Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
BYFC vs NWFL vs NBTB vs CZWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
BYFC vs NWFL vs NBTB vs CZWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $92M | $283M | $2.35B | $203M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $63M | $136M | $867M | $90M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $28M | $169M | $14M |
| Gross Margin | 51.9% | 63.6% | 72.1% | 54.7% |
| Operating Margin | -38.8% | 26.1% | 25.3% | 7.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.9x | 10.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $153M | $74M | $327M | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $44M | $185M | $119M |
BYFC vs NWFL vs NBTB vs CZWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Broadway Financial … (BYFC) | 100 | 85.1 | -14.9% |
| Norwood Financial C… (NWFL) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 291.2 | +191.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BYFC vs NWFL vs NBTB vs CZWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BYFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.02, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.03x
- Beta 0.02 vs NBTB's 0.89
- +52.8% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NWFL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 0.72, yield 4.1%
- Rev growth 34.2%, EPS growth 152.5%
- PEG 1.15 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 3.2% vs BYFC's 2.5%
NBTB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs NWFL's 120.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 11.8x), PEG 1.15 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BYFC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs NBTB's 0.89 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 9-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.8% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs BYFC's 0.9% |
BYFC vs NWFL vs NBTB vs CZWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
BYFC vs NWFL vs NBTB vs CZWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NWFL leads in 2 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • BYFC leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NWFL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 13.8x BYFC's $63M. NWFL is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BYFC's -39.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $63M | $136M | $867M | $90M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | $37M | $241M | $9M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | $28M | $169M | $14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$13,000 | $30M | $225M | $11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.9% | +63.6% | +72.1% | +54.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -38.8% | +26.1% | +25.3% | +7.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -39.3% | +20.4% | +19.5% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.0% | +21.2% | +25.2% | +11.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.8% | +152.6% | +39.5% | +63.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NWFL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, NWFL trades at a 30% valuation discount to CZWI's 14.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NWFL offers better value at 1.31x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $92M | $283M | $2.4B | $203M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $234M | $313M | $2.5B | $136M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.05x | 10.12x | 13.53x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.89x | 10.80x | 11.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.31x | 1.92x | 2.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.56x | 10.35x | 15.28x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.45x | 2.08x | 2.71x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.32x | 1.16x | 1.21x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.79x | 10.75x | 19.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — NWFL and NBTB each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWFL delivers a 12.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-9 for BYFC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BYFC's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWFL scores 7/9 vs BYFC's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.1% | +12.0% | +9.5% | +7.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +1.2% | +1.1% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.7% | +7.3% | +7.9% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.6% | +11.8% | +2.4% | +0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.58x | 0.31x | 0.17x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $142M | $30M | $142M | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $44M | $185M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $153M | $74M | $327M | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.87x | 0.74x | 1.05x | 0.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,685 for BYFC. Over the past 12 months, BYFC leads with a +52.8% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs BYFC's 9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.3% | +11.8% | +9.3% | +21.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +52.8% | +23.9% | +9.0% | +45.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.9% | +33.0% | +54.1% | +160.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.2% | +45.8% | +29.9% | +71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.6% | +120.6% | +102.2% | +157.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | +10.0% | +15.5% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BYFC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BYFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BYFC currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 0.68x | 0.88x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.86 | $32.23 | $46.92 | $22.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.60 | $23.70 | $39.20 | $12.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.8% | +95.2% | +96.1% | +93.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.4 | 50.6 | 57.3 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 21K | 236K | 40K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NWFL and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NWFL as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.6% upside for NWFL (target: $33) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NWFL offers the higher dividend yield at 4.09% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $33.00 | $46.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 10 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +4.1% | +3.2% | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 9 | 12 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | $1.25 | $1.43 | $0.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | +3.1% |
NWFL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
BYFC vs NWFL vs NBTB vs CZWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BYFC or NWFL or NBTB or CZWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the stronger pick with 34. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BYFC or NWFL or NBTB or CZWI?
On trailing P/E, Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, Norwood Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Norwood Financial Corp. wins at 1. 15x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BYFC or NWFL or NBTB or CZWI?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to -33. 2% for Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus BYFC's -37. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BYFC or NWFL or NBTB or CZWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
01β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 88β — meaning NBTB is approximately 10530% more volatile than BYFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 58% for Broadway Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BYFC or NWFL or NBTB or CZWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is pulling ahead at 34. 2% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Norwood Financial Corp. grew EPS 152. 5% year-over-year, compared to -81. 8% for Broadway Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BYFC or NWFL or NBTB or CZWI?
Norwood Financial Corp.
(NWFL) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -39. 3% for Broadway Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NWFL leads at 26. 1% versus -38. 8% for BYFC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BYFC or NWFL or NBTB or CZWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 15x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NWFL: 7. 6% to $33. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — BYFC or NWFL or NBTB or CZWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Norwood Financial Corp. (NWFL) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is BYFC or NWFL or NBTB or CZWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadway Financial Corporation (BYFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
01), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BYFC: -37. 8%, NBTB: +104. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BYFC and NWFL and NBTB and CZWI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BYFC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NWFL is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.