Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CADL vs IMCR vs AGEN vs MGNX vs FATE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CADL vs IMCR vs AGEN vs MGNX vs FATE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $429M | $1.55B | $132M | $186M | $280M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $386M | $114M | $150M | $7M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-19M | $115K | $-75M | $-136M |
| Gross Margin | — | 98.8% | 35.7% | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | -7.6% | -17.7% | -48.7% | -22.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1429.0x | 2.9x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $44M | $10M | $37M | $78M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $120M | $468M | $3M | $57M | $47M |
CADL vs IMCR vs AGEN vs MGNX vs FATE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Candel Therapeutics… (CADL) | 100 | 110.0 | +10.0% |
| Immunocore Holdings… (IMCR) | 100 | 90.4 | -9.6% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 3.7 | -96.3% |
| MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX) | 100 | 12.0 | -88.0% |
| Fate Therapeutics, … (FATE) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CADL vs IMCR vs AGEN vs MGNX vs FATE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CADL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 11.3% 10Y total return vs IMCR's -29.1%
- 310.2% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2%
IMCR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.86
- Rev growth 20.0%, EPS growth 48.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86, Low D/E 11.4%, current ratio 4.04x
- Beta 0.86, current ratio 4.04x
AGEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 0.1% margin vs FATE's -20.5%
- 0.1% ROA vs FATE's -42.7%
Among these 5 stocks, MGNX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FATE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +143.0% vs IMCR's +2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 310.2% revenue growth vs FATE's -51.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.1% margin vs FATE's -20.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +143.0% vs IMCR's +2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs FATE's -42.7% |
CADL vs IMCR vs AGEN vs MGNX vs FATE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CADL vs IMCR vs AGEN vs MGNX vs FATE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IMCR leads in 2 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 1 • CADL leads 0 • MGNX leads 0 • FATE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMCR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMCR and CADL operate at a comparable scale, with $386M and $0 in trailing revenue. AGEN is the more profitable business, keeping 0.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FATE's -20.5%. On growth, MGNX holds the edge at +132.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $386M | $114M | $150M | $7M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$48M | -$27M | -$10M | -$73M | -$148M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$19M | $115,000 | -$75M | -$136M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$39M | -$31M | -$159M | -$83M | -$88M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +98.8% | +35.7% | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -7.6% | -17.7% | -48.7% | -22.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -4.9% | +0.1% | -49.9% | -20.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -8.0% | -139.1% | -55.5% | -13.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +13.6% | +27.5% | +132.5% | -26.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.0% | +157.5% | +85.3% | +8.0% | +38.6% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $429M | $1.6B | $132M | $186M | $280M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $311M | $1.1B | $140M | $166M | $312M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.82x | -57.77x | -1102.94x | -2.49x | -2.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1428.99x | 2.94x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.22x | 1.16x | 1.25x | 42.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.95x | 4.05x | — | 3.34x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMCR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMCR delivers a -4.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-5 in annual profit, vs $-120 for MGNX. CADL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNX's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGEN scores 6/9 vs FATE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -11.7% | -4.8% | — | -120.2% | -65.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.3% | -1.7% | +0.1% | -29.9% | -42.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -17.2% | — | -18.8% | -36.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -52.0% | -4.2% | — | -34.7% | -43.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.11x | — | 0.66x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$118M | -$424M | $7M | -$20M | $31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $120M | $468M | $3M | $57M | $47M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $44M | $10M | $37M | $78M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -2.04x | 1.11x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CADL and FATE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CADL five years ago would be worth $11,129 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $318 for FATE. Over the past 12 months, FATE leads with a +143.0% total return vs IMCR's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CADL at 68.1% vs AGEN's -51.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.2% | -9.4% | +16.1% | +82.6% | +145.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +71.6% | +2.3% | +27.1% | +97.3% | +143.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +375.0% | -48.9% | -88.2% | -59.4% | -55.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | -24.0% | -93.9% | -90.8% | -96.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.3% | -29.1% | -94.3% | -84.4% | +40.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +68.1% | -20.0% | -51.0% | -25.9% | -23.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IMCR and FATE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMCR is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FATE currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.13x | 0.84x | 2.58x | 1.76x | 1.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.99 | $40.72 | $7.34 | $3.88 | $2.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.34 | $27.44 | $2.71 | $1.19 | $0.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.5% | +75.2% | +51.1% | +75.8% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.1 | 55.8 | 48.8 | 45.1 | 81.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 409K | 814K | 1.1M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CADL as "Buy", IMCR as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy", MGNX as "Buy", FATE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1525.5% upside for FATE (target: $40) vs 40.4% for IMCR (target: $43).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $43.00 | $7.33 | $6.00 | $39.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 14 | 11 | 22 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
IMCR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AGEN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CADL vs IMCR vs AGEN vs MGNX vs FATE: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CADL or IMCR or AGEN or MGNX or FATE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Immunocore Holdings plc (IMCR) is the stronger pick with 20.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Analysts rate Candel Therapeutics, Inc. (CADL) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CADL or IMCR or AGEN or MGNX or FATE?
Over the past 5 years, Candel Therapeutics, Inc.
(CADL) delivered a total return of +11. 3%, compared to -96. 8% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FATE returned +38. 2% versus AGEN's -94. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CADL or IMCR or AGEN or MGNX or FATE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Immunocore Holdings plc (IMCR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
84β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 58β — meaning AGEN is approximately 209% more volatile than IMCR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Candel Therapeutics, Inc. (CADL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 66% for MacroGenics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CADL or IMCR or AGEN or MGNX or FATE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Immunocore Holdings plc (IMCR) is pulling ahead at 20.
0% versus -51. 2% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. (FATE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -10. 3% for MacroGenics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMCR leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CADL or IMCR or AGEN or MGNX or FATE?
Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 1% net margin versus -20. 5% for Fate Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CADL leads at 0. 0% versus -22. 2% for FATE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMCR leads at 97. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CADL or IMCR or AGEN or MGNX or FATE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 2. 9x forward P/E versus 1429. 0x for Immunocore Holdings plc — 1426. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FATE: 1525. 5% to $39. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — CADL or IMCR or AGEN or MGNX or FATE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CADL or IMCR or AGEN or MGNX or FATE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Immunocore Holdings plc (IMCR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
84)). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IMCR: -31. 5%, AGEN: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CADL and IMCR and AGEN and MGNX and FATE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CADL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMCR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FATE is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.