Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CHCO vs FFIN vs WSFS vs SFNC vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CHCO vs FFIN vs WSFS vs SFNC vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.76B | $4.61B | $3.80B | $3.09B | $2.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $392M | $739M | $1.36B | $627M | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $130M | $243M | $287M | $-398M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 79.0% | 70.8% | 74.7% | 5.8% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 41.5% | 36.8% | 28.0% | -84.2% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.6x | 15.9x | 11.8x | 10.3x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $518M | $197M | $303M | $641M | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $152M | $763M | $1.33B | $380M | $185M |
CHCO vs FFIN vs WSFS vs SFNC vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| City Holding Company (CHCO) | 100 | 195.1 | +95.1% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 260.4 | +160.4% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHCO vs FFIN vs WSFS vs SFNC vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHCO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.55, yield 2.7%
- 208.1% 10Y total return vs WSFS's 129.0%
- NIM 3.5% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- Beta 0.55 vs SFNC's 1.02
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%
WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 11.1%, current ratio 0.08x
- PEG 0.67 vs FFIN's 3.05
- +37.7% vs FFIN's -3.2%
SFNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x)
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs CHCO's 2.7%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs CHCO's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.7% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
CHCO vs FFIN vs WSFS vs SFNC vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CHCO vs FFIN vs WSFS vs SFNC vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • WSFS leads 1 • FFIN leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHCO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 3.5x CHCO's $392M. CHCO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $392M | $739M | $1.4B | $627M | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $171M | $310M | $408M | -$497M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $130M | $243M | $287M | -$398M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $128M | $290M | $214M | $755M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.0% | +70.8% | +74.7% | +5.8% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +41.5% | +36.8% | +28.0% | -84.2% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.3% | +30.2% | +21.1% | -63.4% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.8% | +39.6% | +15.7% | +71.7% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.4% | -7.7% | +22.9% | +42.1% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 35% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WSFS offers better value at 0.81x vs FFIN's 3.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.8B | $4.6B | $3.8B | $3.1B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $4.0B | $2.8B | $3.4B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.73x | 20.76x | 14.16x | -7.24x | 13.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.63x | 15.92x | 11.79x | 10.35x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.37x | 3.98x | 0.81x | — | 1.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.42x | 14.17x | 6.80x | — | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.49x | 6.23x | 2.79x | 4.93x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.18x | 2.89x | 1.44x | 0.84x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.71x | 15.73x | 17.79x | 6.88x | 10.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHCO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHCO delivers a 16.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHCO's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHCO scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.7% | +13.3% | +10.6% | -11.6% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.6% | +1.4% | -1.6% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.6% | +11.0% | +9.5% | -9.1% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +16.0% | +10.3% | -4.2% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.12x | 0.11x | 0.19x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $366M | -$566M | -$1.0B | $261M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $152M | $763M | $1.3B | $380M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $518M | $197M | $303M | $641M | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.92x | 1.48x | 1.30x | -1.01x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSFS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHCO five years ago would be worth $17,077 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, WSFS leads with a +37.7% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSFS at 33.0% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.8% | +8.5% | +31.2% | +14.6% | +9.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.1% | -3.2% | +37.7% | +16.7% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.5% | +29.1% | +135.3% | +53.4% | +54.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.8% | -28.2% | +43.1% | -15.4% | +29.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +208.1% | +145.4% | +129.0% | +25.2% | +102.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.6% | +8.9% | +33.0% | +15.3% | +15.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHCO and WSFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CHCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.95x | 0.89x | 1.02x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $133.59 | $38.74 | $73.22 | $22.18 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $113.21 | $28.11 | $49.92 | $17.00 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +83.6% | +98.4% | +96.3% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 58.2 | 64.0 | 62.3 | 57.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 119K | 740K | 385K | 1.2M | 236K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CHCO and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CHCO as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs WSFS's 0.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $130.00 | $39.25 | $74.67 | $22.67 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 15 | 13 | 9 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.2% | +0.9% | +4.0% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 11 | 1 | 6 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.29 | $0.72 | $0.68 | $0.85 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | 0.0% | +7.6% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
CHCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CHCO vs FFIN vs WSFS vs SFNC vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHCO or FFIN or WSFS or SFNC or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHCO or FFIN or WSFS or SFNC or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WSFS Financial Corporation wins at 0. 67x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHCO or FFIN or WSFS or SFNC or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, City Holding Company (CHCO) delivered a total return of +70.
8%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHCO returned +208. 1% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHCO or FFIN or WSFS or SFNC or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), City Holding Company (CHCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
55β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 87% more volatile than CHCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 64% for City Holding Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHCO or FFIN or WSFS or SFNC or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WSFS Financial Corporation grew EPS 15. 4% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHCO or FFIN or WSFS or SFNC or NBTB?
City Holding Company (CHCO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
3% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 33. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHCO leads at 41. 5% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHCO leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHCO or FFIN or WSFS or SFNC or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. 's 3. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHCO or FFIN or WSFS or SFNC or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is CHCO or FFIN or WSFS or SFNC or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, City Holding Company (CHCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
55), 2. 7% yield, +208. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CHCO: +208. 1%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHCO and FFIN and WSFS and SFNC and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.