Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CMA vs CFG vs RF vs ZION
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CMA vs CFG vs RF vs ZION — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $11.35B | $28.31B | $24.49B | $9.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.80B | $12.35B | $9.61B | $4.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $723M | $1.70B | $2.16B | $852M |
| Gross Margin | 68.1% | 57.6% | 74.6% | 61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 19.1% | 15.3% | 28.5% | 20.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.5x | 12.7x | 10.8x | 9.9x |
| Total Debt | $5.42B | $12.40B | $4.88B | $4.37B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $866M | $11.24B | $10.91B | $3.50B |
CMA vs CFG vs RF vs ZION — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comerica Incorporat… (CMA) | 100 | 243.9 | +143.9% |
| Citizens Financial … (CFG) | 100 | 261.3 | +161.3% |
| Regions Financial C… (RF) | 100 | 252.0 | +152.0% |
| Zions Bancorporatio… (ZION) | 100 | 182.0 | +82.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMA vs CFG vs RF vs ZION
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CFG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +76.5% vs RF's +41.3%
RF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.10, yield 3.7%
- 284.7% 10Y total return vs CFG's 260.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 25.6%, current ratio 0.30x
- PEG 0.62 vs ZION's 2.81
ZION carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 13.8%
- 8.0% NII/revenue growth vs CMA's -3.9%
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 16.5x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CMA's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.0% NII/revenue growth vs CMA's -3.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CMA's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.10 vs ZION's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs CFG's 2.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.5% vs RF's +41.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CMA's 0.5% |
CMA vs CFG vs RF vs ZION — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMA vs CFG vs RF vs ZION — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RF leads in 3 of 6 categories
CFG leads 1 • CMA leads 0 • ZION leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RF leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CFG is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.3B annually — 2.6x CMA's $4.8B. RF is the more profitable business, keeping 22.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CFG's 12.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.8B | $12.3B | $9.6B | $5.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $989M | $2.6B | $2.8B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $723M | $1.7B | $2.2B | $852M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $413M | $2.7B | $2.1B | $961M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +68.1% | +57.6% | +74.6% | +61.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.1% | +15.3% | +28.5% | +20.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.1% | +12.2% | +22.4% | +15.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +15.2% | +22.7% | +21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +38.2% | +3.6% | +8.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RF and ZION each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.3x trailing earnings, RF trades at a 43% valuation discount to CFG's 21.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RF offers better value at 0.71x vs ZION's 3.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.3B | $28.3B | $24.5B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.9B | $29.5B | $18.5B | $10.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.76x | 21.66x | 12.32x | 12.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.51x | 12.66x | 10.79x | 9.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.86x | — | 0.71x | 3.65x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.08x | 12.35x | 6.58x | 9.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.37x | 2.29x | 2.55x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.53x | 1.23x | 1.30x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.07x | 11.23x | 9.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RF leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ZION delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $7 for CFG. RF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZION's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RF scores 9/9 vs CMA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +6.6% | +11.3% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.4% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +3.8% | +8.5% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.0% | +4.4% | +9.6% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.51x | 0.26x | 0.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4.6B | $1.2B | -$6.0B | $866M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $866M | $11.2B | $10.9B | $3.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.4B | $12.4B | $4.9B | $4.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.64x | 0.55x | 1.32x | 0.68x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CFG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CFG five years ago would be worth $15,060 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,192 for ZION. Over the past 12 months, CFG leads with a +76.5% total return vs RF's +41.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ZION at 41.7% vs RF's 23.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.0% | +12.0% | +3.3% | +8.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +65.7% | +76.5% | +41.3% | +44.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.9% | +174.8% | +90.0% | +184.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +30.6% | +50.6% | +43.7% | +21.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +164.0% | +260.3% | +284.7% | +195.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.7% | +40.1% | +23.9% | +41.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RF and ZION each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RF is the less volatile stock with a 1.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ZION's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ZION currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs CMA's 89.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.33x | 1.10x | 1.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $99.41 | $68.79 | $31.53 | $66.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $54.42 | $37.93 | $20.67 | $45.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.2% | +95.4% | +89.5% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 54.7 | 53.8 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 49.2M | 4.6M | 11.9M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
RF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMA as "Hold", CFG as "Buy", RF as "Hold", ZION as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for CMA (target: $103) vs 6.1% for ZION (target: $68). For income investors, RF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.67% vs CFG's 2.58%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.00 | $72.42 | $30.78 | $67.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 62 | 38 | 52 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.6% | +3.7% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 3 | 13 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.70 | $1.04 | $1.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.8% | +4.4% | +4.3% |
RF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CFG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CMA vs CFG vs RF vs ZION: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMA or CFG or RF or ZION a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) is the stronger pick with 8.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Comerica Incorporated (CMA). Regions Financial Corporation (RF) offers the better valuation at 12. 3x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMA or CFG or RF or ZION?
On trailing P/E, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is the cheapest at 12.
3x versus Citizens Financial Group, Inc. at 21. 7x. On forward P/E, Zions Bancorporation, National Association is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Regions Financial Corporation wins at 0. 62x versus Zions Bancorporation, National Association's 2. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMA or CFG or RF or ZION?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
(CFG) delivered a total return of +50. 6%, compared to +21. 9% for Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RF returned +284. 7% versus CMA's +164. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMA or CFG or RF or ZION?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
10β versus Zions Bancorporation, National Association's 1. 37β — meaning ZION is approximately 24% more volatile than RF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 71% for Zions Bancorporation, National Association — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMA or CFG or RF or ZION?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) is pulling ahead at 8.
0% versus -3. 9% for Comerica Incorporated (CMA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Regions Financial Corporation grew EPS 18. 7% year-over-year, compared to -3. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMA or CFG or RF or ZION?
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
4% net margin versus 12. 2% for Citizens Financial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RF leads at 28. 5% versus 15. 3% for CFG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RF leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMA or CFG or RF or ZION more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 62x versus Zions Bancorporation, National Association's 2. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for Comerica Incorporated — 6. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMA: 16. 2% to $103. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMA or CFG or RF or ZION?
In this comparison, RF (3.
7% yield), ZION (2. 6% yield), CFG (2. 6% yield) pay a dividend. CMA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMA or CFG or RF or ZION better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
10), 3. 7% yield, +284. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RF: +284. 7%, CMA: +164. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMA and CFG and RF and ZION?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CFG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ZION is a small-cap deep-value stock. CFG, RF, ZION pay a dividend while CMA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.