Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CMCO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs HSII vs MAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
CMCO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs HSII vs MAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $454M | $790M | $349M | $1.23B | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.00B | $1.33B | $3.09B | $1.21B | $17.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $35M | $-266M | $37M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 33.6% | 27.2% | 26.3% | 23.3% | 16.7% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 3.8% | -2.8% | 3.0% | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | 18.0x | 11.0x | 16.7x | 8.3x |
| Total Debt | $541M | $70M | $159M | $101M | $2.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $54M | $2M | $33M | $516M | $871M |
CMCO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs HSII vs MAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbus McKinnon C… (CMCO) | 100 | 52.0 | -48.0% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 64.7 | -35.3% |
| Heidrick & Struggle… (HSII) | 100 | 265.4 | +165.4% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 44.0 | -56.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMCO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs HSII vs MAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMCO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 8.3x)
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs CMCO's 2.32, lower leverage
Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HSII carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth -84.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.4%
- 240.0% 10Y total return vs KFRC's 195.5%
- 7.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 3.1% margin vs KELYA's -8.6%
MAN is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 8.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.1% margin vs KELYA's -8.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs CMCO's 2.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield, vs KFRC's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.2% vs MAN's -17.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 19.1% vs -4.0% |
CMCO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs HSII vs MAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMCO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs HSII vs MAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MAN leads in 1 of 6 categories
KFRC leads 1 • HSII leads 1 • CMCO leads 0 • KELYA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CMCO and HSII each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 17.9x CMCO's $1.0B. HSII is the more profitable business, keeping 3.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -8.6%. On growth, HSII holds the edge at +14.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $1.3B | $3.1B | $1.2B | $18.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $56M | -$54M | $57M | $236M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $35M | -$266M | $37M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40M | $43M | $66M | $132M | -$161M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.6% | +27.2% | +26.3% | +23.3% | +16.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +3.8% | -2.8% | +3.0% | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.6% | +2.6% | -8.6% | +3.1% | -0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.0% | +3.3% | +2.1% | +10.9% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.5% | +0.1% | -100.0% | +14.2% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | +2.2% | -2.1% | +16.9% | +36.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, KFRC trades at a 85% valuation discount to HSII's 143.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HSII's 30.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $454M | $790M | $349M | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $941M | $858M | $475M | $812M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -87.78x | 22.05x | -1.34x | 143.93x | -104.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.39x | 17.96x | 10.96x | 16.72x | 8.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.16x | 15.42x | — | 30.78x | 9.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.59x | 0.08x | 1.10x | 0.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.51x | 6.17x | 0.35x | 2.76x | 0.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.76x | 16.88x | 3.06x | 9.88x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HSII scores 6/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.7% | +27.2% | -24.6% | +7.3% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | +9.2% | -11.3% | +2.9% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +19.1% | -4.0% | +6.0% | +5.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +20.1% | -4.3% | +1.1% | +6.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.61x | 0.56x | 0.16x | 0.22x | 1.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $487M | $68M | $126M | -$415M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54M | $2M | $33M | $516M | $871M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $541M | $70M | $159M | $101M | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.70x | — | -12.07x | — | 1.98x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSII leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSII five years ago would be worth $14,577 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,278 for CMCO. Over the past 12 months, HSII leads with a +46.2% total return vs MAN's -17.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HSII at 34.9% vs CMCO's -21.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.3% | +39.2% | +13.1% | — | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.8% | +18.9% | -12.2% | +46.2% | -17.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.7% | -13.8% | -34.2% | +145.7% | -46.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.2% | -16.8% | -58.3% | +45.8% | -64.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.3% | +195.5% | -33.0% | +240.0% | -30.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.5% | -4.8% | -13.0% | +34.9% | -18.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KFRC and HSII each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMCO's 2.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSII currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs MAN's 64.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.32x | 0.53x | 1.01x | 0.76x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.40 | $47.48 | $14.94 | $59.05 | $47.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.39 | $24.49 | $7.98 | $39.84 | $25.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.8% | +91.0% | +64.9% | +99.9% | +64.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.7 | 65.6 | 63.7 | 77.9 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 372K | 305K | 361K | 0 | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFRC and MAN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMCO as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", KELYA as "Buy", HSII as "Hold", MAN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -0.0% for HSII (target: $59). For income investors, MAN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.71% vs HSII's 1.03%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $20.00 | $71.00 | $15.00 | $59.00 | $37.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +3.6% | +3.2% | +1.0% | +4.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $1.55 | $0.31 | $0.61 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +6.4% | +3.5% | +0.3% | +2.7% |
MAN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). KFRC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CMCO vs KFRC vs KELYA vs HSII vs MAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMCO or KFRC or KELYA or HSII or MAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMCO or KFRC or KELYA or HSII or MAN?
On trailing P/E, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. at 143. 9x. On forward P/E, Columbus McKinnon Corporation is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMCO or KFRC or KELYA or HSII or MAN?
Over the past 5 years, Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) delivered a total return of +45. 8%, compared to -67. 2% for Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSII returned +240. 0% versus KELYA's -33. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMCO or KFRC or KELYA or HSII or MAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Columbus McKinnon Corporation's 2. 32β — meaning CMCO is approximately 339% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMCO or KFRC or KELYA or HSII or MAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc.
(HSII) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kforce Inc. grew EPS -25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HSII leads at 3. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMCO or KFRC or KELYA or HSII or MAN?
Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CMCO leads at 5. 7% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CMCO leads at 33. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMCO or KFRC or KELYA or HSII or MAN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) trades at 7.
4x forward P/E versus 18. 0x for Kforce Inc. — 10. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMCO or KFRC or KELYA or HSII or MAN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) offers the highest yield at 4. 7%, versus 1. 0% for Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc. (HSII).
09Is CMCO or KFRC or KELYA or HSII or MAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Columbus McKinnon Corporation (CMCO) carries a higher beta of 2. 32 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, CMCO: +22. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMCO and KFRC and KELYA and HSII and MAN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CMCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KELYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HSII is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.