Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $517M | $522M | $2.35B | $4.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $255M | $314M | $867M | $1.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $46M | $26M | $169M | $392M |
| Gross Margin | 66.4% | 50.9% | 72.1% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 21.7% | 10.9% | 25.3% | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.8x | 13.3x | 10.8x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $284M | $517M | $327M | $1.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $77M | $231M | $185M | $271M |
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civista Bancshares,… (CIVB) | 100 | 164.0 | +64.0% |
| HarborOne Bancorp, … (HONE) | 100 | 151.8 | +51.8% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 191.8 | +91.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CIVB is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.8x vs 13.3x)
HONE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 78.4%
- 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage
FULT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 106.1% 10Y total return vs CIVB's 163.4%
- PEG 0.76 vs CIVB's 1.55
- NIM 3.2% vs HONE's 2.2%
- 3.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs FULT's 5.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.8x vs 13.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.6% vs HONE's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FULT leads in 2 of 6 categories
CIVB leads 1 • NBTB leads 1 • HONE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 7.4x CIVB's $255M. FULT is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HONE's 8.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $255M | $314M | $867M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $56M | $37M | $241M | $529M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $46M | $26M | $169M | $392M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $46M | $225M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.4% | +50.9% | +72.1% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +10.9% | +25.3% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | +8.7% | +19.5% | +20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +0.8% | +25.2% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.2% | +11.1% | +39.5% | +47.2% |
Valuation Metrics
CIVB leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, CIVB trades at a 48% valuation discount to HONE's 18.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.74x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $517M | $522M | $2.4B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $724M | $808M | $2.5B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.46x | 18.33x | 13.53x | 10.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.85x | 13.30x | 10.80x | 10.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.66x | 1.23x | 1.92x | 0.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.11x | 20.84x | 10.35x | 9.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.03x | 1.66x | 2.71x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 0.87x | 1.21x | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.72x | 200.70x | 10.75x | 14.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FULT delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $5 for HONE. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HONE's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NBTB scores 7/9 vs FULT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +4.6% | +9.5% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.5% | +1.1% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.0% | +2.3% | +7.9% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +3.5% | +2.4% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.90x | 0.17x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $207M | $285M | $142M | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $77M | $231M | $185M | $271M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $284M | $517M | $327M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.67x | 0.24x | 1.05x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FULT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FULT five years ago would be worth $14,141 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,418 for HONE. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +29.6% total return vs HONE's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 32.1% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.8% | — | +9.3% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +12.7% | +7.9% | +9.0% | +29.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +87.9% | +58.9% | +54.1% | +130.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.4% | -5.8% | +29.9% | +41.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.4% | +88.3% | +102.2% | +106.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.4% | +16.7% | +15.5% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CIVB and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NBTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs HONE's 84.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.04x | 0.88x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.31 | $14.29 | $46.92 | $22.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.95 | $10.57 | $39.20 | $16.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.2% | +84.7% | +96.1% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 32.5 | 57.3 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 84K | 0 | 236K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and FULT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CIVB as "Buy", HONE as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", FULT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for HONE (target: $14) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FULT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.59% vs HONE's 2.61%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $14.00 | $46.00 | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 6 | 10 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +2.6% | +3.2% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 5 | 12 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.68 | $0.32 | $1.43 | $0.77 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +4.1% | +0.4% | +1.6% |
FULT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CIVB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CIVB vs HONE vs NBTB vs FULT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.
(HONE) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (8. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT?
On trailing P/E, Civista Bancshares, Inc.
(CIVB) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, Civista Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus Civista Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT?
Over the past 5 years, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) delivered a total return of +41.
4%, compared to -5. 8% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. (HONE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIVB returned +163. 5% versus HONE's +88. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Civista Bancshares, Inc.
(CIVB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 12β — meaning FULT is approximately 30% more volatile than CIVB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 90% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HarborOne Bancorp, Inc.
(HONE) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus 5. 0% for Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 78. 4% year-over-year, compared to 12. 5% for NBT Bancorp Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT?
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
7% net margin versus 8. 7% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FULT leads at 25. 7% versus 10. 9% for HONE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus Civista Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Civista Bancshares, Inc. (CIVB) trades at 8. 8x forward P/E versus 13. 3x for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HONE: 15. 7% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 6% for HarborOne Bancorp, Inc. (HONE).
09Is CIVB or HONE or NBTB or FULT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Civista Bancshares, Inc.
(CIVB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 86), 2. 7% yield, +163. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CIVB: +163. 5%, FULT: +106. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CIVB and HONE and NBTB and FULT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CIVB is a small-cap deep-value stock; HONE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.