Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs TRST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs TRST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $2.73B | $5.29B | $2.02B | $858M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $417M | $1.41B | $1.45B | $877M | $278M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $73M | $243M | $458M | $126M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 47.3% | 50.9% | 65.6% | 68.3% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | 19.9% | 20.5% | 36.0% | 18.8% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | 10.9x | 10.8x | 10.2x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $1.95B | $1.82B | $1.20B | $446M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $252M | $657M | $910M | $234M | $51M |
CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs TRST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| Northwest Bancshare… (NWBI) | 100 | 138.9 | +38.9% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 153.7 | +53.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs TRST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CFFN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 79.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5%
Among these 5 stocks, WAFD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HOMB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for bank quality.
- NIM 3.8% vs CFFN's 1.8%
- 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs NWBI's 5.4%
NWBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 5.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 23.6%, current ratio 0.13x
- PEG 1.24 vs CFFN's 5.80
- Beta 0.73, yield 5.4%, current ratio 0.13x
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 97.2% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 84.4%
- +60.3% vs HOMB's -1.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.3% NII/revenue growth vs WAFD's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 16.9x), PEG 1.24 vs 4.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs CFFN's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 21-year raise streak, vs NWBI's 5.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NWBI's 0.5% |
CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs TRST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs TRST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOMB leads in 3 of 6 categories
TRST leads 1 • CFFN leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • NWBI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 5.2x TRST's $278M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NWBI's 14.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $417M | $1.4B | $1.5B | $877M | $278M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $97M | $277M | $601M | $166M | $90M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $73M | $243M | $458M | $126M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $61M | $226M | $354M | $142M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.3% | +50.9% | +65.6% | +68.3% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +20.5% | +36.0% | +18.8% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.3% | +16.0% | +27.7% | +14.4% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +14.8% | +29.1% | +16.2% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +46.3% | +26.0% | +19.2% | +44.1% |
Valuation Metrics
HOMB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.4x trailing earnings, HOMB trades at a 11% valuation discount to CFFN's 15.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NWBI offers better value at 1.83x vs CFFN's 7.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $2.7B | $5.3B | $2.0B | $858M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $3.9B | $5.6B | $2.2B | $1000M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.04x | 13.56x | 13.36x | 15.03x | 14.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.85x | 10.93x | 10.82x | 10.20x | 16.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.36x | 4.41x | 4.39x | 1.83x | 4.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.91x | 12.98x | 10.12x | 13.57x | 11.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.43x | 1.93x | 3.64x | 2.31x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 0.94x | 1.36x | 1.07x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.37x | 13.09x | 12.53x | 14.27x | 18.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $7 for CFFN. NWBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +8.0% | +10.9% | +7.2% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.0% | +2.0% | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +3.9% | +7.2% | +5.6% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +5.7% | +9.8% | +6.8% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.86x | 0.60x | 0.30x | 0.24x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $1.2B | $292M | $213M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $252M | $657M | $910M | $234M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $446M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.41x | 0.48x | 1.44x | 0.73x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TRST leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $14,654 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,144 for CFFN. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRST at 23.5% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.0% | +11.9% | -3.0% | +18.8% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.6% | +28.5% | -1.9% | +18.3% | +60.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.9% | +51.6% | +42.0% | +56.2% | +88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.6% | +22.5% | +6.6% | +26.6% | +46.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.0% | +84.4% | +58.2% | +52.3% | +97.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.2% | +14.9% | +12.4% | +16.0% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WAFD and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NWBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CFFN's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 0.81x | 0.82x | 0.73x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.96 | $36.12 | $30.83 | $14.26 | $49.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.51 | $26.31 | $25.68 | $11.25 | $30.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +98.8% | +87.1% | +97.0% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 68.3 | 50.3 | 64.4 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 926K | 661K | 1.4M | 1.3M | 112K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOMB and NWBI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CFFN as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", NWBI as "Hold", TRST as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -10.5% for CFFN (target: $7). For income investors, NWBI offers the higher dividend yield at 5.42% vs HOMB's 2.79%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $35.00 | $32.00 | $14.67 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 11 | 19 | 14 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.4% | +3.0% | +2.8% | +5.4% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 21 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.34 | $1.05 | $0.75 | $0.75 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +3.7% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +4.4% |
HOMB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). TRST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs NWBI vs TRST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or TRST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB) offers the better valuation at 13. 4x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or TRST?
On trailing P/E, Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the cheapest at 13. 4x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northwest Bancshares, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or TRST?
Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +46.
5%, compared to -18. 6% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRST returned +97. 2% versus CFFN's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or TRST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning CFFN is approximately 38% more volatile than NWBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or TRST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
(NWBI) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus -1. 6% for WaFd, Inc. (WAFD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. grew EPS 79. 3% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for Home Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or TRST?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus 14. 4% for Northwest Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus 18. 8% for NWBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NWBI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or TRST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 6. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or TRST?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northwest Bancshares, Inc. (NWBI) offers the highest yield at 5. 4%, versus 2. 8% for Home Bancshares, Inc. (HOMB).
09Is CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or NWBI or TRST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
75), 3. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRST: +97. 2%, CFFN: +12. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CFFN and WAFD and HOMB and NWBI and TRST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NWBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.