Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $74M | $898M | $203M | $10.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $372M | $90M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $89M | $14M | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 64.0% | 54.7% | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | 26.3% | 27.5% | 7.0% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 9.5x | 11.8x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $826M | $52M | $4.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $473M | $119M | $1.43B |
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central Plains Banc… (CPBI) | 100 | 194.6 | +94.6% |
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 157.9 | +57.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 239.0 | +139.0% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 203.7 | +103.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPBI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.14 vs BOKF's 1.03
MBWM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 178.2% 10Y total return vs CPBI's 92.9%
- PEG 0.63 vs BOKF's 4.38
- NIM 2.9% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.63 vs 2.32
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
- +45.6% vs CPBI's +18.3%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.63 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CPBI's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs BOKF's 1.03 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs BOKF's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs CPBI's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs CPBI's 0.7% |
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MBWM leads in 3 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • CPBI leads 1 • BOKF leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MBWM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 177.9x CPBI's $19M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $372M | $90M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $107M | $9M | $797M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $89M | $14M | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $11M | $11M | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +64.0% | +54.7% | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +27.5% | +7.0% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +23.9% | +16.0% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.2% | +3.0% | +11.5% | +42.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | +14.8% | +63.0% | +1.8% |
Valuation Metrics
MBWM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 48% valuation discount to CPBI's 18.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.63x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74M | $898M | $203M | $10.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45M | $1.3B | $136M | $13.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.28x | 9.53x | 14.44x | 16.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.54x | 11.78x | 13.05x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.63x | 2.85x | 5.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.07x | 11.75x | 15.28x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.91x | 2.42x | 2.25x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.17x | 1.09x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 80.15x | 19.55x | 7.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MBWM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MBWM delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $4 for CPBI. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.4% | +13.5% | +7.8% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.4% | +0.8% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +5.5% | +2.0% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.0% | +8.0% | +0.6% | +5.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.14x | 0.28x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | $353M | -$67M | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $473M | $119M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $826M | $52M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.79x | 0.16x | 0.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CPBI five years ago would be worth $19,286 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,944 for BOKF. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs CPBI's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs BOKF's 21.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.1% | +10.1% | +21.5% | +13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +23.6% | +45.6% | +44.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.9% | +127.3% | +160.0% | +79.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.9% | +78.4% | +71.2% | +59.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.9% | +178.2% | +157.0% | +168.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.5% | +31.5% | +37.5% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
CPBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CPBI currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 0.87x | 0.46x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.89 | $55.77 | $22.62 | $139.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.52 | $42.17 | $12.83 | $91.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +93.3% | +93.2% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 53.1 | 63.7 | 58.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 112K | 40K | 317K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MBWM and BOKF each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MBWM as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 9.6% upside for MBWM (target: $57) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, MBWM offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.00 | — | $131.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 2 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +1.8% | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.47 | $0.37 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +0.9% |
MBWM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF?
On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Central Plains Bancshares, Inc. Common Stock at 18. 3x. On forward P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mercantile Bank Corporation wins at 0. 63x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF?
Over the past 5 years, Central Plains Bancshares, Inc.
Common Stock (CPBI) delivered a total return of +92. 9%, compared to +59. 4% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MBWM returned +178. 2% versus CPBI's +92. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Central Plains Bancshares, Inc.
Common Stock (CPBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 662% more volatile than CPBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.
4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mercantile Bank Corporation grew EPS 10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -56. 2% for Central Plains Bancshares, Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF?
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
9% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBWM leads at 27. 5% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPBI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 63x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for BOK Financial Corporation — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MBWM: 9. 6% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF?
In this comparison, MBWM (2.
8% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield), BOKF (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CPBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, BOKF: +168. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPBI and MBWM and CZWI and BOKF?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CPBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock. MBWM, CZWI, BOKF pay a dividend while CPBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.