Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BY vs MBWM vs MGYR vs MOFG vs FBIZ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BY vs MBWM vs MGYR vs MOFG vs FBIZ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.52B | $898M | $115M | $1.02B | $473M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $629M | $372M | $58M | $206M | $279M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $130M | $89M | $11M | $58M | $51M |
| Gross Margin | 66.1% | 64.0% | 60.3% | 29.4% | 57.3% |
| Operating Margin | 29.1% | 27.5% | 23.6% | -40.8% | 21.6% |
| Forward P/E | 10.3x | 9.5x | 11.3x | 13.8x | 9.1x |
| Total Debt | $565M | $826M | $49M | $117M | $259M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $473M | $7M | $205M | $31M |
BY vs MBWM vs MGYR vs MOFG vs FBIZ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY) | 100 | 274.7 | +174.7% |
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 226.7 | +126.7% |
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| MidWestOne Financia… (MOFG) | 100 | 241.4 | +141.4% |
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 342.7 | +242.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BY vs MBWM vs MGYR vs MOFG vs FBIZ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BY is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 4.0% vs MOFG's 2.5%
MBWM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 178.2% 10Y total return vs FBIZ's 161.7%
- 2.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FBIZ's 2.1%
MGYR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 26.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 13.39x
- PEG 0.35 vs MBWM's 0.63
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.7%, current ratio 13.39x
MOFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +77.6% vs FBIZ's +21.0%
FBIZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.1%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs MOFG's -23.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs MOFG's 1.29 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FBIZ's 2.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.6% vs FBIZ's +21.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs MOFG's 0.7% |
BY vs MBWM vs MGYR vs MOFG vs FBIZ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BY vs MBWM vs MGYR vs MOFG vs FBIZ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MOFG leads in 1 of 6 categories
BY leads 0 • MBWM leads 0 • MGYR leads 0 • FBIZ leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BY and MOFG each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BY is the larger business by revenue, generating $629M annually — 10.8x MGYR's $58M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MOFG's -29.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $629M | $372M | $58M | $206M | $279M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $188M | $107M | $16M | $74M | $49M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $130M | $89M | $11M | $58M | $51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $136M | $11M | $11M | $79M | $53M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.1% | +64.0% | +60.3% | +29.4% | +57.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.1% | +27.5% | +23.6% | -40.8% | +21.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.7% | +23.9% | +16.7% | -29.3% | +18.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +3.0% | +16.8% | +29.5% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | +14.8% | +51.5% | +113.6% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MGYR and FBIZ each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.4x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 19% valuation discount to BY's 11.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MGYR offers better value at 0.35x vs MBWM's 0.63x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $898M | $115M | $1.0B | $473M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $1.3B | $156M | $929M | $702M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.55x | 9.53x | 11.33x | -13.93x | 9.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.34x | 9.54x | — | 13.77x | 9.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.47x | 0.63x | 0.35x | — | 0.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.76x | 11.75x | 10.61x | — | 11.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.41x | 2.42x | 1.96x | 4.94x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.17x | 0.93x | 1.50x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.12x | 80.15x | 11.67x | 16.74x | 7.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — BY and MBWM and MOFG and FBIZ each lead in 2 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $9 for MGYR. MOFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBIZ scores 8/9 vs MOFG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +13.5% | +9.2% | +10.0% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +1.4% | +1.1% | +0.9% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.4% | +5.5% | +6.7% | -9.4% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +8.0% | +2.4% | -9.5% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 1.14x | 0.41x | 0.21x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $505M | $353M | $42M | -$88M | $229M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $473M | $7M | $205M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $565M | $826M | $49M | $117M | $259M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.98x | 0.79x | 0.66x | 0.67x | 0.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MOFG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $23,086 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,109 for BY. Over the past 12 months, MOFG leads with a +77.6% total return vs FBIZ's +21.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MOFG at 39.0% vs MGYR's 22.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | +10.1% | +1.9% | +30.2% | +7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.3% | +23.6% | +25.7% | +77.6% | +21.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.9% | +127.3% | +85.6% | +168.6% | +136.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.1% | +78.4% | +73.1% | +72.2% | +130.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.3% | +178.2% | +125.8% | +109.8% | +161.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.5% | +31.5% | +22.9% | +39.0% | +33.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MGYR and MOFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MGYR is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MOFG's 1.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MOFG currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs MGYR's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.87x | 0.28x | 1.29x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.33 | $55.77 | $20.00 | $49.69 | $60.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.75 | $42.17 | $14.35 | $26.52 | $45.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.2% | +93.3% | +88.4% | +99.2% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 53.1 | 47.4 | 74.9 | 49.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 195K | 112K | 6K | 0 | 39K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MBWM and FBIZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BY as "Hold", MBWM as "Buy", MOFG as "Buy", FBIZ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 19.8% upside for BY (target: $40) vs -36.6% for MOFG (target: $31). For income investors, MBWM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs BY's 1.20%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $57.00 | — | $31.25 | $67.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 7 | — | 8 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +2.8% | +1.7% | +2.0% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | $1.47 | $0.29 | $0.97 | $1.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.0% | +0.3% |
MOFG leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Total Returns. 5 categories are tied.
BY vs MBWM vs MGYR vs MOFG vs FBIZ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BY or MBWM or MGYR or MOFG or FBIZ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BY or MBWM or MGYR or MOFG or FBIZ?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Byline Bancorp, Inc. at 11. 6x. On forward P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Business Financial Services, Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus Mercantile Bank Corporation's 0. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BY or MBWM or MGYR or MOFG or FBIZ?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +130. 9%, compared to +51. 1% for Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MBWM returned +178. 2% versus BY's +77. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BY or MBWM or MGYR or MOFG or FBIZ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. 's 1. 29β — meaning MOFG is approximately 361% more volatile than MGYR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BY or MBWM or MGYR or MOFG or FBIZ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -23. 1% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. (MOFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magyar Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 26. 8% year-over-year, compared to -366. 2% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BY or MBWM or MGYR or MOFG or FBIZ?
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
9% net margin versus -29. 3% for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BY leads at 29. 1% versus -40. 8% for MOFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BY leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BY or MBWM or MGYR or MOFG or FBIZ more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus Mercantile Bank Corporation's 0. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for MidWestOne Financial Group, Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BY: 19. 8% to $40. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BY or MBWM or MGYR or MOFG or FBIZ?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 2% for Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY).
09Is BY or MBWM or MGYR or MOFG or FBIZ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 7% yield, +125. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGYR: +125. 8%, MOFG: +109. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BY and MBWM and MGYR and MOFG and FBIZ?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BY is a small-cap deep-value stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; MGYR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOFG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FBIZ is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.