Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC vs PBHC vs CFFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC vs PBHC vs CFFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $331M | $203M | $248M | $85M | $252M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $140M | $90M | $112M | $79M | $186M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $14M | $25M | $-3M | $27M |
| Gross Margin | 64.2% | 54.7% | 68.8% | 38.5% | 69.5% |
| Operating Margin | 14.2% | 7.0% | 24.4% | -5.2% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 9.6x | 11.8x | 8.7x | — | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $52M | $188M | $107M | $116M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $119M | $78M | $12M | $14M |
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC vs PBHC vs CFFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemung Financial C… (CHMG) | 100 | 272.1 | +172.1% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| First United Corpor… (FUNC) | 100 | 277.5 | +177.5% |
| Pathfinder Bancorp,… (PBHC) | 100 | 133.2 | +33.2% |
| C&F Financial Corpo… (CFFI) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC vs PBHC vs CFFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHMG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +54.5% vs PBHC's -3.1%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
FUNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 40.0%
- 289.2% 10Y total return vs CHMG's 198.0%
- PEG 0.77 vs CZWI's 2.32
- 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
PBHC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.20, yield 2.8%
- Beta 0.20, yield 2.8%, current ratio 26.41x
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFFI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.20 vs CHMG's 0.73
CFFI is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.8% vs CZWI's 2.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.9% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.77 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFFI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.20 vs CHMG's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PBHC's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +54.5% vs PBHC's -3.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CFFI's 0.5% |
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC vs PBHC vs CFFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC vs PBHC vs CFFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FUNC leads in 3 of 6 categories
PBHC leads 1 • CHMG leads 0 • CZWI leads 0 • CFFI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FUNC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFFI is the larger business by revenue, generating $186M annually — 2.4x PBHC's $79M. FUNC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PBHC's -4.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $140M | $90M | $112M | $79M | $186M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $9M | $36M | -$2M | $36M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $14M | $25M | -$3M | $27M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $47M | $11M | $16M | $10M | $22M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.2% | +54.7% | +68.8% | +38.5% | +69.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.2% | +7.0% | +24.4% | -5.2% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +16.0% | +18.4% | -4.3% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +11.5% | +18.2% | +13.2% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.8% | +63.0% | +20.2% | -2.6% | +10.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PBHC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, CFFI trades at a 58% valuation discount to CHMG's 22.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FUNC offers better value at 1.08x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $331M | $203M | $248M | $85M | $252M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $314M | $136M | $357M | $181M | $354M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.01x | 14.44x | 12.12x | -25.70x | 9.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.64x | 11.78x | 8.68x | — | 7.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.85x | 1.08x | — | 1.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.73x | 15.28x | 11.52x | — | 10.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.37x | 2.25x | 2.22x | 1.08x | 1.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 1.09x | 1.39x | 0.73x | 0.96x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 163.62x | 19.55x | 12.18x | 8.20x | 11.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FUNC delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-3 for PBHC. CHMG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FUNC's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFI scores 8/9 vs CHMG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +7.8% | +12.5% | -2.8% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.8% | +1.2% | -0.2% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +2.0% | +5.9% | -1.3% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.6% | +0.6% | +8.5% | -0.5% | +2.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.28x | 1.05x | 0.89x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$18M | -$67M | $109M | $96M | $102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $119M | $78M | $12M | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $52M | $188M | $107M | $116M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.44x | 0.16x | 1.01x | -0.13x | 0.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FUNC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FUNC five years ago would be worth $23,452 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,963 for PBHC. Over the past 12 months, CHMG leads with a +54.5% total return vs PBHC's -3.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FUNC at 47.1% vs PBHC's 4.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.0% | +21.5% | +4.4% | -0.3% | +10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +54.5% | +45.6% | +27.8% | -3.1% | +24.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.2% | +160.0% | +218.6% | +12.9% | +66.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +70.4% | +71.2% | +134.5% | +9.6% | +95.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.0% | +157.0% | +289.2% | +46.9% | +144.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.7% | +37.5% | +47.1% | +4.1% | +18.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CHMG and PBHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PBHC is the less volatile stock with a 0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHMG's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHMG currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs PBHC's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.73x | 0.46x | 0.72x | 0.20x | 0.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.83 | $22.62 | $41.95 | $16.50 | $80.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.20 | $12.83 | $28.00 | $12.06 | $57.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +93.2% | +91.0% | +84.1% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.4 | 63.7 | 50.6 | 56.3 | 46.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 40K | 11K | 3K | 4K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CZWI and FUNC and PBHC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CHMG as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", FUNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -27.4% upside for CHMG (target: $50) vs -34.5% for FUNC (target: $25). For income investors, PBHC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.79% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | — | $25.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 2 | 1 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.9% | +1.8% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | $0.37 | $0.82 | $0.39 | $1.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.1% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
FUNC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PBHC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CHMG vs CZWI vs FUNC vs PBHC vs CFFI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHMG or CZWI or FUNC or PBHC or CFFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the stronger pick with 16.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC or PBHC or CFFI?
On trailing P/E, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) is the cheapest at 9.
3x versus Chemung Financial Corporation at 22. 0x. On forward P/E, C&F Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First United Corporation wins at 0. 77x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC or PBHC or CFFI?
Over the past 5 years, First United Corporation (FUNC) delivered a total return of +134.
5%, compared to +9. 6% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (PBHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FUNC returned +289. 2% versus PBHC's +46. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC or PBHC or CFFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.
(PBHC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 20β versus Chemung Financial Corporation's 0. 73β — meaning CHMG is approximately 271% more volatile than PBHC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chemung Financial Corporation (CHMG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 105% for First United Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC or PBHC or CFFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First United Corporation (FUNC) is pulling ahead at 16.
9% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First United Corporation grew EPS 40. 0% year-over-year, compared to -228. 6% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC or PBHC or CFFI?
First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
4% net margin versus -4. 3% for Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FUNC leads at 24. 4% versus -5. 2% for PBHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CFFI leads at 69. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHMG or CZWI or FUNC or PBHC or CFFI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First United Corporation (FUNC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 77x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, C&F Financial Corporation (CFFI) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHMG: -27. 4% to $50. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHMG or CZWI or FUNC or PBHC or CFFI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc. (PBHC) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 1. 8% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI).
09Is CHMG or CZWI or FUNC or PBHC or CFFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pathfinder Bancorp, Inc.
(PBHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 20), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PBHC: +46. 9%, CHMG: +198. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHMG and CZWI and FUNC and PBHC and CFFI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CHMG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FUNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; PBHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CFFI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.