CDRO vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI vs GENI

For growth investors, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is the stronger pick with 31.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for Codere Online Luxembourg, S. A. (CDRO). Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) offers the better valuation at 199. 2x trailing P/E (46. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.

(RSI) is the cheapest at 199. 2x versus Codere Online Luxembourg, S. A. at 263. 5x. On forward P/E, Flutter Entertainment plc is actually cheaper at 16. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.

(RSI) delivered a total return of +113. 9%, compared to -74. 6% for Genius Sports Limited (GENI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RSI returned +189. 9% versus GENI's -52. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Codere Online Luxembourg, S.

A. (CDRO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Genius Sports Limited's 1. 50β — meaning GENI is approximately 192% more volatile than CDRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Genius Sports Limited (GENI) is pulling ahead at 31.

0% versus 4. 8% for Codere Online Luxembourg, S. A. (CDRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rush Street Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 418. 5% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Rush Street Interactive, Inc.

(RSI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -16. 7% for Genius Sports Limited — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RSI leads at 7. 7% versus -15. 6% for GENI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDRO leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.

5x forward P/E versus 99. 1x for DraftKings Inc. — 82. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GENI: 153. 9% to $12. 10.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Codere Online Luxembourg, S.

A. (CDRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51)). Genius Sports Limited (GENI) carries a higher beta of 1. 50 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CDRO: -9. 3%, GENI: -52. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CDRO (Consumer Cyclical) and DKNG (Consumer Cyclical) and FLUT (Consumer Cyclical) and RSI (Consumer Cyclical) and GENI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CDRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; GENI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.