Restaurants
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CHSN vs SBUX vs MCD vs DNUT vs QSR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Restaurants
Restaurants
Grocery Stores
Restaurants
CHSN vs SBUX vs MCD vs DNUT vs QSR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Restaurants | Restaurants | Restaurants | Grocery Stores | Restaurants |
| Market Cap | $50M | $118.83B | $201.63B | $627M | $27.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $35M | $37.70B | $27.45B | $1.51B | $9.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-544K | $1.37B | $8.68B | $-505M | $955M |
| Gross Margin | 42.1% | 20.6% | 44.1% | 13.7% | 33.1% |
| Operating Margin | -6.9% | 9.0% | 46.3% | -28.2% | 25.1% |
| Forward P/E | 73.2x | 44.1x | 21.0x | — | 19.6x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $26.61B | $54.81B | $1.42B | $17.58B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $3.22B | $774M | $-42M | $1.16B |
CHSN vs SBUX vs MCD vs DNUT vs QSR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chanson Internation… (CHSN) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Starbucks Corporati… (SBUX) | 100 | 100.8 | +0.8% |
| McDonald's Corporat… (MCD) | 100 | 98.6 | -1.4% |
| Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
| Restaurant Brands I… (QSR) | 100 | 118.7 | +18.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CHSN vs SBUX vs MCD vs DNUT vs QSR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CHSN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 70.8%, current ratio 1.30x
SBUX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +29.0% vs CHSN's -94.6%
MCD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 27 yrs, beta 0.11, yield 2.5%
- 157.7% 10Y total return vs QSR's 132.2%
- PEG 1.54 vs SBUX's 2.83
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, DNUT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
QSR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and defensive is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.2%
- Beta 0.39, yield 3.1%, current ratio 0.98x
- 12.2% revenue growth vs DNUT's -8.6%
- 3.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% revenue growth vs DNUT's -8.6% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.6% margin vs DNUT's -33.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs DNUT's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs MCD's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs CHSN's -94.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.5% ROA vs DNUT's -19.8%, ROIC 18.7% vs -1.1% |
CHSN vs SBUX vs MCD vs DNUT vs QSR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CHSN vs SBUX vs MCD vs DNUT vs QSR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories
DNUT leads 1 • CHSN leads 0 • SBUX leads 0 • QSR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBUX is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 1066.1x CHSN's $35M. MCD is the more profitable business, keeping 31.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DNUT's -33.4%. On growth, CHSN holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $35M | $37.7B | $27.4B | $1.5B | $9.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$798,646 | $5.1B | $14.4B | -$292M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$543,680 | $1.4B | $8.7B | -$505M | $955M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $2.3B | $7.2B | -$6M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.1% | +20.6% | +44.1% | +13.7% | +33.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +9.0% | +46.3% | -28.2% | +25.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | +3.6% | +31.6% | -33.4% | +10.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +6.2% | +26.2% | -0.4% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.2% | +5.4% | +9.4% | -2.2% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -62.3% | +6.9% | +20.0% | +102.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DNUT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.7x trailing earnings, MCD trades at a 68% valuation discount to CHSN's 73.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MCD offers better value at 1.74x vs QSR's 4.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $50M | $118.8B | $201.6B | $627M | $27.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $51M | $142.2B | $255.7B | $2.1B | $43.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 73.20x | 63.96x | 23.74x | -1.20x | 33.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.15x | 20.96x | — | 19.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.10x | 1.74x | — | 4.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.35x | 27.01x | 17.57x | 20.17x | 17.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.74x | 3.20x | 7.50x | 0.41x | 2.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.26x | — | — | 0.92x | 7.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.91x | 48.66x | 28.06x | — | 18.93x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MCD leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QSR delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-74 for DNUT. CHSN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.71x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QSR's 3.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCD scores 7/9 vs SBUX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | — | — | -74.1% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | +4.2% | +14.5% | -19.8% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.7% | +17.7% | +18.7% | -1.1% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +16.2% | +23.3% | -1.4% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | — | — | 2.10x | 3.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $937,757 | $23.4B | $54.0B | $1.5B | $16.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $3.2B | $774M | -$42M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $26.6B | $54.8B | $1.4B | $17.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -118.15x | 6.03x | 6.09x | -6.61x | 3.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SBUX and MCD and QSR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MCD five years ago would be worth $13,427 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $93 for CHSN. Over the past 12 months, SBUX leads with a +29.0% total return vs CHSN's -94.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QSR at 6.0% vs CHSN's -75.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.5% | +24.9% | -5.8% | -10.8% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -94.6% | +29.0% | -8.6% | -15.9% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.6% | +3.8% | +2.5% | -73.6% | +19.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | +0.8% | +34.3% | -80.2% | +30.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.1% | +114.8% | +157.7% | -80.2% | +132.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -75.8% | +1.3% | +0.8% | -35.8% | +6.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SBUX and MCD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MCD is the less volatile stock with a 0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DNUT's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBUX currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs CHSN's 2.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.88x | 0.98x | 0.12x | 1.60x | 0.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $70.40 | $107.55 | $341.75 | $5.73 | $81.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $77.99 | $282.15 | $2.50 | $61.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.6% | +96.9% | +83.0% | +63.5% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 20.1 | 69.1 | 30.9 | 50.6 | 47.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37.6M | 7.7M | 3.0M | 2.5M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MCD and QSR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SBUX as "Hold", MCD as "Buy", DNUT as "Buy", QSR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.6% upside for DNUT (target: $5) vs 4.1% for SBUX (target: $109). For income investors, QSR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.06% vs DNUT's 1.92%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $108.50 | $347.33 | $4.50 | $83.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 | 62 | 11 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.3% | +2.5% | +1.9% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 16 | 27 | 0 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.43 | $7.14 | $0.07 | $2.42 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% |
MCD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DNUT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CHSN vs SBUX vs MCD vs DNUT vs QSR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CHSN or SBUX or MCD or DNUT or QSR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is the stronger pick with 12. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 6% for Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT). McDonald's Corporation (MCD) offers the better valuation at 23. 7x trailing P/E (21. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McDonald's Corporation (MCD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CHSN or SBUX or MCD or DNUT or QSR?
On trailing P/E, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the cheapest at 23.
7x versus Chanson International Holding at 73. 2x. On forward P/E, Restaurant Brands International Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: McDonald's Corporation wins at 1. 54x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 83x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CHSN or SBUX or MCD or DNUT or QSR?
Over the past 5 years, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) delivered a total return of +34.
3%, compared to -99. 1% for Chanson International Holding (CHSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCD returned +151. 6% versus CHSN's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CHSN or SBUX or MCD or DNUT or QSR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Krispy Kreme, Inc. 's 1. 60β — meaning DNUT is approximately 1258% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Chanson International Holding (CHSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 71% versus 3% for Restaurant Brands International Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CHSN or SBUX or MCD or DNUT or QSR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Restaurant Brands International Inc.
(QSR) is pulling ahead at 12. 2% versus -8. 6% for Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: McDonald's Corporation grew EPS 4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -170. 8% for Krispy Kreme, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QSR leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CHSN or SBUX or MCD or DNUT or QSR?
McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.
9% net margin versus -33. 9% for Krispy Kreme, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 46. 1% versus -2. 9% for CHSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCD leads at 57. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CHSN or SBUX or MCD or DNUT or QSR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 54x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 83x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) trades at 19. 6x forward P/E versus 44. 1x for Starbucks Corporation — 24. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DNUT: 23. 6% to $4. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CHSN or SBUX or MCD or DNUT or QSR?
In this comparison, QSR (3.
1% yield), MCD (2. 5% yield), SBUX (2. 3% yield), DNUT (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. CHSN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CHSN or SBUX or MCD or DNUT or QSR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 5% yield, +151. 6% 10Y return). Krispy Kreme, Inc. (DNUT) carries a higher beta of 1. 60 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +151. 6%, DNUT: -80. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CHSN and SBUX and MCD and DNUT and QSR?
These companies operate in different sectors (CHSN (Consumer Cyclical) and SBUX (Consumer Cyclical) and MCD (Consumer Cyclical) and DNUT (Consumer Defensive) and QSR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CHSN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SBUX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MCD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; DNUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QSR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SBUX, MCD, DNUT, QSR pay a dividend while CHSN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.