Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CFFN vs KRNY vs WAFD vs FHN vs COLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CFFN vs KRNY vs WAFD vs FHN vs COLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $508M | $2.73B | $11.87B | $7.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $417M | $344M | $1.41B | $4.99B | $3.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $32M | $243M | $982M | $550M |
| Gross Margin | 47.3% | 44.1% | 50.9% | 67.3% | 67.7% |
| Operating Margin | 19.9% | 9.0% | 20.5% | 25.7% | 23.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | 12.9x | 10.9x | 11.4x | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $1.26B | $1.82B | $4.57B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $252M | $167M | $657M | $961M | $511M |
CFFN vs KRNY vs WAFD vs FHN vs COLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| First Horizon Corpo… (FHN) | 100 | 261.7 | +161.7% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CFFN vs KRNY vs WAFD vs FHN vs COLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CFFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 79.3%
- 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs COLB's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
- +44.6% vs WAFD's +28.5%
KRNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.83, yield 5.5%, current ratio 1.20x
- 5.5% yield, vs WAFD's 3.0%
WAFD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 3.55 vs CFFN's 5.80
- Beta 0.81 vs COLB's 1.37
FHN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 119.6% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 84.4%
- NIM 3.1% vs KRNY's 1.7%
COLB is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 11.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs COLB's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs COLB's 1.37 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs WAFD's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.6% vs WAFD's +28.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs COLB's 0.4% |
CFFN vs KRNY vs WAFD vs FHN vs COLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CFFN vs KRNY vs WAFD vs FHN vs COLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FHN leads in 3 of 6 categories
COLB leads 1 • WAFD leads 1 • CFFN leads 0 • KRNY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FHN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FHN is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.0B annually — 14.5x KRNY's $344M. FHN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 7.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $417M | $344M | $1.4B | $5.0B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $97M | $43M | $277M | $1.3B | $895M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | $32M | $243M | $982M | $550M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $40M | $226M | $628M | $724M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.3% | +44.1% | +50.9% | +67.3% | +67.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +9.0% | +20.5% | +25.7% | +23.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +7.6% | +16.0% | +19.7% | +17.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +6.2% | +14.8% | +12.6% | +22.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +50.0% | +46.3% | +79.3% | +5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
COLB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.9x trailing earnings, COLB trades at a 33% valuation discount to KRNY's 19.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WAFD offers better value at 4.41x vs CFFN's 7.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $508M | $2.7B | $11.9B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $1.6B | $3.9B | $15.5B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.04x | 19.24x | 13.56x | 13.02x | 12.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.85x | 12.93x | 10.93x | 11.41x | 9.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.36x | — | 4.41x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.91x | 44.52x | 12.98x | 11.58x | 11.76x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.43x | 1.48x | 1.93x | 2.38x | 2.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 0.68x | 0.94x | 1.33x | 1.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.37x | 23.76x | 13.09x | 18.90x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FHN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FHN delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $4 for KRNY. FHN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.50x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFN scores 7/9 vs COLB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +4.3% | +8.0% | +10.7% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.4% | +1.0% | +1.2% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +1.1% | +3.9% | +7.0% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +1.5% | +5.7% | +10.2% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.86x | 1.68x | 0.60x | 0.50x | 0.51x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $1.1B | $1.2B | $3.6B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $252M | $167M | $657M | $961M | $511M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $1.3B | $1.8B | $4.6B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | 0.22x | 0.48x | 0.82x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FHN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FHN five years ago would be worth $14,355 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, CFFN leads with a +44.6% total return vs WAFD's +28.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FHN at 34.9% vs KRNY's 9.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.0% | +12.9% | +11.9% | +2.1% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.6% | +37.9% | +28.5% | +34.9% | +32.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | +32.6% | +51.6% | +145.7% | +75.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.6% | -20.5% | +22.5% | +43.6% | -18.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.0% | -9.0% | +84.4% | +119.6% | +51.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.2% | +9.9% | +14.9% | +34.9% | +20.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs COLB's 90.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.83x | 0.81x | 1.10x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.96 | $8.50 | $36.12 | $26.56 | $32.70 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $5.76 | $26.31 | $18.58 | $21.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +95.1% | +98.8% | +92.1% | +90.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 55.8 | 68.3 | 62.0 | 60.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 926K | 298K | 661K | 5.0M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRNY and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CFFN as "Hold", KRNY as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", FHN as "Hold", COLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs -10.5% for CFFN (target: $7). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.45% vs FHN's 2.59%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $9.50 | $35.00 | $28.00 | $32.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 5 | 11 | 35 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +5.5% | +3.0% | +2.6% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 7 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.34 | $0.44 | $1.05 | $0.63 | $1.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +0.1% | +3.7% | +7.7% | +1.5% |
FHN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). COLB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CFFN vs KRNY vs WAFD vs FHN vs COLB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CFFN or KRNY or WAFD or FHN or COLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is the stronger pick with 10. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) offers the better valuation at 12. 9x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CFFN or KRNY or WAFD or FHN or COLB?
On trailing P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc.
(COLB) is the cheapest at 12. 9x versus Kearny Financial Corp. at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WaFd, Inc. wins at 3. 55x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CFFN or KRNY or WAFD or FHN or COLB?
Over the past 5 years, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) delivered a total return of +43.
6%, compared to -20. 5% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FHN returned +119. 6% versus KRNY's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CFFN or KRNY or WAFD or FHN or COLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning COLB is approximately 68% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Horizon Corporation (FHN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 50% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CFFN or KRNY or WAFD or FHN or COLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is pulling ahead at 10. 0% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CFFN or KRNY or WAFD or FHN or COLB?
First Horizon Corporation (FHN) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FHN leads at 25. 7% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COLB leads at 67. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CFFN or KRNY or WAFD or FHN or COLB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 55x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for Kearny Financial Corp. — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 17. 6% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CFFN or KRNY or WAFD or FHN or COLB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 2. 6% for First Horizon Corporation (FHN).
09Is CFFN or KRNY or WAFD or FHN or COLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +84. 4%, COLB: +51. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CFFN and KRNY and WAFD and FHN and COLB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; FHN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.