Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CLWT vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
Regulated Water
CLWT vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Regulated Water | Regulated Water | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $10M | $529M | $955M | $421M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33M | $132M | $199M | $-18M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $18M | $44M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 36.6% | 33.3% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 139015.1% | 28.1% | 35.8% |
| Forward P/E | 13.2x | 31.6x | 20.1x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $92K | $708.60B | $419M | $232M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $123.79T | $3M | $1K |
CLWT vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Euro Tech Holdings … (CLWT) | 100 | 123.8 | +23.8% |
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 223.7 | +123.7% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 75.8 | -24.2% |
| The York Water Comp… (YORW) | 100 | 65.7 | -34.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CLWT vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CLWT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 164.8% 10Y total return vs CWCO's 155.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 2.30x
- Lower P/E (13.2x vs 20.1x)
- 12.8% ROA vs CWCO's 0.0%, ROIC 2.6% vs 26.6%
CWCO is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.76, yield 100.0%, current ratio 6.12x
- 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs YORW's 3.0%
- +47.9% vs MSEX's -12.8%
MSEX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
YORW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.08, yield 3.0%
- Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth -2.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.9%
- PEG 9.89 vs MSEX's 12.58
- 3.4% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.4% revenue growth vs CLWT's -14.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.2x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.9% margin vs CLWT's 7.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs CWCO's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs YORW's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +47.9% vs MSEX's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs CWCO's 0.0%, ROIC 2.6% vs 26.6% |
CLWT vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CLWT vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CWCO leads in 2 of 6 categories
YORW leads 1 • CLWT leads 1 • MSEX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YORW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSEX and YORW operate at a comparable scale, with $199M and -$18M in trailing revenue. YORW is the more profitable business, keeping 25.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLWT's 7.7%. On growth, MSEX holds the edge at +10.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $33M | $132M | $199M | -$18M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $292,750 | $25.98T | $81M | $42M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $18M | $44M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $691,000 | $33.67T | -$19M | -$30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +36.6% | +33.3% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +139015.1% | +28.1% | +35.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +13.9% | +22.1% | +25.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +254916.5% | -9.7% | -24.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -18.6% | +4.4% | +10.0% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.9% | -11.5% | -100.0% | +32.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CWCO leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.2x trailing earnings, CLWT trades at a 40% valuation discount to MSEX's 21.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), YORW offers better value at 11.52x vs MSEX's 13.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $529M | $955M | $421M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | -$123.08T | $1.4B | $653M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.16x | — | 21.78x | 20.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 31.60x | 20.12x | 18.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 13.62x | 11.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.16x | -4.74x | 15.79x | 15.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.62x | 4.01x | 4.91x | 5.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.58x | 0.00x | 1.89x | 1.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.27x | 0.00x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CLWT delivers a 16.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $0 for CWCO. CWCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to YORW's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLWT scores 7/9 vs YORW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.2% | 0.0% | +9.1% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.8% | 0.0% | +3.2% | +3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +26.6% | +4.7% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.3% | +16.0% | +4.4% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.00x | 0.85x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$123.08T | $416M | $232M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $123.79T | $3M | $1,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $92,000 | $708.6B | $419M | $232M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 74.42x | — | 4.33x | 1.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CWCO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CWCO five years ago would be worth $29,742 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,799 for YORW. Over the past 12 months, CWCO leads with a +47.9% total return vs MSEX's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CWCO at 26.3% vs YORW's -9.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.2% | -3.9% | +3.0% | -7.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.7% | +47.9% | -12.8% | -9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.5% | +101.4% | -25.2% | -25.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.1% | +197.4% | -28.4% | -32.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.8% | +155.1% | +62.9% | +25.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.3% | +26.3% | -9.2% | -9.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CWCO's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CWCO currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs CLWT's 76.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 0.76x | -0.12x | 0.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.63 | $39.12 | $62.18 | $35.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $22.69 | $44.17 | $28.26 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.7% | +84.8% | +82.7% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.5 | 47.9 | 44.1 | 34.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5K | 163K | 160K | 174K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWCO and YORW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CWCO as "Buy", MSEX as "Buy", YORW as "Hold". For income investors, CWCO offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MSEX's 2.67%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $53.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.4% | +100.0% | +2.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 21 | 31 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.08 | $497756.41 | $1.37 | $0.88 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CWCO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). YORW leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CLWT vs CWCO vs MSEX vs YORW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CLWT or CWCO or MSEX or YORW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The York Water Company (YORW) is the stronger pick with 3.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) offers the better valuation at 13. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CLWT or CWCO or MSEX or YORW?
On trailing P/E, Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT) is the cheapest at 13.
2x versus Middlesex Water Company at 21. 8x. On forward P/E, The York Water Company is actually cheaper at 18. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The York Water Company wins at 9. 89x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CLWT or CWCO or MSEX or YORW?
Over the past 5 years, Consolidated Water Co.
Ltd. (CWCO) delivered a total return of +197. 4%, compared to -32. 0% for The York Water Company (YORW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLWT returned +164. 8% versus YORW's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CLWT or CWCO or MSEX or YORW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. 's 0. 76β — meaning CWCO is approximately -712% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 97% for The York Water Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CLWT or CWCO or MSEX or YORW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The York Water Company (YORW) is pulling ahead at 3.
4% versus -14. 3% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (CLWT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The York Water Company grew EPS -2. 1% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWCO leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CLWT or CWCO or MSEX or YORW?
The York Water Company (YORW) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus 4. 8% for Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus 2. 5% for CLWT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — YORW leads at 54. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CLWT or CWCO or MSEX or YORW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The York Water Company (YORW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 9. 89x versus Middlesex Water Company's 12. 58x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The York Water Company (YORW) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — CLWT or CWCO or MSEX or YORW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 7% for Middlesex Water Company (MSEX).
09Is CLWT or CWCO or MSEX or YORW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
12), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +62. 9%, CWCO: +155. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CLWT and CWCO and MSEX and YORW?
These companies operate in different sectors (CLWT (Industrials) and CWCO (Utilities) and MSEX (Utilities) and YORW (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CLWT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; YORW is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.