Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CARS vs TC vs CARG vs SCI vs KMX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Auto - Dealerships
Personal Products & Services
Auto - Dealerships
CARS vs TC vs CARG vs SCI vs KMX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Internet Content & Information | Auto - Dealerships | Personal Products & Services | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $704M | $21M | $3.77B | $10.89B | $5.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $724M | $37M | $957M | $4.33B | $27.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $-148M | $149M | $626M | $458M |
| Gross Margin | 82.9% | 73.3% | 89.9% | 26.2% | 11.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | -227.6% | 19.7% | 22.4% | 1.7% |
| Forward P/E | 5.8x | — | 15.1x | 18.8x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $468M | $48M | $191M | $5.14B | $19.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $56M | $6M | $191M | $244M | $247M |
CARS vs TC vs CARG vs SCI vs KMX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cars.com Inc. (CARS) | 100 | 200.0 | +100.0% |
| Token Cat Limited (TC) | 100 | 0.6 | -99.4% |
| CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) | 100 | 146.9 | +46.9% |
| Service Corporation… (SCI) | 100 | 199.1 | +99.1% |
| CarMax, Inc. (KMX) | 100 | 45.3 | -54.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CARS vs TC vs CARG vs SCI vs KMX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CARS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 14.8x)
TC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CARG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 6.8%, 3Y rev CAGR -17.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 51.0%, current ratio 2.81x
- PEG 0.85 vs SCI's 3.30
- Beta 0.89, current ratio 2.81x
SCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 1.6%
- 225.6% 10Y total return vs CARG's 38.4%
- Beta 0.11 vs KMX's 1.32
- 1.6% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, KMX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs TC's -69.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 14.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.6% margin vs TC's -403.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs KMX's 1.32 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.6% vs KMX's -39.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.2% ROA vs TC's -72.7% |
CARS vs TC vs CARG vs SCI vs KMX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CARS vs TC vs CARG vs SCI vs KMX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CARG leads in 3 of 6 categories
CARS leads 1 • SCI leads 1 • TC leads 0 • KMX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CARG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KMX is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.4B annually — 747.1x TC's $37M. CARG is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TC's -4.0%. On growth, CARG holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $724M | $37M | $957M | $4.3B | $27.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $152M | -$4M | $218M | $1.2B | $791M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | -$148M | $149M | $626M | $458M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $158M | -$193M | $281M | $629M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +82.9% | +73.3% | +89.9% | +26.2% | +11.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | -2.3% | +19.7% | +22.4% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | -4.0% | +15.6% | +14.5% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.8% | -5.3% | +29.3% | +14.5% | +7.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | -38.8% | +8.2% | +2.1% | -13.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.6% | +58.6% | -8.1% | +65.3% | -46.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CARS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, KMX trades at a 68% valuation discount to CARS's 38.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CARG offers better value at 1.37x vs SCI's 3.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $704M | $21M | $3.8B | $10.9B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $27M | $3.8B | $15.8B | $24.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 38.56x | -1.00x | 24.62x | 20.66x | 12.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.84x | — | 15.14x | 18.79x | 14.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.37x | 3.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.34x | — | 16.64x | 12.01x | 22.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.97x | 2.90x | 4.02x | 2.53x | 0.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.61x | — | 9.87x | 6.83x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.78x | — | 13.06x | 19.65x | 36.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CARG delivers a 41.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $-4 for TC. CARG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.51x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SCI's 3.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMX scores 8/9 vs TC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.7% | -4.5% | +41.9% | +39.4% | +7.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.5% | -72.7% | +23.2% | +3.4% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | — | +36.2% | +11.3% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | — | +30.1% | +5.6% | +3.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | — | 0.51x | 3.14x | 3.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $412M | $42M | $315,000 | $4.9B | $19.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $56M | $6M | $191M | $244M | $247M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $468M | $48M | $191M | $5.1B | $19.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.76x | -60.86x | — | 3.78x | 3.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CARG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SCI five years ago would be worth $15,061 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $102 for TC. Over the past 12 months, CARG leads with a +34.6% total return vs KMX's -39.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CARG at 32.9% vs TC's -62.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.5% | +26.3% | +1.4% | +2.1% | +1.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.0% | -16.2% | +34.6% | +4.9% | -39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.3% | -94.9% | +134.8% | +25.3% | -45.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.8% | -99.0% | +39.5% | +50.6% | -69.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.8% | -99.9% | +38.4% | +225.6% | -22.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.8% | -62.8% | +32.9% | +7.8% | -18.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CARG and SCI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SCI is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KMX's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CARG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs TC's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 0.71x | 0.89x | 0.11x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.97 | $22.46 | $39.42 | $88.67 | $71.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.40 | $6.50 | $26.39 | $74.31 | $30.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +42.5% | +96.8% | +88.5% | +55.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.9 | 29.2 | 60.4 | 37.7 | 47.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 2K | 1.1M | 1.2M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SCI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CARS as "Buy", TC as "Hold", CARG as "Buy", SCI as "Buy", KMX as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.5% upside for SCI (target: $93) vs -5.3% for KMX (target: $38). SCI is the only dividend payer here at 1.64% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $13.00 | — | $37.42 | $93.00 | $37.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 18 | 23 | 9 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | — | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +12.4% | 0.0% | +9.3% | +4.2% | +7.5% |
CARG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CARS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CARS vs TC vs CARG vs SCI vs KMX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CARS or TC or CARG or SCI or KMX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is the stronger pick with 5. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 7% for Token Cat Limited (TC). CarMax, Inc. (KMX) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cars. com Inc. (CARS) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CARS or TC or CARG or SCI or KMX?
On trailing P/E, CarMax, Inc.
(KMX) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus Cars. com Inc. at 38. 6x. On forward P/E, Cars. com Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CarGurus, Inc. wins at 0. 85x versus Service Corporation International's 3. 30x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CARS or TC or CARG or SCI or KMX?
Over the past 5 years, Service Corporation International (SCI) delivered a total return of +50.
6%, compared to -99. 0% for Token Cat Limited (TC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SCI returned +225. 6% versus TC's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CARS or TC or CARG or SCI or KMX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Service Corporation International (SCI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
11β versus CarMax, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning KMX is approximately 1063% more volatile than SCI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 3% for Service Corporation International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CARS or TC or CARG or SCI or KMX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is pulling ahead at 5. 0% versus -69. 7% for Token Cat Limited (TC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CarGurus, Inc. grew EPS 675. 0% year-over-year, compared to -125. 0% for Token Cat Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, CARS leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CARS or TC or CARG or SCI or KMX?
CarGurus, Inc.
(CARG) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 6% net margin versus -382. 3% for Token Cat Limited — meaning it keeps 16. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SCI leads at 22. 6% versus -182. 9% for TC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CARG leads at 89. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CARS or TC or CARG or SCI or KMX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CarGurus, Inc. (CARG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 85x versus Service Corporation International's 3. 30x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Cars. com Inc. (CARS) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 18. 8x for Service Corporation International — 12. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCI: 18. 5% to $93. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CARS or TC or CARG or SCI or KMX?
In this comparison, SCI (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. CARS, TC, CARG, KMX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CARS or TC or CARG or SCI or KMX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Service Corporation International (SCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
11), 1. 6% yield, +225. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCI: +225. 6%, KMX: -22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CARS and TC and CARG and SCI and KMX?
These companies operate in different sectors (CARS (Consumer Cyclical) and TC (Communication Services) and CARG (Consumer Cyclical) and SCI (Consumer Cyclical) and KMX (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CARS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CARG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SCI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KMX is a small-cap deep-value stock. SCI pays a dividend while CARS, TC, CARG, KMX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.