Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs GOTU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Education & Training Services
CHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs GOTU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Entertainment | Entertainment | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $364K | $374.00B | $192.60B | $760M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $311M | $45.18B | $97.26B | $5.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $59M | $10.98B | $11.22B | $-374M |
| Gross Margin | 72.8% | 48.5% | 37.2% | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | 18.4% | 29.5% | 15.5% | -9.1% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 24.5x | 16.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $14.46B | $44.88B | $492M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $242M | $9.03B | $5.70B | $1.32B |
CHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs GOTU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 208.4 | +108.4% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 6.3 | -93.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs GOTU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.62, Low D/E 2.6%, current ratio 11.53x
- Better valuation composite
- 20.8% ROA vs GOTU's -6.8%, ROIC 15.4% vs -47.8%
NFLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 0.39
- Rev growth 15.9%, EPS growth 27.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs DIS's 11.8%
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends and momentum.
- 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- +7.7% vs CHR's -99.2%
GOTU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 56.0% revenue growth vs CHR's 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs CHR's 1.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs GOTU's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs GOTU's 0.99 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs CHR's -99.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.8% ROA vs GOTU's -6.8%, ROIC 15.4% vs -47.8% |
CHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs GOTU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs GOTU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHR leads in 2 of 6 categories
NFLX leads 1 • DIS leads 0 • GOTU leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CHR and NFLX and GOTU each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 313.2x CHR's $311M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GOTU's -6.4%. On growth, GOTU holds the edge at +32.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $311M | $45.2B | $97.3B | $5.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $63M | $30.1B | $20.5B | -$378M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $59M | $11.0B | $11.2B | -$374M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $66M | $9.5B | $7.1B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.8% | +48.5% | +37.2% | +67.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +29.5% | +15.5% | -9.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +24.3% | +11.5% | -6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.2% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.4% | +17.6% | +6.5% | +32.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.1% | +31.1% | -29.8% | +66.7% |
Valuation Metrics
CHR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.1x trailing earnings, CHR trades at a 100% valuation discount to NFLX's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIS's 12.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFLX's 12.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $364,130 | $374.0B | $192.6B | $760M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$232M | $379.4B | $231.8B | $638M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.08x | 34.89x | 15.87x | -4.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.52x | 15.97x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.06x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -6.98x | 12.61x | 12.10x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 8.28x | 2.04x | 1.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 14.32x | 1.72x | 2.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.02x | 39.53x | 19.11x | 64.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-22 for GOTU. CHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFLX's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DIS scores 8/9 vs GOTU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +24.3% | +41.3% | +9.8% | -21.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.8% | +19.8% | +5.6% | -6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.4% | +29.8% | +6.9% | -47.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.8% | +30.5% | +8.5% | -39.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.54x | 0.39x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$233M | $5.4B | $39.2B | -$829M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $242M | $9.0B | $5.7B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $14.5B | $44.9B | $492M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 942.39x | 17.33x | 9.95x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3 for CHR. Over the past 12 months, DIS leads with a +7.7% total return vs CHR's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs CHR's -87.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -57.8% | -3.0% | -2.8% | -19.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | -23.6% | +7.7% | -39.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +166.5% | +8.0% | -32.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +75.2% | -39.8% | -92.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | +875.3% | +11.8% | -81.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -87.8% | +38.6% | +2.6% | -12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NFLX and DIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GOTU's 0.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIS currently trades 87.2% from its 52-week high vs CHR's 0.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.35x | 0.91x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $313.50 | $134.12 | $124.69 | $4.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.25 | $75.01 | $92.19 | $1.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.6% | +65.8% | +87.2% | +43.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.8 | 35.3 | 64.4 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 44.0M | 9.1M | 395K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NFLX as "Buy", DIS as "Buy", GOTU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for GOTU (target: $3) vs 27.3% for DIS (target: $138). DIS is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $115.59 | $138.44 | $2.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 99 | 63 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +1.8% | +4.0% |
CHR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). NFLX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CHR vs NFLX vs DIS vs GOTU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHR or NFLX or DIS or GOTU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR). Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHR or NFLX or DIS or GOTU?
On trailing P/E, Cheer Holding, Inc.
(CHR) is the cheapest at 0. 1x versus Netflix, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, The Walt Disney Company is actually cheaper at 16. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHR or NFLX or DIS or GOTU?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -100. 0% for Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +866. 6% versus CHR's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHR or NFLX or DIS or GOTU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Gaotu Techedu Inc. 's 1. 01β — meaning GOTU is approximately 186% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 54% for Netflix, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHR or NFLX or DIS or GOTU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus 1. 1% for Cheer Holding, Inc. (CHR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHR or NFLX or DIS or GOTU?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -23. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -26. 0% for GOTU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CHR leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHR or NFLX or DIS or GOTU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) trades at 16.
0x forward P/E versus 24. 5x for Netflix, Inc. — 8. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOTU: 49. 2% to $2. 94.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHR or NFLX or DIS or GOTU?
In this comparison, DIS (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. CHR, NFLX, GOTU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CHR or NFLX or DIS or GOTU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), +866. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +866. 6%, GOTU: -81. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHR and NFLX and DIS and GOTU?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHR (Communication Services) and NFLX (Communication Services) and DIS (Communication Services) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CHR is a small-cap deep-value stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock. DIS pays a dividend while CHR, NFLX, GOTU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.