Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BUSE vs FULT vs NBTB vs IBCP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BUSE
First Busey Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.27B
5Y Perf.+48.5%
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.13B
5Y Perf.+91.3%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.35B
5Y Perf.+43.9%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$699M
5Y Perf.+145.7%

BUSE vs FULT vs NBTB vs IBCP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BUSE logoBUSE
FULT logoFULT
NBTB logoNBTB
IBCP logoIBCP
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$2.27B$4.13B$2.35B$699M
Revenue (TTM)$1.04B$1.89B$867M$315M
Net Income (TTM)$135M$392M$169M$69M
Gross Margin63.9%67.4%72.1%69.6%
Operating Margin17.9%25.7%25.3%25.8%
Forward P/E10.8x10.6x10.8x9.6x
Total Debt$490M$1.30B$327M$117M
Cash & Equiv.$181M$271M$185M$52M

BUSE vs FULT vs NBTB vs IBCPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BUSE
FULT
NBTB
IBCP
StockMay 20May 26Return
First Busey Corpora… (BUSE)100148.5+48.5%
Fulton Financial Co… (FULT)100191.3+91.3%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100143.9+43.9%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100245.7+145.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BUSE vs FULT vs NBTB vs IBCP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FULT leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and recent price momentum and sentiment. First Busey Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. IBCP also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
BUSE
First Busey Corporation
The Banking Pick

BUSE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.

  • 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
  • 3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
Best for: growth and dividends
FULT
Fulton Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

FULT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.76 vs IBCP's 1.82
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • +29.6% vs NBTB's +9.0%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5%
Best for: valuation efficiency
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 184.6% 10Y total return vs FULT's 106.1%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
  • NIM 3.3% vs NBTB's 3.1%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBUSE logoBUSE57.6% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
ValueIBCP logoIBCPLower P/E (9.6x vs 10.8x)
Quality / MarginsFULT logoFULTEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyIBCP logoIBCPBeta 0.83 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage
DividendsBUSE logoBUSE3.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
Momentum (1Y)FULT logoFULT+29.6% vs NBTB's +9.0%
Efficiency (ROA)FULT logoFULTEfficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5%

BUSE vs FULT vs NBTB vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BUSEFirst Busey Corporation
FY 2025
Asset Management
72.5%$69M
Technology Service
20.9%$20M
Other Service Charges On Deposit Accounts
6.6%$6M
FULTFulton Financial Corporation
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
32.8%$85M
Fiduciary and Trust
32.7%$85M
Deposit Account
21.4%$56M
Service, Other
7.7%$20M
Mortgage Banking
5.4%$14M
NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M

BUSE vs FULT vs NBTB vs IBCP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLIBCPLAGGINGNBTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NBTB and IBCP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 6.0x IBCP's $315M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BUSE's 13.0%.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.0B$1.9B$867M$315M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$220M$529M$241M$89M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$135M$392M$169M$69M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$172M$267M$225M$70M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.9%+67.4%+72.1%+69.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.9%+25.7%+25.3%+25.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+13.0%+20.7%+19.5%+21.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.6%+15.0%+25.2%+22.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+28.6%+47.2%+39.5%+2.3%
Evenly matched — NBTB and IBCP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.3x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 43% valuation discount to BUSE's 18.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.74x vs IBCP's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Market CapShares × price$2.3B$4.1B$2.4B$699M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.6B$5.2B$2.5B$764M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.09x10.31x13.53x10.38x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.78x10.61x10.80x9.56x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.74x1.92x1.97x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.62x9.74x10.35x9.39x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.18x2.18x2.71x2.22x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.96x1.13x1.21x1.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.08x14.52x10.75x9.96x
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for BUSE. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FULT's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs BUSE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.7%+11.6%+9.5%+14.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%+1.2%+1.1%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.8%+7.5%+7.9%+10.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.3%+9.5%+2.4%+2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95678
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.20x0.37x0.17x0.23x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$309M$1.0B$142M$65M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$181M$271M$185M$52M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$490M$1.3B$327M$117M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.58x0.84x1.05x0.91x
IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,174 for BUSE. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +29.6% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+13.4%+11.1%+9.3%+7.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+27.6%+29.6%+9.0%+12.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+69.1%+130.4%+54.1%+130.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.7%+41.4%+29.9%+63.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+77.6%+106.1%+102.2%+184.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.1%+32.1%+15.5%+32.1%
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — BUSE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUSE currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 90.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.91x1.13x0.89x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$27.65$22.99$46.92$37.39
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.41$16.60$39.20$29.63
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.2%+93.3%+96.1%+90.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.455.857.350.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded550K2.0M236K176K
Evenly matched — BUSE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BUSE and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: BUSE as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.9% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, BUSE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.84% vs IBCP's 3.05%.

MetricBUSE logoBUSEFirst Busey Corpo…FULT logoFULTFulton Financial …NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$24.00$46.00$38.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1120107
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.8%+3.6%+3.2%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises121211
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02$0.77$1.43$1.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+3.1%+1.6%+0.4%+1.8%
Evenly matched — BUSE and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.

Best OverallIndependent Bank Corporation (IBCP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BUSE vs FULT vs NBTB vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BUSE or FULT or NBTB or IBCP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the stronger pick with 57.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Busey Corporation (BUSE) a "Hold" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BUSE or FULT or NBTB or IBCP?

On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 10.

3x versus First Busey Corporation at 18. 1x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BUSE or FULT or NBTB or IBCP?

Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.

7%, compared to +21. 7% for First Busey Corporation (BUSE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus BUSE's +77. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BUSE or FULT or NBTB or IBCP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

83β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning FULT is approximately 37% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 37% for Fulton Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BUSE or FULT or NBTB or IBCP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is pulling ahead at 57.

6% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -25. 8% for First Busey Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BUSE or FULT or NBTB or IBCP?

Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.

7% net margin versus 13. 0% for First Busey Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBCP leads at 25. 8% versus 17. 9% for BUSE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BUSE or FULT or NBTB or IBCP more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 11. 9% to $38. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BUSE or FULT or NBTB or IBCP?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

First Busey Corporation (BUSE) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 3. 0% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP).

09

Is BUSE or FULT or NBTB or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, FULT: +106. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BUSE and FULT and NBTB and IBCP?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: BUSE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BUSE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 28%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FULT

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NBTB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IBCP

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BUSE and FULT and NBTB and IBCP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BUSE: 57.6% · FULT: 5.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(BUSE: 13.0% · FULT: 20.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(BUSE: 18.1x · FULT: 10.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.