs FLUX vs SHLS: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BSLK or STEM or FLUX or SHLS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) offers the better valuation at 39. 2x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — BSLK or STEM or FLUX or SHLS?
Over the past 5 years, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) delivered a total return of -72. 8%, compared to -100. 0% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLUX returned -69. 0% versus BSLK's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — BSLK or STEM or FLUX or SHLS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 08β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning STEM is approximately 76% more volatile than SHLS relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — BSLK or STEM or FLUX or SHLS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -60. 1% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to 20. 0% for Flux Power Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLUX leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — BSLK or STEM or FLUX or SHLS?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -47. 6% for Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -30. 3% for BSLK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STEM leads at 35. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is BSLK or STEM or FLUX or SHLS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STEM: 137.
2% to $20. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — BSLK or STEM or FLUX or SHLS?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is BSLK or STEM or FLUX or SHLS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Bolt Projects Holdings, Inc. (BSLK) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLUX: -69. 0%, BSLK: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between BSLK and STEM and FLUX and SHLS?
These companies operate in different sectors (BSLK (Financial Services) and STEM (Technology) and FLUX (Industrials) and SHLS (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: BSLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(BSLK: -60.1% · STEM: -10.8%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.