Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CMPR vs SSTK vs QUAD vs SHOP vs ETSY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Internet Content & Information
Specialty Business Services
Software - Application
Specialty Retail
CMPR vs SSTK vs QUAD vs SHOP vs ETSY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information | Specialty Business Services | Software - Application | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $2.23B | $624M | $400M | $145.00B | $6.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.56B | $946M | $2.37B | $12.37B | $2.86B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $23M | $-21M | $27M | $1.33B | $285M |
| Gross Margin | 47.0% | 57.5% | 18.5% | 48.0% | 72.0% |
| Operating Margin | 6.8% | 3.9% | 5.0% | 13.3% | 14.3% |
| Forward P/E | 28.0x | 13.6x | 6.3x | 60.9x | 18.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.71B | $318M | $444M | $188M | $742M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $234M | $178M | $63M | $1.53B | $1.40B |
CMPR vs SSTK vs QUAD vs SHOP vs ETSY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cimpress plc (CMPR) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
| Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK) | 100 | 44.8 | -55.2% |
| Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) | 100 | 268.8 | +168.8% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 147.5 | +47.5% |
| Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) | 100 | 79.0 | -21.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CMPR vs SSTK vs QUAD vs SHOP vs ETSY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CMPR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +122.6% vs SSTK's +5.7%
SSTK is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.48, yield 7.6%
- 7.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs QUAD's 3.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
QUAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, current ratio 0.86x
- Beta 1.03, yield 3.8%, current ratio 0.86x
- Lower P/E (6.3x vs 18.5x)
- Beta 1.03 vs SHOP's 2.64
SHOP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 30.1%, EPS growth -39.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 41.2% 10Y total return vs QUAD's -23.3%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs QUAD's -9.4%
- 10.8% margin vs SSTK's -2.2%
ETSY is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 10.6% ROA vs SSTK's -1.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs QUAD's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.3x vs 18.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs SSTK's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs SHOP's 2.64 | |
| Dividends | 7.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs QUAD's 3.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +122.6% vs SSTK's +5.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.6% ROA vs SSTK's -1.5% |
CMPR vs SSTK vs QUAD vs SHOP vs ETSY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CMPR vs SSTK vs QUAD vs SHOP vs ETSY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SSTK leads in 2 of 6 categories
ETSY leads 1 • QUAD leads 1 • CMPR leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETSY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHOP is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.4B annually — 13.1x SSTK's $946M. SHOP is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSTK's -2.2%. On growth, SHOP holds the edge at +34.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $946M | $2.4B | $12.4B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $387M | $118M | $196M | $1.7B | $508M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $23M | -$21M | $27M | $1.3B | $285M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $193M | $114M | $44M | $2.1B | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.0% | +57.5% | +18.5% | +48.0% | +72.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +3.9% | +5.0% | +13.3% | +14.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -2.2% | +1.2% | +10.8% | +9.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.4% | +12.0% | +1.9% | +17.2% | +23.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.0% | -17.9% | -7.7% | +34.3% | +3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.4% | -3.5% | +18.2% | +15.1% | +2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SSTK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, SSTK trades at a 91% valuation discount to CMPR's 158.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SSTK's 3.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHOP's 95.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $624M | $400M | $145.0B | $6.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $763M | $781M | $143.7B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 158.59x | 13.59x | 14.19x | 118.87x | 46.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.96x | — | 6.30x | 60.91x | 18.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.06x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.09x | 3.80x | 3.96x | 95.83x | 11.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 0.63x | 0.17x | 12.55x | 2.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.06x | 2.97x | 10.82x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.41x | 5.04x | 7.90x | 72.25x | 9.51x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SHOP and ETSY each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QUAD delivers a 25.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-4 for SSTK. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QUAD's 3.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SSTK scores 8/9 vs ETSY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -3.6% | +25.0% | +10.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | -1.5% | +2.2% | +9.0% | +10.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.8% | +11.5% | +17.9% | +9.4% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.6% | +15.6% | +19.3% | +11.4% | +22.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.55x | 3.45x | 0.01x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | $139M | $381M | -$1.3B | -$653M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $234M | $178M | $63M | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $318M | $444M | $188M | $742M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.95x | 1.71x | 2.11x | — | 27.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QUAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QUAD five years ago would be worth $25,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,654 for SSTK. Over the past 12 months, CMPR leads with a +122.6% total return vs SSTK's +5.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QUAD at 43.8% vs SSTK's -27.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.1% | -7.2% | +33.6% | -28.9% | +11.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +122.6% | +5.7% | +44.4% | +18.2% | +39.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.6% | -61.2% | +197.1% | +73.6% | -31.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | -73.5% | +158.1% | +0.8% | -61.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.9% | -34.5% | -23.3% | +4123.0% | +681.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.7% | -27.1% | +43.8% | +20.2% | -11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CMPR and QUAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QUAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CMPR currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs SSTK's 57.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.48x | 1.03x | 2.64x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.02 | $29.50 | $8.64 | $182.19 | $76.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.44 | $14.73 | $5.01 | $88.14 | $44.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +57.6% | +88.7% | +61.3% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.5 | 44.0 | 50.6 | 34.7 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 120K | 265K | 231K | 8.7M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
SSTK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CMPR as "Hold", SSTK as "Hold", QUAD as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy", ETSY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 294.5% upside for SSTK (target: $67) vs 4.4% for QUAD (target: $8). For income investors, SSTK offers the higher dividend yield at 7.55% vs QUAD's 3.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.50 | $67.00 | $8.00 | $164.75 | $70.07 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 18 | 7 | 63 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.6% | +3.8% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.28 | $0.29 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.5% | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% | +12.8% |
SSTK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ETSY leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
CMPR vs SSTK vs QUAD vs SHOP vs ETSY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CMPR or SSTK or QUAD or SHOP or ETSY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD). Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CMPR or SSTK or QUAD or SHOP or ETSY?
On trailing P/E, Shutterstock, Inc.
(SSTK) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Cimpress plc at 158. 6x. On forward P/E, Quad/Graphics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CMPR or SSTK or QUAD or SHOP or ETSY?
Over the past 5 years, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) delivered a total return of +158. 1%, compared to -73. 5% for Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +41. 2% versus SSTK's -34. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CMPR or SSTK or QUAD or SHOP or ETSY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 64β — meaning SHOP is approximately 156% more volatile than QUAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CMPR or SSTK or QUAD or SHOP or ETSY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus -9. 4% for Quad/Graphics, Inc. (QUAD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Quad/Graphics, Inc. grew EPS 150. 5% year-over-year, compared to -91. 0% for Cimpress plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CMPR or SSTK or QUAD or SHOP or ETSY?
Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 7% net margin versus 0. 4% for Cimpress plc — meaning it keeps 10. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ETSY leads at 12. 8% versus 4. 9% for QUAD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETSY leads at 71. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CMPR or SSTK or QUAD or SHOP or ETSY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) trades at 6. 3x forward P/E versus 60. 9x for Shopify Inc. — 54. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SSTK: 294. 5% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CMPR or SSTK or QUAD or SHOP or ETSY?
In this comparison, SSTK (7.
6% yield), QUAD (3. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CMPR, SHOP, ETSY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CMPR or SSTK or QUAD or SHOP or ETSY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Quad/Graphics, Inc.
(QUAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), 3. 8% yield). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QUAD: -23. 3%, SHOP: +41. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CMPR and SSTK and QUAD and SHOP and ETSY?
These companies operate in different sectors (CMPR (Communication Services) and SSTK (Communication Services) and QUAD (Industrials) and SHOP (Technology) and ETSY (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CMPR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSTK is a small-cap deep-value stock; QUAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ETSY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SSTK, QUAD pay a dividend while CMPR, SHOP, ETSY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 28%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 34%
- Dividend Yield > 3.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.