Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

BWEN vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FSLR vs ENPH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
BWEN
Broadwind, Inc.

Industrial - Machinery

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$49M
5Y Perf.-75.7%
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.25B
5Y Perf.-79.0%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.32B
5Y Perf.-73.9%
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$23.06B
5Y Perf.+121.8%
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.

Solar

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.67B
5Y Perf.-80.0%

BWEN vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FSLR vs ENPH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
BWEN logoBWEN
ARRY logoARRY
SHLS logoSHLS
FSLR logoFSLR
ENPH logoENPH
IndustryIndustrial - MachinerySolarSolarSolarSolar
Market Cap$49M$1.25B$1.32B$23.06B$4.67B
Revenue (TTM)$158M$1.21B$536M$5.42B$1.40B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$-67M$34M$1.67B$135M
Gross Margin10.1%22.4%33.5%41.7%44.2%
Operating Margin0.3%4.5%11.2%33.0%6.8%
Forward P/E9.2x11.8x21.5x12.4x18.0x
Total Debt$28M$766M$175M$499M$1.24B
Cash & Equiv.$456K$244M$7M$2.80B$474M

BWEN vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FSLR vs ENPHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

BWEN
ARRY
SHLS
FSLR
ENPH
StockJan 21May 26Return
Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN)10024.3-75.7%
Array Technologies,… (ARRY)10021.0-79.0%
Shoals Technologies… (SHLS)10026.1-73.9%
First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)100221.8+121.8%
Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH)10020.0-80.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: BWEN vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FSLR vs ENPH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FSLR leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Broadwind, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. ARRY and SHLS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
BWEN
Broadwind, Inc.
The Value Play

BWEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (9.2x vs 18.0x)
Best for: value
ARRY
Array Technologies, Inc.
The Growth Play

ARRY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
  • 40.2% revenue growth vs BWEN's 10.4%
Best for: growth exposure
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.08
  • +66.5% vs ENPH's -18.9%
Best for: income & stability
FSLR
First Solar, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FSLR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 324.1% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
  • PEG 0.40 vs ENPH's 2.86
  • Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ENPH
Enphase Energy, Inc.
The Energy Pick

Among these 5 stocks, ENPH doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthARRY logoARRY40.2% revenue growth vs BWEN's 10.4%
ValueBWEN logoBWENLower P/E (9.2x vs 18.0x)
Quality / MarginsFSLR logoFSLR30.7% margin vs ARRY's -5.6%
Stability / SafetyFSLR logoFSLRBeta 1.39 vs ARRY's 2.32, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SHLS logoSHLS+66.5% vs ENPH's -18.9%
Efficiency (ROA)FSLR logoFSLR12.6% ROA vs ARRY's -4.4%, ROIC 17.6% vs 9.0%

BWEN vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FSLR vs ENPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

BWENBroadwind, Inc.
FY 2025
Heavy Fabrications
63.7%$101M
Industrial Solutions
19.1%$30M
Gearing
17.2%$27M
ARRYArray Technologies, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHLSShoals Technologies Group, Inc.
FY 2025
System Solutions
78.7%$374M
Components
21.3%$101M
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc.
FY 2025
Solar Module
100.0%$15.0B
ENPHEnphase Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.5B

BWEN vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FSLR vs ENPH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFSLRLAGGINGENPH

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 34.3x BWEN's $158M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARRY's -5.6%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$158M$1.2B$536M$5.4B$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M$95M$73M$2.2B$171M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M-$67M$34M$1.7B$135M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$19M$58M-$77M$1.7B$145M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.1%+22.4%+33.5%+41.7%+44.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.3%+4.5%+11.2%+33.0%+6.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.3%-5.6%+6.3%+30.7%+9.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.0%+4.8%-14.5%+30.8%+10.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.4%-26.1%+74.9%+23.6%-20.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.7%-7.0%+65.1%-127.3%
FSLR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ARRY leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.2x trailing earnings, BWEN trades at a 77% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FSLR offers better value at 0.49x vs ENPH's 4.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…
Market CapShares × price$49M$1.3B$1.3B$23.1B$4.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$77M$1.8B$1.5B$20.8B$5.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS9.17x-11.23x39.20x15.10x27.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.83x21.48x12.39x18.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.49x4.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.36x13.50x22.83x9.38x22.19x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.31x0.98x2.77x4.42x3.17x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.73x4.80x2.20x2.42x4.40x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.72x19.42x48.75x
ARRY leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-21 for ARRY. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs SHLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.3%-20.6%+5.7%+18.0%+13.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.2%-4.4%+3.7%+12.6%+4.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital+0.4%+9.0%+5.9%+17.6%+6.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+0.5%+8.2%+7.6%+15.9%+6.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955576
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.43x2.94x0.29x0.05x1.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$28M$522M$168M-$2.3B$769M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$456,000$244M$7M$2.8B$474M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$28M$766M$175M$499M$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.56x-2.42x5.91x53.51x47.60x
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,724 for SHLS. Over the past 12 months, SHLS leads with a +66.5% total return vs ENPH's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs ENPH's -39.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-26.7%-15.3%-13.8%-21.8%+5.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+33.5%+62.7%+66.5%+65.3%-18.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.2%-56.1%-60.2%+20.9%-78.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-56.2%-67.7%-72.8%+187.6%-71.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-36.3%-77.5%-74.7%+324.1%+1737.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-24.1%-24.0%-26.5%+6.5%-39.9%
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FSLR is the less volatile stock with a 1.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs BWEN's 50.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.49x2.39x2.23x1.36x1.69x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.15$12.23$11.36$285.99$54.43
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.45$4.92$3.81$125.80$25.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+50.8%+67.0%+69.0%+75.0%+65.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10038.856.463.264.352.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded164K6.0M5.1M2.1M5.9M
FSLR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ARRY as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy", FSLR as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.6% upside for ENPH (target: $42) vs 11.6% for SHLS (target: $9).

MetricBWEN logoBWENBroadwind, Inc.ARRY logoARRYArray Technologie…SHLS logoSHLSShoals Technologi…FSLR logoFSLRFirst Solar, Inc.ENPH logoENPHEnphase Energy, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$9.67$8.75$251.82$42.41
# AnalystsCovering analysts28237355
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises13
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.0%+0.1%+2.8%
SHLS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

FSLR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallFirst Solar, Inc. (FSLR)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

BWEN vs ARRY vs SHLS vs FSLR vs ENPH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is BWEN or ARRY or SHLS or FSLR or ENPH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN). Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — BWEN or ARRY or SHLS or FSLR or ENPH?

On trailing P/E, Broadwind, Inc.

(BWEN) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Solar, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 86x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — BWEN or ARRY or SHLS or FSLR or ENPH?

Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -72. 8% for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1789% versus ARRY's -76. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — BWEN or ARRY or SHLS or FSLR or ENPH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 36β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 39β — meaning ARRY is approximately 75% more volatile than FSLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — BWEN or ARRY or SHLS or FSLR or ENPH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.

(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus 10. 4% for Broadwind, Inc. (BWEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadwind, Inc. grew EPS 338. 9% year-over-year, compared to 18. 2% for First Solar, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FSLR leads at 25. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — BWEN or ARRY or SHLS or FSLR or ENPH?

First Solar, Inc.

(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -4. 1% for Array Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus 0. 3% for BWEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is BWEN or ARRY or SHLS or FSLR or ENPH more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Enphase Energy, Inc. 's 2. 86x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 9. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENPH: 19. 6% to $42. 41.

08

Which pays a better dividend — BWEN or ARRY or SHLS or FSLR or ENPH?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is BWEN or ARRY or SHLS or FSLR or ENPH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.

(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1789% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1789%, ARRY: -76. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between BWEN and ARRY and SHLS and FSLR and ENPH?

These companies operate in different sectors (BWEN (Industrials) and ARRY (Energy) and SHLS (Energy) and FSLR (Energy) and ENPH (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: BWEN is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

BWEN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ARRY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHLS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 37%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FSLR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ENPH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform BWEN and ARRY and SHLS and FSLR and ENPH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(BWEN: 12.4% · ARRY: -26.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.