Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CASH vs NAVI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
CASH vs NAVI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $1.91B | $826M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $685M | $3.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $191M | $-60M |
| Gross Margin | 90.0% | 87.0% |
| Operating Margin | 32.6% | 77.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $45.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $121M | $2.10B |
CASH vs NAVI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathward Financial,… (CASH) | 100 | 483.2 | +383.2% |
| Navient Corporation (NAVI) | 100 | 118.1 | +18.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CASH vs NAVI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CASH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.4%, EPS growth 9.3%
- 451.0% 10Y total return vs NAVI's 15.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, Low D/E 5.0%, current ratio 0.22x
NAVI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 7.2%
- Beta 0.92, yield 7.2%, current ratio 0.41x
- Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CASH's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.4% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 12.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CASH's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs NAVI's 0.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CASH's 0.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.0% vs NAVI's -25.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs CASH's 0.6% |
CASH vs NAVI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CASH vs NAVI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CASH leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NAVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 4.7x CASH's $685M. CASH is the more profitable business, keeping 27.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVI's -2.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $685M | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $288M | $544M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $191M | -$60M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $422M | $323M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.0% | +87.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.6% | +77.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +27.1% | -2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +13.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.6% | +9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NAVI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CASH's 6.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAVI's 17.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.9B | $826M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $44.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.12x | -10.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.09x | 12.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.46x | 17.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.78x | 0.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.40x | 0.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.05x | 1.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CASH leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CASH delivers a 22.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. CASH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASH scores 8/9 vs NAVI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.9% | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.6% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.6% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.3% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 19.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$78M | $43.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $121M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $45.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 22.12x | 0.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CASH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CASH five years ago would be worth $17,636 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,915 for NAVI. Over the past 12 months, CASH leads with a +7.0% total return vs NAVI's -25.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CASH at 26.7% vs NAVI's -10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.9% | -30.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.0% | -25.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.4% | -27.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.4% | -30.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +451.0% | +15.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.7% | -10.3% |
Risk & Volatility
CASH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CASH is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NAVI's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASH currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs NAVI's 54.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $101.26 | $16.07 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $65.87 | $7.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.5% | +54.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.8 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 217K | 923K |
Analyst Outlook
NAVI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CASH as "Buy" and NAVI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -1.4% upside for NAVI (target: $9) vs -6.3% for CASH (target: $82). For income investors, NAVI offers the higher dividend yield at 7.24% vs CASH's 0.23%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $82.00 | $8.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +7.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.20 | $0.64 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.6% | +13.4% |
CASH leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NAVI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
CASH vs NAVI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CASH or NAVI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pathward Financial, Inc.
(CASH) is the stronger pick with 2. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH) offers the better valuation at 11. 1x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CASH or NAVI?
On forward P/E, Pathward Financial, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 10. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CASH or NAVI?
Over the past 5 years, Pathward Financial, Inc.
(CASH) delivered a total return of +76. 4%, compared to -30. 9% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CASH returned +451. 0% versus NAVI's +15. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CASH or NAVI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pathward Financial, Inc.
(CASH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 87β versus Navient Corporation's 0. 92β — meaning NAVI is approximately 6% more volatile than CASH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CASH or NAVI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pathward Financial, Inc.
(CASH) is pulling ahead at 2. 4% versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Pathward Financial, Inc. grew EPS 9. 3% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CASH or NAVI?
Pathward Financial, Inc.
(CASH) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 1% net margin versus -2. 5% for Navient Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAVI leads at 77. 1% versus 32. 6% for CASH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CASH leads at 90. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CASH or NAVI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Pathward Financial, Inc.
(CASH) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Navient Corporation — 2. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NAVI: -1. 4% to $8. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CASH or NAVI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Navient Corporation (NAVI) offers the highest yield at 7. 2%, versus 0. 2% for Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH).
09Is CASH or NAVI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
92), 7. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NAVI: +15. 3%, CASH: +451. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CASH and NAVI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CASH is a small-cap deep-value stock; NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NAVI pays a dividend while CASH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.