Technology Distributors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CNXN vs NSIT vs CDW vs SNX vs AVT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Information Technology Services
Technology Distributors
Technology Distributors
CNXN vs NSIT vs CDW vs SNX vs AVT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors | Information Technology Services | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $1.68B | $2.54B | $13.39B | $19.30B | $6.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.89B | $8.27B | $22.90B | $62.51B | $24.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $87M | $180M | $1.08B | $828M | $214M |
| Gross Margin | 18.8% | 22.0% | 21.6% | 6.5% | 10.5% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | 4.8% | 7.3% | 2.4% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 7.5x | 9.9x | 14.3x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $996K | $1.59B | $6.33B | $4.61B | $2.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $193M | $358M | $619M | $2.44B | $192M |
CNXN vs NSIT vs CDW vs SNX vs AVT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) | 100 | 154.0 | +54.0% |
| Insight Enterprises… (NSIT) | 100 | 163.5 | +63.5% |
| CDW Corporation (CDW) | 100 | 94.5 | -5.5% |
| TD SYNNEX Corporati… (SNX) | 100 | 447.4 | +347.4% |
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 301.4 | +201.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CNXN vs NSIT vs CDW vs SNX vs AVT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CNXN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.81, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.90x
- Beta 0.81 vs SNX's 1.43, lower leverage
NSIT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 16.0x)
CDW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.91, yield 2.4%
- PEG 1.21 vs CNXN's 1.88
- 4.7% margin vs AVT's 0.9%
- 2.4% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SNX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 25.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.1%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs NSIT's 250.3%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6%
- +103.5% vs CDW's -40.4%
Among these 5 stocks, AVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs AVT's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.7% margin vs AVT's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs SNX's 1.43, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SNX's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.5% vs CDW's -40.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 15.4% vs 6.0% |
CNXN vs NSIT vs CDW vs SNX vs AVT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CNXN vs NSIT vs CDW vs SNX vs AVT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CDW leads in 3 of 6 categories
NSIT leads 1 • SNX leads 1 • CNXN leads 0 • AVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNX is the larger business by revenue, generating $62.5B annually — 21.6x CNXN's $2.9B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.7% (CDW) to 0.9% (AVT). On growth, AVT holds the edge at +33.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $8.3B | $22.9B | $62.5B | $25.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127M | $477M | $1.9B | $1.9B | $781M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $87M | $180M | $1.1B | $828M | $214M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $124M | $235M | $1.1B | $1.4B | $33M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +22.0% | +21.6% | +6.5% | +10.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +4.8% | +7.3% | +2.4% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +2.2% | +4.7% | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +2.8% | +4.7% | +2.2% | +0.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.0% | +1.2% | +9.2% | +9.7% | +33.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +3.4% | +7.7% | +32.8% | +12.9% |
Valuation Metrics
NSIT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, CDW trades at a 57% valuation discount to AVT's 29.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CDW offers better value at 1.58x vs CNXN's 2.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $2.5B | $13.4B | $19.3B | $6.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.5B | $3.8B | $19.1B | $21.5B | $9.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.38x | 17.24x | 12.97x | 24.03x | 29.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.98x | 7.55x | 9.91x | 14.27x | 16.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.25x | — | 1.58x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.72x | 7.83x | 9.79x | 11.69x | 12.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 0.31x | 0.60x | 0.31x | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.85x | 1.64x | 5.31x | 2.33x | 1.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.95x | 9.11x | 12.30x | 13.89x | 11.65x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDW delivers a 42.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $42 in annual profit, vs $4 for AVT. CNXN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CDW's 2.43x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NSIT scores 6/9 vs CDW's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +11.2% | +42.4% | +9.8% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +2.0% | +6.8% | +2.4% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.6% | +10.3% | +15.4% | +9.9% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.0% | +10.3% | +18.4% | +10.8% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.96x | 2.43x | 0.55x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$192M | $1.2B | $5.7B | $2.2B | $2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $193M | $358M | $619M | $2.4B | $192M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $996,000 | $1.6B | $6.3B | $4.6B | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.97x | 14.52x | 3.96x | 2.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNX five years ago would be worth $20,464 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,778 for CDW. Over the past 12 months, SNX leads with a +103.5% total return vs CDW's -40.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNX at 40.6% vs NSIT's -12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.5% | -0.2% | -20.8% | +56.4% | +67.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.5% | -38.5% | -40.4% | +103.5% | +64.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.1% | -32.5% | -32.5% | +177.9% | +108.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +49.6% | -15.5% | -32.2% | +104.6% | +99.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.6% | +250.3% | +197.4% | +521.4% | +135.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.5% | -12.3% | -12.3% | +40.6% | +27.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CNXN and SNX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNXN is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNX's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNX currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs CDW's 54.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.38x | 0.91x | 1.43x | 1.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.17 | $148.58 | $192.30 | $240.47 | $84.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $54.97 | $63.62 | $104.43 | $115.85 | $44.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.6% | +56.4% | +54.5% | +99.4% | +96.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.3 | 42.3 | 29.4 | 77.3 | 66.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 458K | 1.6M | 738K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
CDW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CNXN as "Buy", NSIT as "Buy", CDW as "Buy", SNX as "Buy", AVT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 41.4% upside for CDW (target: $148) vs -18.4% for SNX (target: $195). For income investors, CDW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.37% vs SNX's 0.74%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $87.50 | $148.20 | $195.00 | $79.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 7 | 18 | 24 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — | +2.4% | +0.7% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 12 | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.60 | — | $2.49 | $1.78 | $1.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.5% | +5.9% | +4.9% | +3.2% | +4.5% |
CDW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NSIT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CNXN vs NSIT vs CDW vs SNX vs AVT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CNXN or NSIT or CDW or SNX or AVT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger pick with 6.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). CDW Corporation (CDW) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CNXN or NSIT or CDW or SNX or AVT?
On trailing P/E, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the cheapest at 13.
0x versus Avnet, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, Insight Enterprises, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CDW Corporation wins at 1. 21x versus PC Connection, Inc. 's 1. 88x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CNXN or NSIT or CDW or SNX or AVT?
Over the past 5 years, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) delivered a total return of +104.
6%, compared to -32. 2% for CDW Corporation (CDW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +521. 4% versus AVT's +135. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CNXN or NSIT or CDW or SNX or AVT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus TD SYNNEX Corporation's 1. 43β — meaning SNX is approximately 77% more volatile than CNXN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PC Connection, Inc. (CNXN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for CDW Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CNXN or NSIT or CDW or SNX or AVT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is pulling ahead at 6.
9% versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TD SYNNEX Corporation grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNX leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CNXN or NSIT or CDW or SNX or AVT?
CDW Corporation (CDW) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
8% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CDW leads at 7. 4% versus 2. 3% for SNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDW leads at 21. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CNXN or NSIT or CDW or SNX or AVT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CDW Corporation (CDW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 21x versus PC Connection, Inc. 's 1. 88x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Insight Enterprises, Inc. (NSIT) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 17. 0x for PC Connection, Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CDW: 41. 4% to $148. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — CNXN or NSIT or CDW or SNX or AVT?
In this comparison, CDW (2.
4% yield), AVT (1. 6% yield), CNXN (0. 9% yield), SNX (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. NSIT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CNXN or NSIT or CDW or SNX or AVT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PC Connection, Inc.
(CNXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 0. 9% yield, +204. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNXN: +204. 6%, NSIT: +250. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CNXN and NSIT and CDW and SNX and AVT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CNXN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NSIT is a small-cap deep-value stock; CDW is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SNX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CNXN, CDW, SNX, AVT pay a dividend while NSIT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.