Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
BYFC vs CARV vs MGYR vs NECB vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BYFC vs CARV vs MGYR vs NECB vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $92M | $9M | $115M | $339M | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $63M | $37M | $58M | $157M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $-13M | $11M | $44M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | 56.3% | 60.3% | 66.1% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | -38.8% | -36.8% | 23.6% | 39.6% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 11.3x | 7.6x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $153M | $29M | $49M | $75M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $50M | $7M | $81M | $185M |
BYFC vs CARV vs MGYR vs NECB vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadway Financial … (BYFC) | 100 | 85.4 | -14.6% |
| Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV) | 100 | 93.8 | -6.2% |
| Magyar Bancorp, Inc. (MGYR) | 100 | 242.5 | +142.5% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 424.0 | +324.0% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYFC vs CARV vs MGYR vs NECB vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.02, yield 3.5%
- Beta 0.02, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.03x
- Beta 0.02 vs NBTB's 0.89
- +52.8% vs NBTB's +9.0%
CARV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MGYR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 26.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 41.3%, current ratio 13.39x
- 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs CARV's -8.3%
NECB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 460.8% 10Y total return vs MGYR's 125.8%
- PEG 0.23 vs NBTB's 1.53
- NIM 4.9% vs BYFC's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (7.6x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.23 vs 1.53
Among these 5 stocks, NBTB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% NII/revenue growth vs CARV's -8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.6x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.23 vs 1.53 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CARV's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CARV's 0.9% |
BYFC vs CARV vs MGYR vs NECB vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
BYFC vs CARV vs MGYR vs NECB vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NECB leads in 4 of 6 categories
BYFC leads 1 • CARV leads 0 • MGYR leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NECB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 23.2x CARV's $37M. NECB is the more profitable business, keeping 28.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BYFC's -39.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $63M | $37M | $58M | $157M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | -$10M | $16M | $63M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | -$13M | $11M | $44M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13,000 | -$9M | $11M | $51M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.9% | +56.3% | +60.3% | +66.1% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -38.8% | -36.8% | +23.6% | +39.6% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.3% | -36.8% | +16.7% | +28.2% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | -34.6% | +16.8% | +32.3% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.8% | -12.2% | +51.5% | +6.8% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
NECB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 44% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.22x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $92M | $9M | $115M | $339M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $234M | -$12M | $156M | $333M | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.05x | -0.63x | 11.33x | 7.54x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 7.62x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.35x | 0.22x | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 10.61x | 5.25x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 0.24x | 1.96x | 2.15x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.32x | 0.29x | 0.93x | 0.95x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 11.67x | 6.67x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NECB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NECB delivers a 13.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-48 for CARV. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CARV's 0.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGYR scores 7/9 vs CARV's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.1% | -48.4% | +9.2% | +13.1% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | -1.9% | +1.1% | +2.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | -13.0% | +6.7% | +12.5% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.6% | -15.4% | +2.4% | +16.2% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.98x | 0.41x | 0.21x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | -$21M | $42M | -$6M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $50M | $7M | $81M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $153M | $29M | $49M | $75M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.87x | -0.71x | 0.66x | 1.17x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NECB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NECB five years ago would be worth $22,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,074 for CARV. Over the past 12 months, BYFC leads with a +52.8% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NECB at 27.6% vs CARV's -27.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.3% | +19.3% | +1.9% | +9.4% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.8% | +18.4% | +25.7% | +10.7% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.9% | -61.3% | +85.6% | +107.8% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.2% | -79.3% | +73.1% | +120.2% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.6% | -53.6% | +125.8% | +460.8% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | -27.2% | +22.9% | +27.6% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BYFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYFC currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CARV's 43.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 0.08x | 0.28x | 0.83x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.86 | $3.85 | $20.00 | $25.61 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.60 | $1.07 | $14.35 | $19.27 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +43.4% | +88.4% | +95.7% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.4 | 50.2 | 47.4 | 50.5 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 4K | 6K | 36K | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NECB and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NECB as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". For income investors, NECB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs MGYR's 1.65%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | — | +1.7% | +4.0% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | — | $0.29 | $0.98 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.7% | +0.5% | +0.4% |
NECB leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BYFC leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
BYFC vs CARV vs MGYR vs NECB vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYFC or CARV or MGYR or NECB or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (7. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYFC or CARV or MGYR or NECB or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 23x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYFC or CARV or MGYR or NECB or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) delivered a total return of +120. 2%, compared to -79. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +460. 8% versus CARV's -53. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYFC or CARV or MGYR or NECB or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning NBTB is approximately 3471% more volatile than BYFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 98% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BYFC or CARV or MGYR or NECB or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magyar Bancorp, Inc.
(MGYR) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -8. 3% for Carver Bancorp, Inc. (CARV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magyar Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 26. 8% year-over-year, compared to -81. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BYFC or CARV or MGYR or NECB or NBTB?
Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -39. 3% for Broadway Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NECB leads at 39. 6% versus -38. 8% for BYFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BYFC or CARV or MGYR or NECB or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 23x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) trades at 7. 6x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — BYFC or CARV or MGYR or NECB or NBTB?
In this comparison, NECB (4.
0% yield), BYFC (3. 5% yield), NBTB (3. 2% yield), MGYR (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CARV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is BYFC or CARV or MGYR or NECB or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
02), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYFC: -37. 6%, NBTB: +102. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BYFC and CARV and MGYR and NECB and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BYFC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CARV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGYR is a small-cap deep-value stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. BYFC, MGYR, NECB, NBTB pay a dividend while CARV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.