Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CAVA vs CMG vs SG vs SHAK vs BROS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CAVA
CAVA Group, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.82B
5Y Perf.+106.4%
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$43.33B
5Y Perf.-22.2%
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$816M
5Y Perf.-46.4%
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.79B
5Y Perf.-10.9%
BROS
Dutch Bros Inc.

Restaurants

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.81B
5Y Perf.+88.3%

CAVA vs CMG vs SG vs SHAK vs BROS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CAVA logoCAVA
CMG logoCMG
SG logoSG
SHAK logoSHAK
BROS logoBROS
IndustryRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurantsRestaurants
Market Cap$9.82B$43.33B$816M$2.79B$6.81B
Revenue (TTM)$848M$12.14B$675M$1.49B$1.75B
Net Income (TTM)$38M$1.45B$17M$41M$81M
Gross Margin67.4%36.1%10.9%7.5%25.3%
Operating Margin4.7%15.8%-19.1%4.3%9.4%
Forward P/E161.5x29.3x50.2x60.3x
Total Debt$466M$9.85B$354M$902M$1.09B
Cash & Equiv.$283M$351M$89M$360M$269M

CAVA vs CMG vs SG vs SHAK vs BROSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CAVA
CMG
SG
SHAK
BROS
StockJun 23May 26Return
CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA)100206.4+106.4%
Chipotle Mexican Gr… (CMG)10077.8-22.2%
Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG)10053.6-46.4%
Shake Shack Inc. (SHAK)10089.1-10.9%
Dutch Bros Inc. (BROS)100188.3+88.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CAVA vs CMG vs SG vs SHAK vs BROS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CMG leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Dutch Bros Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CAVA
CAVA Group, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

CAVA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CMG
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

CMG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 267.2% 10Y total return vs CAVA's 93.1%
  • Lower P/E (29.3x vs 60.3x)
  • 12.0% margin vs SG's 2.5%
  • Beta 1.11 vs SG's 1.95
Best for: long-term compounding
SG
Sweetgreen, Inc.
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

SG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
SHAK
Shake Shack Inc.
The Defensive Pick

SHAK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.75, current ratio 1.76x
  • Beta 1.75, current ratio 1.76x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BROS
Dutch Bros Inc.
The Income Pick

BROS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.83
  • Rev growth 27.9%, EPS growth 103.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 30.4%
  • 27.9% revenue growth vs CAVA's -12.0%
  • -9.5% vs SG's -61.6%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBROS logoBROS27.9% revenue growth vs CAVA's -12.0%
ValueCMG logoCMGLower P/E (29.3x vs 60.3x)
Quality / MarginsCMG logoCMG12.0% margin vs SG's 2.5%
Stability / SafetyCMG logoCMGBeta 1.11 vs SG's 1.95
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BROS logoBROS-9.5% vs SG's -61.6%
Efficiency (ROA)CMG logoCMG16.0% ROA vs SG's 2.0%, ROIC 15.3% vs -14.1%

CAVA vs CMG vs SG vs SHAK vs BROS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CAVACAVA Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Restaurant Revenue
100.0%$1.2B
CMGChipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.
FY 2025
Food and Beverage
99.5%$11.9B
Delivery Service
0.5%$60M
SGSweetgreen, Inc.
FY 2025
Gift Card
100.0%$633,000
SHAKShake Shack Inc.
FY 2025
Shack Sales
96.3%$1.4B
Sales-Based Royalties
3.6%$52M
Initial Territory and Opening Fees
0.2%$3M
BROSDutch Bros Inc.
FY 2025
Franchise Fees
94.7%$122M
Product and Service, Other
5.3%$7M

CAVA vs CMG vs SG vs SHAK vs BROS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCMGLAGGINGSHAK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CMG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CMG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 18.0x SG's $675M. CMG is the more profitable business, keeping 12.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SG's 2.5%. On growth, BROS holds the edge at +30.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SG logoSGSweetgreen, Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$848M$12.1B$675M$1.5B$1.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$113M$2.3B-$54M$173M$244M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$38M$1.5B$17M$41M$81M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$26M$1.5B-$121M$16M$148M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+67.4%+36.1%+10.9%+7.5%+25.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.7%+15.8%-19.1%+4.3%+9.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.5%+12.0%+2.5%+2.8%+4.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.1%+12.4%-17.9%+1.1%+8.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-125.0%+7.4%-2.9%+14.3%+30.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-127.3%-17.9%+6.0%-110.0%0.0%
CMG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 29.2x trailing earnings, CMG trades at a 81% valuation discount to CAVA's 156.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SHAK's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CAVA's 77.5x.

MetricCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SG logoSGSweetgreen, Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.
Market CapShares × price$9.8B$43.3B$816M$2.8B$6.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$10.0B$52.8B$1.1B$3.3B$7.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS156.52x29.18x-6.03x63.53x85.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.161.48x29.29x50.21x60.32x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.82x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple77.54x22.25x17.31x27.60x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue11.58x3.63x1.20x1.93x4.16x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share12.79x15.78x2.28x5.23x7.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF375.47x29.93x49.34x125.12x
SG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CMG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CMG delivers a 48.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $48 in annual profit, vs $4 for SG. CAVA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMG's 3.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHAK scores 7/9 vs SG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SG logoSGSweetgreen, Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+4.9%+48.4%+4.0%+7.6%+9.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.8%+16.0%+2.0%+2.2%+2.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.0%+15.3%-14.1%+6.0%+7.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+4.9%+25.4%-15.8%+5.4%+6.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–955276
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.60x3.48x1.00x1.63x1.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$183M$9.5B$265M$542M$820M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$283M$351M$89M$360M$269M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$466M$9.8B$354M$902M$1.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2320.23x16.87x11.85x
CMG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CAVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CAVA five years ago would be worth $19,306 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,388 for SG. Over the past 12 months, BROS leads with a -9.5% total return vs SG's -61.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CAVA at 24.5% vs SG's -9.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SG logoSGSweetgreen, Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+39.6%-11.3%-0.9%-17.0%-13.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-9.9%-35.6%-61.6%-32.1%-9.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+93.1%-18.2%-24.8%+3.5%+66.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+93.1%+16.7%-86.1%-22.6%+46.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+93.1%+267.2%-86.1%+98.2%+46.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+24.5%-6.5%-9.1%+1.1%+18.4%
CAVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CAVA and CMG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CMG is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SG's 1.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CAVA currently trades 83.3% from its 52-week high vs SG's 36.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SG logoSGSweetgreen, Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.83x1.11x1.95x1.75x1.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$101.50$58.42$18.63$144.65$77.88
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$43.41$29.75$4.49$67.20$44.58
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.3%+56.9%+36.9%+47.9%+68.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10050.943.057.948.062.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.8M14.5M4.1M1.5M4.1M
Evenly matched — CAVA and CMG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BROS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CAVA as "Buy", CMG as "Buy", SG as "Hold", SHAK as "Hold", BROS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.6% upside for SHAK (target: $121) vs -2.2% for CAVA (target: $83).

MetricCAVA logoCAVACAVA Group, Inc.CMG logoCMGChipotle Mexican …SG logoSGSweetgreen, Inc.SHAK logoSHAKShake Shack Inc.BROS logoBROSDutch Bros Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$82.63$43.72$7.51$120.89$74.45
# AnalystsCovering analysts2367153521
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+5.6%0.0%0.0%0.0%
BROS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CMG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallChipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CAVA vs CMG vs SG vs SHAK vs BROS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CAVA or CMG or SG or SHAK or BROS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Dutch Bros Inc.

(BROS) is the stronger pick with 27. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 0% for CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA). Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (29. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CAVA or CMG or SG or SHAK or BROS?

On trailing P/E, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

(CMG) is the cheapest at 29. 2x versus CAVA Group, Inc. at 156. 5x. On forward P/E, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. is actually cheaper at 29. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CAVA or CMG or SG or SHAK or BROS?

Over the past 5 years, CAVA Group, Inc.

(CAVA) delivered a total return of +93. 1%, compared to -86. 1% for Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMG returned +267. 2% versus SG's -86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CAVA or CMG or SG or SHAK or BROS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

(CMG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Sweetgreen, Inc. 's 1. 95β — meaning SG is approximately 75% more volatile than CMG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 3% for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CAVA or CMG or SG or SHAK or BROS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dutch Bros Inc.

(BROS) is pulling ahead at 27. 9% versus -12. 0% for CAVA Group, Inc. (CAVA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Shake Shack Inc. grew EPS 354. 2% year-over-year, compared to -50. 9% for CAVA Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BROS leads at 30. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CAVA or CMG or SG or SHAK or BROS?

Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

(CMG) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -19. 7% for Sweetgreen, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMG leads at 16. 9% versus -16. 4% for SG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CAVA leads at 67. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CAVA or CMG or SG or SHAK or BROS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

(CMG) trades at 29. 3x forward P/E versus 161. 5x for CAVA Group, Inc. — 132. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHAK: 74. 6% to $120. 89.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CAVA or CMG or SG or SHAK or BROS?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CAVA or CMG or SG or SHAK or BROS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.

(CMG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), +267. 2% 10Y return). Sweetgreen, Inc. (SG) carries a higher beta of 1. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CMG: +267. 2%, SG: -86. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CAVA and CMG and SG and SHAK and BROS?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CAVA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CMG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHAK is a small-cap high-growth stock; BROS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CAVA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CMG

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SHAK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BROS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CAVA and CMG and SG and SHAK and BROS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CAVA: -125.0% · CMG: 7.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(CAVA: 4.5% · CMG: 12.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(CAVA: 156.5x · CMG: 29.2x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.