Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CATY vs RBB vs HAFC vs EWBC vs HOPE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Regional
CATY vs RBB vs HAFC vs EWBC vs HOPE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.82B | $412M | $908M | $16.78B | $1.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.38B | $232M | $445M | $4.69B | $968M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $315M | $26M | $76M | $1.33B | $59M |
| Gross Margin | 55.1% | 45.2% | 57.5% | 60.1% | 48.6% |
| Operating Margin | 29.4% | 15.4% | 24.3% | 37.4% | 8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.4x | 10.4x | 9.6x | 11.5x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $209M | $364M | $280M | $3.17B | $396M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $146M | $258M | $213M | $656M | $560M |
CATY vs RBB vs HAFC vs EWBC vs HOPE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cathay General Banc… (CATY) | 100 | 209.6 | +109.6% |
| RBB Bancorp (RBB) | 100 | 188.5 | +88.5% |
| Hanmi Financial Cor… (HAFC) | 100 | 336.4 | +236.4% |
| East West Bancorp, … (EWBC) | 100 | 348.9 | +248.9% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CATY vs RBB vs HAFC vs EWBC vs HOPE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, CATY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RBB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +57.0% vs HOPE's +30.4%
HAFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 3.6%
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth 22.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 35.2%, current ratio 49.21x
- Beta 0.92, yield 3.6%, current ratio 49.21x
EWBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 281.4% 10Y total return vs CATY's 137.4%
- PEG 0.60 vs CATY's 1.09
- NIM 3.2% vs RBB's 2.5%
- 4.6% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
HOPE is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs CATY's 2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.6% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs HOPE's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.92 vs EWBC's 1.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs CATY's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.0% vs HOPE's +30.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs HOPE's 0.4% |
CATY vs RBB vs HAFC vs EWBC vs HOPE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CATY vs RBB vs HAFC vs EWBC vs HOPE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EWBC leads in 3 of 6 categories
HAFC leads 1 • CATY leads 0 • RBB leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EWBC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EWBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 20.2x RBB's $232M. EWBC is the more profitable business, keeping 28.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.4B | $232M | $445M | $4.7B | $968M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $431M | $43M | $110M | $2.0B | $84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $315M | $26M | $76M | $1.3B | $59M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $357M | $48M | $204M | $1.5B | $147M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.1% | +45.2% | +57.5% | +60.1% | +48.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.4% | +15.4% | +24.3% | +37.4% | +8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +11.5% | +17.1% | +28.3% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +24.9% | +45.8% | +32.0% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | +51.3% | +20.7% | +21.4% | +35.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HAFC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, HAFC trades at a 56% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EWBC offers better value at 0.67x vs CATY's 1.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.8B | $412M | $908M | $16.8B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.9B | $518M | $976M | $19.3B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.55x | 16.46x | 12.10x | 12.81x | 27.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.43x | 10.42x | 9.61x | 11.47x | 11.70x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.31x | — | 0.95x | 0.67x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.00x | 11.54x | 8.59x | 9.49x | 17.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.76x | 1.78x | 2.04x | 3.58x | 1.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.32x | 0.87x | 1.15x | 1.91x | 0.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.50x | 7.14x | 4.46x | 11.17x | 10.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EWBC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EWBC delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. CATY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RBB's 0.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HAFC scores 9/9 vs RBB's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | +5.1% | +9.8% | +15.8% | +2.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +0.6% | +1.0% | +1.7% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.8% | +3.2% | +7.4% | +11.2% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.5% | +4.1% | +2.5% | +3.9% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.72x | 0.35x | 0.36x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $63M | $106M | $68M | $2.5B | -$164M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $146M | $258M | $213M | $656M | $560M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $209M | $364M | $280M | $3.2B | $396M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.72x | 0.31x | 0.62x | 1.01x | 0.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EWBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EWBC five years ago would be worth $16,812 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,800 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, RBB leads with a +57.0% total return vs HOPE's +30.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EWBC at 42.2% vs HOPE's 21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.9% | +19.7% | +15.2% | +7.4% | +15.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.5% | +57.0% | +36.9% | +42.7% | +30.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.0% | +186.0% | +137.2% | +187.3% | +80.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.2% | +21.4% | +64.7% | +68.1% | -2.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +137.4% | +22.7% | +76.5% | +281.4% | +18.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.3% | +41.9% | +33.4% | +42.2% | +21.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CATY and HAFC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAFC is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EWBC's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 0.98x | 0.92x | 1.22x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $58.00 | $24.70 | $31.27 | $127.52 | $13.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $41.64 | $15.59 | $21.84 | $86.58 | $9.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.3% | +97.9% | +97.2% | +95.6% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.8 | 65.5 | 64.1 | 66.3 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 465K | 78K | 265K | 1.0M | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CATY and HOPE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CATY as "Hold", RBB as "Hold", HAFC as "Hold", EWBC as "Buy", HOPE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for HOPE (target: $15) vs -17.5% for CATY (target: $47). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.39% vs EWBC's 1.97%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $47.00 | $22.00 | $35.00 | $130.67 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 6 | 11 | 24 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +2.7% | +3.6% | +2.0% | +4.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.38 | $0.64 | $1.09 | $2.40 | $0.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.7% | +5.0% | +1.0% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
EWBC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HAFC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CATY vs RBB vs HAFC vs EWBC vs HOPE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CATY or RBB or HAFC or EWBC or HOPE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the stronger pick with 4. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CATY or RBB or HAFC or EWBC or HOPE?
On trailing P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Hanmi Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: East West Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 60x versus Cathay General Bancorp's 1. 09x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CATY or RBB or HAFC or EWBC or HOPE?
Over the past 5 years, East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) delivered a total return of +68. 1%, compared to -2. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EWBC returned +281. 4% versus HOPE's +18. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CATY or RBB or HAFC or EWBC or HOPE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
92β versus East West Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning EWBC is approximately 32% more volatile than HAFC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cathay General Bancorp (CATY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 72% for RBB Bancorp — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CATY or RBB or HAFC or EWBC or HOPE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is pulling ahead at 4. 6% versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hanmi Financial Corporation grew EPS 22. 4% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CATY or RBB or HAFC or EWBC or HOPE?
East West Bancorp, Inc.
(EWBC) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 3% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EWBC leads at 37. 4% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EWBC leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CATY or RBB or HAFC or EWBC or HOPE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 60x versus Cathay General Bancorp's 1. 09x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 11. 7x for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOPE: 15. 8% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CATY or RBB or HAFC or EWBC or HOPE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 2. 0% for East West Bancorp, Inc. (EWBC).
09Is CATY or RBB or HAFC or EWBC or HOPE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hanmi Financial Corporation (HAFC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
92), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAFC: +76. 5%, HOPE: +18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CATY and RBB and HAFC and EWBC and HOPE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CATY is a small-cap deep-value stock; RBB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; EWBC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.