Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CFFI vs MNSB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
CFFI vs MNSB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $252M | $176M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $136M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $16M |
| Gross Margin | 69.5% | 54.4% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | 14.0% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $116M | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $25M |
CFFI vs MNSB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CFFI vs MNSB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CFFI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.4%
- Rev growth 11.8%, EPS growth 37.9%
- 144.1% 10Y total return vs MNSB's 126.9%
MNSB is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFFI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- +26.4% vs CFFI's +24.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFFI's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.8% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 10.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFFI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs MNSB's 0.66 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.4% vs CFFI's +24.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFFI's 0.5% |
CFFI vs MNSB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CFFI vs MNSB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFI and MNSB operate at a comparable scale, with $186M and $136M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 14.4% (CFFI) to 11.5% (MNSB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $136M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $23M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $16M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $13M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.5% | +54.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +14.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +7.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.7% | +120.9% |
Valuation Metrics
CFFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 30% valuation discount to MNSB's 13.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CFFI's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNSB's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $252M | $176M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $354M | $221M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.35x | 13.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.51x | 10.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.72x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 1.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.38x | 16.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CFFI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CFFI delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. MNSB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFI's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFI scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +5.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $102M | $45M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $25M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $116M | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.73x | 0.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CFFI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFFI five years ago would be worth $19,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,056 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, MNSB leads with a +26.4% total return vs CFFI's +24.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CFFI at 18.5% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.3% | +19.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.3% | +26.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | +21.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +20.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.1% | +126.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | +6.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CFFI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CFFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MNSB's 0.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $80.99 | $25.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $57.09 | $17.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +93.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 58K |
Analyst Outlook
MNSB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CFFI is the only dividend payer here at 2.37% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.84 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
CFFI leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MNSB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook).
CFFI vs MNSB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CFFI or MNSB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the stronger pick with 11.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) a "Hold" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CFFI or MNSB?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. at 13. 4x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CFFI or MNSB?
Over the past 5 years, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) delivered a total return of +95.
4%, compared to +20. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CFFI returned +144. 1% versus MNSB's +126. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CFFI or MNSB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
61β versus MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. 's 0. 66β — meaning MNSB is approximately 9% more volatile than CFFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 44% for C&F Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CFFI or MNSB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is pulling ahead at 11.
8% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 37. 9% for C&F Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CFFI or MNSB?
C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
4% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CFFI leads at 17. 8% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CFFI leads at 69. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CFFI or MNSB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7.
5x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CFFI or MNSB?
In this comparison, CFFI (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CFFI or MNSB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
61), 2. 4% yield, +144. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFFI: +144. 1%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CFFI and MNSB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CFFI pays a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.