Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CBAN vs CZWI vs LKFN vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CBAN vs CZWI vs LKFN vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $372M | $206M | $1.60B | $2.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $90M | $422M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $14M | $103M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 66.4% | 54.7% | 61.0% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.9% | 7.0% | 29.8% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.1x | 11.8x | 14.2x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $268M | $52M | $184M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $119M | $57M | $185M |
CBAN vs CZWI vs LKFN vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Colony Bankcorp, In… (CBAN) | 100 | 156.1 | +56.1% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 291.2 | +191.2% |
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 144.2 | +44.2% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CBAN vs CZWI vs LKFN vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CBAN is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.1x vs 14.2x), PEG 1.98 vs 3.57
CZWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 161.7% 10Y total return vs CBAN's 145.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.45, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.45 vs CBAN's 0.90, lower leverage
LKFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and bank quality.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 3.2%
- NIM 3.2% vs CBAN's 2.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- PEG 1.55 vs LKFN's 3.57
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.1x vs 14.2x), PEG 1.98 vs 3.57 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs CBAN's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.0% vs LKFN's +6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs CZWI's 0.5% |
CBAN vs CZWI vs LKFN vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CBAN vs CZWI vs LKFN vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LKFN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CBAN leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LKFN and NBTB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 9.6x CZWI's $90M. LKFN is the more profitable business, keeping 24.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CBAN's 15.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $90M | $422M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $42M | $9M | $130M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $14M | $103M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $11M | $104M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.4% | +54.7% | +61.0% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +7.0% | +29.8% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.2% | +16.0% | +24.5% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -3.7% | +11.5% | +24.6% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +63.0% | +23.4% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CBAN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.5x trailing earnings, CBAN trades at a 19% valuation discount to LKFN's 15.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.95x vs LKFN's 3.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $372M | $206M | $1.6B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $613M | $139M | $1.7B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.48x | 14.66x | 15.35x | 13.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.10x | 11.76x | 14.17x | 10.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.45x | 2.89x | 3.86x | 1.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.40x | 15.63x | 13.28x | 10.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.00x | 2.29x | 3.80x | 2.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.94x | 1.11x | 2.08x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 19.85x | 15.46x | 10.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $8 for CZWI. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CBAN's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs LKFN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.0% | +7.8% | +14.2% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.5% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +2.0% | +11.6% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.7% | +0.6% | +15.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | 0.28x | 0.24x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $241M | -$67M | $127M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $119M | $57M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $268M | $52M | $184M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.63x | 0.16x | 0.82x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,303 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,130 for LKFN. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +46.0% total return vs LKFN's +6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 38.4% vs LKFN's 13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.4% | +24.0% | +10.9% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.2% | +46.0% | +6.1% | +8.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.4% | +165.0% | +45.8% | +55.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.0% | +73.0% | +11.3% | +33.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +145.6% | +161.7% | +139.3% | +104.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.8% | +38.4% | +13.4% | +15.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CZWI and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CBAN's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs LKFN's 88.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.45x | 0.77x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.61 | $22.62 | $69.40 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.63 | $12.83 | $54.36 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +94.6% | +88.7% | +97.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.9 | 64.4 | 62.0 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 259K | 40K | 154K | 237K |
Analyst Outlook
LKFN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CBAN as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", LKFN as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.2% upside for LKFN (target: $66) vs 0.9% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, LKFN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.24% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $66.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 2 | 10 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +1.7% | +3.2% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 7 | 12 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.45 | $0.37 | $2.00 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +3.0% | +1.3% | +0.4% |
LKFN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). CBAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CBAN vs CZWI vs LKFN vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CBAN or CZWI or LKFN or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (CBAN) offers the better valuation at 12. 5x trailing P/E (10. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CBAN or CZWI or LKFN or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, Colony Bankcorp, Inc.
(CBAN) is the cheapest at 12. 5x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation at 15. 3x. On forward P/E, Colony Bankcorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 55x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CBAN or CZWI or LKFN or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +73. 0%, compared to +11. 3% for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +161. 7% versus NBTB's +104. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CBAN or CZWI or LKFN or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 45β versus Colony Bankcorp, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning CBAN is approximately 98% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 71% for Colony Bankcorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CBAN or CZWI or LKFN or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Colony Bankcorp, Inc. grew EPS 16. 9% year-over-year, compared to 9. 0% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CBAN or CZWI or LKFN or NBTB?
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
5% net margin versus 15. 2% for Colony Bankcorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKFN leads at 29. 8% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CBAN or CZWI or LKFN or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 55x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 57x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Colony Bankcorp, Inc. (CBAN) trades at 10. 1x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for Lakeland Financial Corporation — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LKFN: 7. 2% to $66. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CBAN or CZWI or LKFN or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 7% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is CBAN or CZWI or LKFN or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 45), 1. 7% yield, +161. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +161. 7%, NBTB: +104. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CBAN and CZWI and LKFN and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.