Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $252M | $176M | $240M | $253M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $186M | $136M | $85M | $112M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $27M | $16M | $16M | $18M |
| Gross Margin | 69.5% | 54.4% | 65.1% | 74.0% |
| Operating Margin | 17.8% | 14.0% | 22.5% | 19.6% |
| Forward P/E | 7.5x | 10.4x | 11.7x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $116M | $70M | $2M | $43M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $25M | $8M | $161M |
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
| MainStreet Bancshar… (MNSB) | 100 | 177.2 | +77.2% |
| National Bankshares… (NKSH) | 100 | 122.4 | +22.4% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CFFI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.61, yield 2.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.61, Low D/E 44.1%, current ratio 24.17x
- PEG 1.16 vs FXNC's 7.87
- Beta 0.61, yield 2.4%, current ratio 24.17x
MNSB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5%
NKSH is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 4.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +49.7% vs CFFI's +24.3%
FXNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs CFFI's 144.1%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs MNSB's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.7x), PEG 1.16 vs 7.87 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.61 vs NKSH's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs FXNC's 2.2%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +49.7% vs CFFI's +24.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FXNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
CFFI leads 2 • NKSH leads 1 • MNSB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FXNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $186M annually — 2.2x NKSH's $85M. NKSH is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNSB's 11.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $186M | $136M | $85M | $112M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $36M | $23M | $20M | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $27M | $16M | $16M | $18M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $22M | $13M | $17M | $21M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.5% | +54.4% | +65.1% | +74.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.8% | +14.0% | +22.5% | +19.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +11.5% | +18.6% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +7.8% | +17.8% | +18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.7% | +120.9% | +91.7% | +7.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CFFI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 38% valuation discount to NKSH's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CFFI offers better value at 1.45x vs NKSH's 145.48x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $252M | $176M | $240M | $253M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $354M | $221M | $234M | $134M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.35x | 13.36x | 15.14x | 14.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.51x | 10.45x | 11.71x | 11.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.45x | — | 145.48x | 9.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.72x | 11.58x | 12.20x | 6.13x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 1.30x | 2.81x | 2.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.96x | 0.82x | 1.30x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.38x | 16.57x | 15.85x | 12.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NKSH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CFFI delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for MNSB. NKSH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFI's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFI scores 8/9 vs MNSB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.8% | +7.3% | +9.0% | +10.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +0.7% | +0.9% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +5.0% | +8.4% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +0.9% | +1.9% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.44x | 0.32x | 0.01x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $102M | $45M | -$6M | -$118M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $25M | $8M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $116M | $70M | $2M | $43M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.73x | 0.31x | 0.64x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FXNC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFFI five years ago would be worth $19,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,056 for MNSB. Over the past 12 months, NKSH leads with a +49.7% total return vs CFFI's +24.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FXNC at 28.2% vs MNSB's 6.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.3% | +19.4% | +14.2% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.3% | +26.4% | +49.7% | +46.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | +21.5% | +55.1% | +110.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.4% | +20.6% | +31.9% | +68.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.1% | +126.9% | +51.3% | +241.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | +6.7% | +15.7% | +28.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CFFI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CFFI is the less volatile stock with a 0.61 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKSH's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.66x | 0.76x | 0.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $80.99 | $25.17 | $40.00 | $29.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $57.09 | $17.86 | $24.74 | $18.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.7% | +93.4% | +94.3% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 50.4 | 51.1 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 58K | 50K | 80K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NKSH and FXNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNSB as "Hold", NKSH as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy". For income investors, NKSH offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs FXNC's 2.19%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $21.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | — | +4.0% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.84 | — | $1.51 | $0.61 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
FXNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CFFI leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
CFFI vs MNSB vs NKSH vs FXNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus National Bankshares, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: C&F Financial Corporation wins at 1. 16x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 145. 48x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC?
Over the past 5 years, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) delivered a total return of +95.
4%, compared to +20. 6% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus NKSH's +51. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
61β versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning NKSH is approximately 24% more volatile than CFFI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, National Bankshares, Inc. (NKSH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 44% for C&F Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -1. 4% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. (MNSB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 210. 0% year-over-year, compared to 37. 9% for C&F Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC?
National Bankshares, Inc.
(NKSH) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 6% net margin versus 11. 5% for MainStreet Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NKSH leads at 22. 5% versus 14. 0% for MNSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus National Bankshares, Inc. 's 145. 48x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 7x for First National Corporation — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC?
In this comparison, NKSH (4.
0% yield), CFFI (2. 4% yield), FXNC (2. 2% yield) pay a dividend. MNSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CFFI or MNSB or NKSH or FXNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
61), 2. 4% yield, +144. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CFFI: +144. 1%, MNSB: +126. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CFFI and MNSB and NKSH and FXNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CFFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; MNSB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NKSH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock. CFFI, NKSH, FXNC pay a dividend while MNSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.