Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CRESY vs VNET vs GDS vs AGRO vs DLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Agricultural Farm Products
REIT - Office
CRESY vs VNET vs GDS vs AGRO vs DLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Agricultural Farm Products | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $727M | $2.60B | $8.01B | $6.89B | $66.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.05T | $9.50B | $11.39B | $1.43B | $6.19B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $234.51B | $-568M | $956M | $-8M | $1.31B |
| Gross Margin | 42.0% | 22.7% | 22.1% | 23.4% | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | 62.1% | 9.0% | 13.2% | 4.4% | 13.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9999.0x | 34.7x | 15.2x | 6.9x | 96.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.46T | $18.45B | $47.55B | $1.95B | $24.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $250.85B | $2.04B | $14.32B | $383M | $3.45B |
CRESY vs VNET vs GDS vs AGRO vs DLR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cresud Sociedad Anó… (CRESY) | 100 | 364.6 | +264.6% |
| VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) | 100 | 61.4 | -38.6% |
| GDS Holdings Limited (GDS) | 100 | 76.5 | -23.5% |
| Adecoagro S.A. (AGRO) | 100 | 310.2 | +210.2% |
| Digital Realty Trus… (DLR) | 100 | 135.7 | +35.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRESY vs VNET vs GDS vs AGRO vs DLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRESY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.19, yield 8.5%
- 64.4% 10Y total return vs GDS's 319.0%
- 28.5% revenue growth vs AGRO's -9.5%
- 22.3% margin vs VNET's -6.0%
VNET is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 11.4%, EPS growth 103.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.1%
GDS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +66.6% vs CRESY's +10.5%
AGRO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 96.3x)
DLR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 97.3%, current ratio 4.50x
- Beta 0.77, yield 2.5%, current ratio 4.50x
- Beta 0.77 vs VNET's 2.70, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.5% revenue growth vs AGRO's -9.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 96.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs VNET's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs VNET's 2.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.5% yield, vs AGRO's 0.5%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.6% vs CRESY's +10.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.3% ROA vs VNET's -1.5%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.4% |
CRESY vs VNET vs GDS vs AGRO vs DLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CRESY vs VNET vs GDS vs AGRO vs DLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRESY leads in 3 of 6 categories
VNET leads 0 • GDS leads 0 • AGRO leads 0 • DLR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRESY is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.05T annually — 737.2x AGRO's $1.4B. CRESY is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VNET's -6.0%. On growth, CRESY holds the edge at +50.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.05T | $9.5B | $11.4B | $1.4B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $670.2B | $2.8B | $4.9B | $335M | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $234.5B | -$568M | $956M | -$8M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $116.8B | -$3.9B | -$1.3B | $37M | $233M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +42.0% | +22.7% | +22.1% | +23.4% | +40.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +62.1% | +9.0% | +13.2% | +4.4% | +13.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.3% | -6.0% | +8.4% | -0.5% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.1% | -40.7% | -11.0% | +2.6% | +3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.4% | +23.8% | +7.1% | +11.1% | +19.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.6% | -2.1% | -158.3% | -162.5% | -51.0% |
Valuation Metrics
CRESY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 54.4x trailing earnings, DLR trades at a 99% valuation discount to CRESY's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRESY's 9.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AGRO's 72.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $727M | $2.6B | $8.0B | $6.9B | $66.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $5.0B | $12.9B | $8.5B | $87.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9999.00x | 92.39x | 70.01x | -815.24x | 54.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.74x | 15.22x | 6.85x | 96.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.87x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.60x | 15.40x | 18.16x | 72.46x | 34.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 2.14x | 4.90x | 5.01x | 10.95x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.47x | 2.56x | 2.20x | 3.82x | 2.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.55x | — | — | 334.52x | 27.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CRESY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CRESY delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-8 for VNET. CRESY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNET's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNET scores 7/9 vs AGRO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.1% | -7.6% | +3.7% | -0.5% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.3% | -1.5% | +1.2% | -0.2% | +2.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +2.4% | +1.8% | -2.1% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.4% | +3.2% | +2.1% | -2.3% | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 2.67x | 1.71x | 1.09x | 0.97x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.21T | $16.4B | $33.2B | $1.6B | $20.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $250.9B | $2.0B | $14.3B | $383M | $3.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.46T | $18.4B | $47.6B | $1.9B | $24.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.48x | 1.75x | 1.97x | 0.68x | 3.87x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — VNET and GDS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CRESY five years ago would be worth $23,277 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,486 for VNET. Over the past 12 months, GDS leads with a +66.6% total return vs CRESY's +10.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNET at 44.2% vs AGRO's 19.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.4% | -1.6% | +13.8% | +73.8% | +26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +10.5% | +42.2% | +66.6% | +58.7% | +19.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +140.9% | +199.7% | +195.9% | +68.9% | +115.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +132.8% | -65.1% | -41.4% | +50.1% | +44.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +64.4% | -36.8% | +319.0% | +39.9% | +156.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +34.1% | +44.2% | +43.6% | +19.1% | +29.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AGRO and DLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGRO is the less volatile stock with a -0.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNET's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DLR currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs VNET's 61.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 2.70x | 2.14x | -0.08x | 0.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.21 | $14.48 | $48.61 | $15.89 | $208.09 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.32 | $5.15 | $22.53 | $6.89 | $146.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.0% | +61.9% | +89.7% | +84.1% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 53.0 | 61.6 | 51.7 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 272K | 5.7M | 1.7M | 1.8M | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CRESY and AGRO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRESY as "Buy", VNET as "Buy", GDS as "Buy", AGRO as "Hold", DLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 162.8% upside for VNET (target: $24) vs -36.4% for AGRO (target: $9). For income investors, CRESY offers the higher dividend yield at 8.47% vs AGRO's 0.51%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.68 | $23.55 | $62.17 | $8.50 | $209.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.5% | — | — | +0.5% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 3 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1320.71 | — | — | $0.07 | $4.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
CRESY leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 3 categories are tied.
CRESY vs VNET vs GDS vs AGRO vs DLR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRESY or VNET or GDS or AGRO or DLR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) is the stronger pick with 28.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO). Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (DLR) offers the better valuation at 54. 4x trailing P/E (96. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRESY or VNET or GDS or AGRO or DLR?
On trailing P/E, Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
(DLR) is the cheapest at 54. 4x versus Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Adecoagro S. A. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRESY or VNET or GDS or AGRO or DLR?
Over the past 5 years, Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) delivered a total return of +132.
8%, compared to -65. 1% for VNET Group, Inc. (VNET). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GDS returned +319. 0% versus VNET's -36. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRESY or VNET or GDS or AGRO or DLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 08β versus VNET Group, Inc. 's 2. 70β — meaning VNET is approximately -3469% more volatile than AGRO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 3% for VNET Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRESY or VNET or GDS or AGRO or DLR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cresud Sociedad Anónima, Comercial, Inmobiliaria, Financiera y Agropecuaria (CRESY) is pulling ahead at 28.
5% versus -9. 5% for Adecoagro S. A. (AGRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GDS Holdings Limited grew EPS 193. 0% year-over-year, compared to -109. 1% for Adecoagro S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VNET leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRESY or VNET or GDS or AGRO or DLR?
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
(DLR) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 4% net margin versus -0. 6% for Adecoagro S. A. — meaning it keeps 21. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRESY leads at 24. 2% versus -5. 7% for AGRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DLR leads at 55. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRESY or VNET or GDS or AGRO or DLR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 96. 3x for Digital Realty Trust, Inc. — 89. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNET: 162. 8% to $23. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRESY or VNET or GDS or AGRO or DLR?
In this comparison, CRESY (8.
5% yield), DLR (2. 5% yield), AGRO (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. VNET, GDS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CRESY or VNET or GDS or AGRO or DLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Adecoagro S.
A. (AGRO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 08), 0. 5% yield). VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) carries a higher beta of 2. 70 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGRO: +39. 9%, VNET: -36. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRESY and VNET and GDS and AGRO and DLR?
These companies operate in different sectors (CRESY (Industrials) and VNET (Technology) and GDS (Technology) and AGRO (Consumer Defensive) and DLR (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CRESY is a small-cap high-growth stock; VNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GDS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. CRESY, AGRO, DLR pay a dividend while VNET, GDS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.