Insurance - Life
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CIA vs CSWC vs ARCC vs SNFCA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
Asset Management
Financial - Mortgages
CIA vs CSWC vs ARCC vs SNFCA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Life | Asset Management | Asset Management | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $288M | $1.43B | $13.61B | $251M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $256M | $164M | $3.15B | $344.59B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15M | $103M | $1.15B | $19M |
| Gross Margin | 41.7% | 66.5% | 75.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.1% | 48.5% | 69.7% | — |
| Forward P/E | 18.9x | 10.1x | 9.9x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $956M | $15.99B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $43M | $924M | $0.00 |
CIA vs CSWC vs ARCC vs SNFCA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citizens, Inc. (CIA) | 100 | 93.0 | -7.0% |
| Capital Southwest C… (CSWC) | 100 | 171.6 | +71.6% |
| Ares Capital Corpor… (ARCC) | 100 | 128.5 | +28.5% |
| Security National F… (SNFCA) | 100 | 190.0 | +90.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIA vs CSWC vs ARCC vs SNFCA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIA is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +48.5% vs SNFCA's -1.0%
CSWC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 10.2%
- 234.2% 10Y total return vs SNFCA's 209.4%
- NIM 7.0% vs ARCC's 3.6%
- 43.1% margin vs CIA's 5.7%
ARCC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, current ratio 1.71x
- Beta 0.77, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.71x
- Beta 0.77 vs CIA's 1.21
SNFCA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 42K%, EPS growth 18.9%
- 42K% NII/revenue growth vs CIA's 4.3%
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 9.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42K% NII/revenue growth vs CIA's 4.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 9.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.1% margin vs CIA's 5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs CIA's 1.21 | |
| Dividends | 10.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ARCC's 2.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +48.5% vs SNFCA's -1.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs CIA's 0.8% |
CIA vs CSWC vs ARCC vs SNFCA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CIA vs CSWC vs ARCC vs SNFCA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARCC leads in 1 of 6 categories
SNFCA leads 1 • CIA leads 1 • CSWC leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARCC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNFCA is the larger business by revenue, generating $344.6B annually — 2103.6x CSWC's $164M. CSWC is the more profitable business, keeping 43.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIA's 5.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $256M | $164M | $3.1B | $344.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $142M | $2.0B | $27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15M | $103M | $1.1B | $19M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $23M | -$69M | $1.1B | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.7% | +66.5% | +75.7% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +48.5% | +69.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +43.1% | +41.3% | +9.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | -132.6% | +36.3% | +12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.6% | +113.3% | -63.9% | -36.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SNFCA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.9x trailing earnings, SNFCA trades at a 60% valuation discount to CIA's 19.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ARCC's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CSWC's 27.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $288M | $1.4B | $13.6B | $251M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $283M | $2.3B | $28.7B | $251M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.50x | 16.32x | 10.19x | 7.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.85x | 10.06x | 9.92x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.99x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 27.43x | 13.09x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.13x | 8.71x | 4.33x | 0.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 1.39x | 0.93x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 193.67x | — | 11.92x | 0.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CIA and CSWC and ARCC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSWC delivers a 10.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $5 for SNFCA. CSWC carries lower financial leverage with a 1.08x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARCC's 1.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIA scores 4/9 vs CSWC's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +10.3% | +8.1% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +4.8% | +3.8% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.5% | +5.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +4.6% | +7.5% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.08x | 1.12x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $913M | $15.1B | $0 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $43M | $924M | $0 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $956M | $16.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.91x | 2.98x | 6.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CSWC five years ago would be worth $15,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,923 for CIA. Over the past 12 months, CIA leads with a +48.5% total return vs SNFCA's -1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIA at 48.1% vs ARCC's 10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +11.4% | -4.9% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +48.5% | +34.0% | +0.4% | -1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +225.1% | +75.8% | +34.2% | +38.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.8% | +51.4% | +47.0% | +44.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.9% | +234.2% | +139.2% | +209.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +48.1% | +20.7% | +10.3% | +11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSWC and ARCC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIA's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSWC currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs ARCC's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.21x | 0.84x | 0.77x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.40 | $24.43 | $23.42 | $11.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.25 | $19.37 | $17.40 | $7.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.3% | +98.2% | +81.0% | +90.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 63.7 | 56.7 | 55.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 100K | 664K | 7.5M | 36K |
Analyst Outlook
CSWC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CSWC as "Buy", ARCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for ARCC (target: $22) vs -34.6% for CIA (target: $4). For income investors, CSWC offers the higher dividend yield at 10.20% vs ARCC's 2.02%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.70 | $22.50 | $21.88 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 32 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +10.2% | +2.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.45 | $0.38 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARCC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SNFCA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CIA vs CSWC vs ARCC vs SNFCA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIA or CSWC or ARCC or SNFCA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is the stronger pick with 42061% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4.
3% for Citizens, Inc. (CIA). Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) offers the better valuation at 7. 9x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIA or CSWC or ARCC or SNFCA?
On trailing P/E, Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is the cheapest at 7.
9x versus Citizens, Inc. at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Ares Capital Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIA or CSWC or ARCC or SNFCA?
Over the past 5 years, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) delivered a total return of +51.
4%, compared to -0. 8% for Citizens, Inc. (CIA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CSWC returned +234. 2% versus CIA's -24. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIA or CSWC or ARCC or SNFCA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
77β versus Citizens, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning CIA is approximately 57% more volatile than ARCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 108% versus 112% for Ares Capital Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIA or CSWC or ARCC or SNFCA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Security National Financial Corporation (SNFCA) is pulling ahead at 42061% versus 4.
3% for Citizens, Inc. (CIA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Security National Financial Corporation grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to -28. 3% for Capital Southwest Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIA or CSWC or ARCC or SNFCA?
Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
1% net margin versus 5. 7% for Citizens, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARCC leads at 69. 7% versus 0. 0% for SNFCA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARCC leads at 75. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIA or CSWC or ARCC or SNFCA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) trades at 9.
9x forward P/E versus 18. 9x for Citizens, Inc. — 8. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ARCC: 15. 4% to $21. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIA or CSWC or ARCC or SNFCA?
In this comparison, CSWC (10.
2% yield), ARCC (2. 0% yield) pay a dividend. CIA, SNFCA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CIA or CSWC or ARCC or SNFCA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Capital Southwest Corporation (CSWC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
84), 10. 2% yield, +234. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSWC: +234. 2%, CIA: -24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIA and CSWC and ARCC and SNFCA?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSWC is a small-cap deep-value stock; ARCC is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SNFCA is a small-cap high-growth stock. CSWC, ARCC pay a dividend while CIA, SNFCA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.