Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CNTM vs STEM vs NRGV vs ARRY vs ENPH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Renewable Utilities
Solar
Solar
CNTM vs STEM vs NRGV vs ARRY vs ENPH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Renewable Utilities | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $14M | $74M | $716M | $1.25B | $4.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36M | $153M | $217M | $1.21B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $144M | $-115M | $-67M | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 36.3% | 22.1% | 22.4% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | -33.6% | -35.1% | -35.8% | 4.5% | 6.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 11.7x | 17.6x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $369M | $95M | $766M | $1.24B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $49M | $58M | $244M | $474M |
CNTM vs STEM vs NRGV vs ARRY vs ENPH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ConnectM Technology… (CNTM) | 100 | 53.1 | -46.9% |
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| Energy Vault Holdin… (NRGV) | 100 | 485.5 | +385.5% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 75.4 | -24.6% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 33.1 | -66.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNTM vs STEM vs NRGV vs ARRY vs ENPH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNTM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.25
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 81.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.4%
- -46.7% 10Y total return vs ENPH's 17.4%
- Beta 0.25 vs STEM's 3.66
STEM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- 94.2% margin vs NRGV's -53.0%
- 43.2% ROA vs CNTM's -70.0%, ROIC -57.1% vs -428.6%
NRGV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 340.9% revenue growth vs STEM's 8.1%
- +447.1% vs CNTM's -57.4%
ARRY is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 17.6x)
ENPH is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 340.9% revenue growth vs STEM's 8.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 17.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.2% margin vs NRGV's -53.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs STEM's 3.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +447.1% vs CNTM's -57.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 43.2% ROA vs CNTM's -70.0%, ROIC -57.1% vs -428.6% |
CNTM vs STEM vs NRGV vs ARRY vs ENPH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CNTM vs STEM vs NRGV vs ARRY vs ENPH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ENPH leads in 2 of 6 categories
ARRY leads 1 • NRGV leads 1 • CNTM leads 0 • STEM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 39.1x CNTM's $36M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NRGV's -53.0%. On growth, NRGV holds the edge at +156.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36M | $153M | $217M | $1.2B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$16M | -$72M | $95M | $171M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $144M | -$115M | -$67M | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$8M | -$98M | $58M | $145M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +36.3% | +22.1% | +22.4% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -33.6% | -35.1% | -35.8% | +4.5% | +6.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -45.3% | +94.2% | -53.0% | -5.6% | +9.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -27.7% | -5.5% | -45.2% | +4.8% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.9% | -10.8% | +156.4% | -26.1% | -20.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -103.1% | +27.2% | -42.9% | -7.0% | -127.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ARRY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ARRY's 13.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ENPH's 22.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $74M | $716M | $1.3B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $394M | $752M | $1.8B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.85x | -0.95x | -6.37x | -11.23x | 27.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 11.75x | 17.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 4.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 13.50x | 22.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.38x | 0.48x | 3.52x | 0.98x | 3.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.61x | — | 7.50x | 4.80x | 4.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.82x | — | 15.72x | 48.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-10 for CNTM. NRGV carries lower financial leverage with a 1.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNTM's 8.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STEM scores 6/9 vs CNTM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.3% | — | -146.8% | -20.6% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -70.0% | +43.2% | -40.3% | -4.4% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.3% | -57.1% | -49.5% | +9.0% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.7% | -23.9% | -53.7% | +8.2% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.84x | — | 1.07x | 2.94x | 1.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $320M | $36M | $522M | $769M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $49M | $58M | $244M | $474M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $369M | $95M | $766M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.45x | 14.43x | -10.33x | -2.42x | 47.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NRGV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNTM five years ago would be worth $5,333 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $217 for STEM. Over the past 12 months, NRGV leads with a +447.1% total return vs CNTM's -57.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NRGV at 34.0% vs STEM's -52.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -56.4% | -48.6% | -15.3% | -15.3% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.4% | -16.2% | +447.1% | +62.7% | -18.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.7% | -89.5% | +140.7% | -56.1% | -78.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.7% | -97.8% | -57.7% | -67.7% | -71.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.7% | -95.5% | -57.1% | -77.5% | +1737.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.9% | -52.9% | +34.0% | -24.0% | -39.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNTM and ARRY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNTM is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARRY currently trades 67.0% from its 52-week high vs STEM's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.25x | 3.66x | 3.08x | 2.32x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.80 | $32.23 | $6.35 | $12.23 | $54.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $5.93 | $0.65 | $4.92 | $25.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.8% | +27.0% | +65.2% | +67.0% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.3 | 51.2 | 53.3 | 56.4 | 52.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 155K | 3.7M | 6.0M | 5.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STEM as "Hold", NRGV as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 137.2% upside for STEM (target: $21) vs -33.6% for NRGV (target: $3).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.67 | $2.75 | $9.17 | $43.48 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 | 7 | 28 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.8% |
ENPH leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CNTM vs STEM vs NRGV vs ARRY vs ENPH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNTM or STEM or NRGV or ARRY or ENPH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is the stronger pick with 340. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 1% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (17. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNTM or STEM or NRGV or ARRY or ENPH?
On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNTM or STEM or NRGV or ARRY or ENPH?
Over the past 5 years, ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc.
(CNTM) delivered a total return of -46. 7%, compared to -97. 8% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1738% versus STEM's -95. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNTM or STEM or NRGV or ARRY or ENPH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc.
(CNTM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 66β — meaning STEM is approximately 1345% more volatile than CNTM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. (NRGV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 107% versus 9% for ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNTM or STEM or NRGV or ARRY or ENPH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.
(NRGV) is pulling ahead at 340. 9% versus 8. 1% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to 28. 6% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CNTM leads at 32. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNTM or STEM or NRGV or ARRY or ENPH?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -50. 9% for Energy Vault Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENPH leads at 11. 2% versus -38. 7% for STEM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNTM or STEM or NRGV or ARRY or ENPH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 17. 6x for Enphase Energy, Inc. — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for STEM: 137. 2% to $20. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNTM or STEM or NRGV or ARRY or ENPH?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CNTM or STEM or NRGV or ARRY or ENPH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ConnectM Technology Solutions, Inc.
(CNTM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25)). Stem, Inc. (STEM) carries a higher beta of 3. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNTM: -46. 7%, STEM: -95. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNTM and STEM and NRGV and ARRY and ENPH?
These companies operate in different sectors (CNTM (Technology) and STEM (Technology) and NRGV (Utilities) and ARRY (Energy) and ENPH (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CNTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NRGV is a small-cap high-growth stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.