Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CHMG vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FXNC vs LKFN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CHMG vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FXNC vs LKFN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $331M | $252M | $203M | $253M | $1.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $186M | $90M | $112M | $422M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $27M | $14M | $18M | $103M |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | 69.5% | 54.7% | 74.0% | 61.0% |
| Operating Margin | 14.2% | 17.8% | 7.0% | 19.6% | 29.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 7.5x | 11.8x | 11.7x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $116M | $52M | $43M | $184M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $14M | $119M | $161M | $57M |
CHMG vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FXNC vs LKFN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 272.1 | +172.1% |
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| First National Corp… (FXNC) | 100 | 210.5 | +110.5% |
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 146.6 | +46.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHMG vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FXNC vs LKFN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHMG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +54.5% vs LKFN's +9.0%
CFFI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency and defensive.
- PEG 1.16 vs FXNC's 7.87
- Beta 0.61, yield 2.4%, current ratio 24.17x
- NIM 3.8% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 14.4x), PEG 1.16 vs 3.63
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46 vs LKFN's 0.79
FXNC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 241.1% 10Y total return vs CHMG's 198.0%
- 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
LKFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 14.4x), PEG 1.16 vs 3.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs LKFN's 0.79 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs CZWI's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.5% vs LKFN's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FXNC's 0.5% |
CHMG vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FXNC vs LKFN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CHMG vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FXNC vs LKFN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LKFN leads in 3 of 6 categories
CFFI leads 1 • CHMG leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • FXNC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LKFN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LKFN is the larger business by revenue, generating $422M annually — 4.7x CZWI's $90M. LKFN is the more profitable business, keeping 24.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHMG's 10.8%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $186M | $90M | $112M | $422M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $36M | $9M | $25M | $130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $27M | $14M | $18M | $103M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | $22M | $11M | $21M | $104M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +69.5% | +54.7% | +74.0% | +61.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | +17.8% | +7.0% | +19.6% | +29.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +14.4% | +16.0% | +15.8% | +24.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +11.9% | +11.5% | +18.7% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.8% | +10.7% | +63.0% | +7.1% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CFFI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 58% valuation discount to CHMG's 22.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CFFI offers better value at 1.45x vs FXNC's 9.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $331M | $252M | $203M | $253M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $314M | $354M | $136M | $134M | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.01x | 9.35x | 14.44x | 14.27x | 15.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.64x | 7.51x | 11.78x | 11.75x | 14.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.45x | 2.85x | 9.55x | 3.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.73x | 10.72x | 15.28x | 6.13x | 13.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.37x | 1.36x | 2.25x | 2.25x | 3.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 0.96x | 1.09x | 1.35x | 2.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 163.62x | 11.38x | 19.55x | 12.03x | 15.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for CHMG. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFI's 0.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFI scores 8/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +10.8% | +7.8% | +10.0% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +0.9% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +6.8% | +2.0% | +7.7% | +11.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +2.1% | +0.6% | +9.9% | +15.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.44x | 0.28x | 0.23x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$18M | $102M | -$67M | -$118M | $127M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $14M | $119M | $161M | $57M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $116M | $52M | $43M | $184M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.73x | 0.16x | 0.84x | 0.82x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CHMG and CZWI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFFI five years ago would be worth $19,542 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,052 for LKFN. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +54.5% total return vs LKFN's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs LKFN's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.0% | +10.3% | +21.5% | +14.6% | +12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.5% | +24.3% | +45.6% | +46.9% | +9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.2% | +66.5% | +160.0% | +110.8% | +48.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.4% | +95.4% | +71.2% | +68.7% | +10.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.0% | +144.1% | +157.0% | +241.1% | +142.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.7% | +18.5% | +37.5% | +28.2% | +14.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHMG and CZWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CZWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LKFN's 0.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHMG currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs LKFN's 90.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.61x | 0.46x | 0.70x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.83 | $80.99 | $22.62 | $29.85 | $69.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.20 | $57.09 | $12.83 | $18.31 | $54.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +95.7% | +93.2% | +93.7% | +90.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.4 | 46.5 | 63.7 | 47.6 | 60.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 4K | 40K | 80K | 153K |
Analyst Outlook
LKFN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CHMG as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FXNC as "Buy", LKFN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 5.4% upside for LKFN (target: $66) vs -27.4% for CHMG (target: $50). For income investors, LKFN offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | — | — | $21.00 | $66.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | — | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +2.2% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | $1.84 | $0.37 | $0.61 | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.1% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
LKFN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CFFI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CHMG vs CFFI vs CZWI vs FXNC vs LKFN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHMG or CFFI or CZWI or FXNC or LKFN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First National Corporation (FXNC) is the stronger pick with 27.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHMG or CFFI or CZWI or FXNC or LKFN?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: C&F Financial Corporation wins at 1. 16x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHMG or CFFI or CZWI or FXNC or LKFN?
Over the past 5 years, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) delivered a total return of +95.
4%, compared to +10. 5% for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FXNC returned +241. 1% versus LKFN's +142. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHMG or CFFI or CZWI or FXNC or LKFN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 0. 79β — meaning LKFN is approximately 72% more volatile than CZWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 44% for C&F Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHMG or CFFI or CZWI or FXNC or LKFN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First National Corporation (FXNC) is pulling ahead at 27.
1% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First National Corporation grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to -36. 9% for Chemung Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHMG or CFFI or CZWI or FXNC or LKFN?
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
5% net margin versus 10. 8% for Chemung Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKFN leads at 29. 8% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FXNC leads at 74. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHMG or CFFI or CZWI or FXNC or LKFN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 16x versus First National Corporation's 7. 87x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 4x for Lakeland Financial Corporation — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LKFN: 5. 4% to $66. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHMG or CFFI or CZWI or FXNC or LKFN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is CHMG or CFFI or CZWI or FXNC or LKFN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, LKFN: +142. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHMG and CFFI and CZWI and FXNC and LKFN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CFFI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FXNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.