Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BWB vs TCBK vs NBTB vs FBIZ vs MGYR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BWB vs TCBK vs NBTB vs FBIZ vs MGYR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $515M | $1.63B | $2.35B | $473M | $115M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $292M | $533M | $867M | $279M | $58M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $122M | $169M | $51M | $11M |
| Gross Margin | 47.2% | 75.9% | 72.1% | 57.3% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 21.1% | 31.7% | 25.3% | 21.6% | 23.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.0x | 12.0x | 10.8x | 9.1x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $508M | $80M | $327M | $259M | $49M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $124M | $157M | $185M | $31M | $7M |
BWB vs TCBK vs NBTB vs FBIZ vs MGYR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bridgewater Bancsha… (BWB) | 100 | 177.6 | +77.6% |
| TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) | 100 | 179.1 | +79.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 342.7 | +242.7% |
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BWB vs TCBK vs NBTB vs FBIZ vs MGYR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BWB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.0%, EPS growth 45.6%
- 16.0% NII/revenue growth vs TCBK's 1.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5%
TCBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.6% vs BWB's 2.4%
- +33.5% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FBIZ's 2.1%
FBIZ is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 161.7% 10Y total return vs MGYR's 125.8%
- Lower P/E (9.1x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.36 vs 1.53
MGYR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 13.39x
- PEG 0.35 vs NBTB's 1.53
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.7%, current ratio 13.39x
- Beta 0.28 vs BWB's 0.95, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.0% NII/revenue growth vs TCBK's 1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.36 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs BWB's 0.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs FBIZ's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.5% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
BWB vs TCBK vs NBTB vs FBIZ vs MGYR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BWB vs TCBK vs NBTB vs FBIZ vs MGYR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TCBK leads in 2 of 6 categories
FBIZ leads 2 • BWB leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • MGYR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCBK leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 14.8x MGYR's $58M. TCBK is the more profitable business, keeping 22.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BWB's 15.8%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292M | $533M | $867M | $279M | $58M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $65M | $183M | $241M | $49M | $16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | $122M | $169M | $51M | $11M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $124M | $225M | $53M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.2% | +75.9% | +72.1% | +57.3% | +60.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.1% | +31.7% | +25.3% | +21.6% | +23.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +22.8% | +19.5% | +18.0% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.5% | +24.0% | +25.2% | +21.9% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +65.4% | +17.0% | +39.5% | +12.9% | +51.5% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 32% valuation discount to TCBK's 13.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGYR offers better value at 0.35x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $515M | $1.6B | $2.4B | $473M | $115M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $900M | $1.6B | $2.5B | $702M | $156M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.34x | 13.70x | 13.53x | 9.36x | 11.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.99x | 12.05x | 10.80x | 9.15x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.23x | 1.20x | 1.92x | 0.37x | 0.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.91x | 8.52x | 10.35x | 11.61x | 10.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.77x | 3.06x | 2.71x | 1.69x | 1.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.25x | 1.21x | 1.25x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.45x | 12.77x | 10.75x | 7.74x | 11.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCBK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $9 for MGYR. TCBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BWB's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TCBK scores 8/9 vs BWB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +9.4% | +9.5% | +14.1% | +9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +8.9% | +7.9% | +7.0% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +10.8% | +2.4% | +2.6% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.98x | 0.06x | 0.17x | 0.70x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $385M | -$77M | $142M | $229M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $124M | $157M | $185M | $31M | $7M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $508M | $80M | $327M | $259M | $49M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | 1.41x | 1.05x | 0.42x | 0.66x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBIZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,614 for BWB. Over the past 12 months, TCBK leads with a +33.5% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBIZ at 33.2% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.6% | +8.5% | +9.3% | +7.1% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.7% | +33.5% | +9.0% | +21.0% | +25.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +119.6% | +78.3% | +54.1% | +136.5% | +85.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.1% | +21.6% | +29.9% | +130.9% | +73.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +46.7% | +129.4% | +102.2% | +161.7% | +125.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.0% | +21.3% | +15.5% | +33.2% | +22.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NBTB and MGYR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGYR is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BWB's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs MGYR's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 0.93x | 0.89x | 0.81x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.30 | $53.18 | $46.92 | $60.54 | $20.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.35 | $36.32 | $39.20 | $45.90 | $14.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.2% | +95.6% | +96.1% | +93.7% | +88.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 57.2 | 57.3 | 49.1 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 63K | 142K | 236K | 39K | 6K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and FBIZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BWB as "Buy", TCBK as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold", FBIZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.0% upside for BWB (target: $24) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs BWB's 0.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.50 | $57.33 | $46.00 | $67.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 12 | 10 | 10 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +2.7% | +3.2% | +2.1% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 12 | 13 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.14 | $1.38 | $1.43 | $1.19 | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +2.0% | +0.4% | +0.3% | +0.7% |
TCBK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIZ leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
BWB vs TCBK vs NBTB vs FBIZ vs MGYR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BWB or TCBK or NBTB or FBIZ or MGYR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.
(BWB) is the stronger pick with 16. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 8% for TriCo Bancshares (TCBK). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BWB or TCBK or NBTB or FBIZ or MGYR?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus TriCo Bancshares at 13. 7x. On forward P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Business Financial Services, Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BWB or TCBK or NBTB or FBIZ or MGYR?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to +6. 1% for Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBIZ returned +161. 7% versus BWB's +46. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BWB or TCBK or NBTB or FBIZ or MGYR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning BWB is approximately 237% more volatile than MGYR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 98% for Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BWB or TCBK or NBTB or FBIZ or MGYR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc.
(BWB) is pulling ahead at 16. 0% versus 1. 8% for TriCo Bancshares (TCBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 45. 6% year-over-year, compared to 6. 9% for TriCo Bancshares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BWB or TCBK or NBTB or FBIZ or MGYR?
TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
8% net margin versus 15. 8% for Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TCBK leads at 31. 7% versus 21. 1% for BWB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TCBK leads at 75. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BWB or TCBK or NBTB or FBIZ or MGYR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for TriCo Bancshares — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BWB: 27. 0% to $23. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — BWB or TCBK or NBTB or FBIZ or MGYR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 0. 8% for Bridgewater Bancshares, Inc. (BWB).
09Is BWB or TCBK or NBTB or FBIZ or MGYR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 7% yield, +125. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGYR: +125. 8%, BWB: +46. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BWB and TCBK and NBTB and FBIZ and MGYR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BWB is a small-cap high-growth stock; TCBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGYR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.