Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CREX vs DLHC vs OESX vs SGBX vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Construction
CREX vs DLHC vs OESX vs SGBX vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Specialty Business Services | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Construction |
| Market Cap | $40M | $84M | $35M | $33K | $8.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $293M | $81M | $3M | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $-4M | $-5M | $-19M | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 14.4% | 29.9% | -87.3% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | -22.6% | 2.5% | -4.3% | -375.8% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 61.7x | — | — | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $145M | $10M | $7M | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $125K | $6M | $376K | $182M |
CREX vs DLHC vs OESX vs SGBX vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Realities,… (CREX) | 100 | 50.0 | -50.0% |
| DLH Holdings Corp. (DLHC) | 100 | 78.5 | -21.5% |
| Orion Energy System… (OESX) | 100 | 22.1 | -77.9% |
| Safe & Green Holdin… (SGBX) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 371.9 | +271.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREX vs DLHC vs OESX vs SGBX vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 2.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 40.2%
- 12.6% revenue growth vs SGBX's -69.9%
- +123.7% vs SGBX's -97.3%
DLHC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87
- Beta 0.87, current ratio 1.00x
OESX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 86.9%, current ratio 1.32x
SGBX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability and dividends.
- Beta 0.15 vs BLDR's 1.66
- 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
BLDR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs DLHC's 25.8%
- Better valuation composite
- 2.0% margin vs SGBX's -5.7%
- 2.6% ROA vs SGBX's -35.6%, ROIC 6.4% vs -625.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.6% revenue growth vs SGBX's -69.9% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.0% margin vs SGBX's -5.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs BLDR's 1.66 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.7% vs SGBX's -97.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs SGBX's -35.6%, ROIC 6.4% vs -625.7% |
CREX vs DLHC vs OESX vs SGBX vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CREX vs DLHC vs OESX vs SGBX vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BLDR leads in 2 of 6 categories
OESX leads 1 • DLHC leads 1 • CREX leads 1 • SGBX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OESX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BLDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.8B annually — 4381.0x SGBX's $3M. BLDR is the more profitable business, keeping 2.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SGBX's -5.7%. On growth, OESX holds the edge at +7.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $293M | $81M | $3M | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $25M | -$1M | -$12M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | -$4M | -$5M | -$19M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $19M | $348M | -$5M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.1% | +14.4% | +29.9% | -87.3% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.6% | +2.5% | -4.3% | -3.8% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.5% | -1.5% | -5.6% | -5.7% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +6.5% | +4.3% | -155.0% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.0% | -33.6% | +7.7% | -40.0% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.2% | -4.0% | +109.6% | +88.9% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
DLHC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, BLDR trades at a 68% valuation discount to DLHC's 61.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DLHC's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CREX's 10.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $40M | $84M | $35M | $32,963 | $8.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53M | $229M | $39M | $7M | $14.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.12x | 61.68x | -2.74x | -0.00x | 19.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 18.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.50x | 6.74x | — | — | 10.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 0.24x | 0.44x | 0.01x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.55x | 0.74x | 2.73x | — | 1.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 68.55x | 3.67x | 71.04x | — | 10.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BLDR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BLDR delivers a 6.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-77 for SGBX. CREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.55x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BLDR's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DLHC scores 5/9 vs SGBX's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.8% | -4.0% | -0.0% | -77.2% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.8% | -1.6% | -0.0% | -35.6% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +4.7% | -34.8% | -625.7% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +6.6% | -34.9% | — | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 1.28x | 0.87x | — | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $145M | $4M | $7M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $125,000 | $6M | $375,873 | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $145M | $10M | $7M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.59x | 0.46x | -3.29x | -13.81x | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CREX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BLDR five years ago would be worth $14,799 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5 for SGBX. Over the past 12 months, CREX leads with a +123.7% total return vs SGBX's -97.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CREX at 12.7% vs SGBX's -87.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.5% | +4.1% | -33.8% | -52.9% | -26.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +123.7% | +42.4% | +38.4% | -97.3% | -30.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +43.2% | -43.3% | -34.6% | -99.8% | -31.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.0% | -42.5% | -82.3% | -99.9% | +48.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.0% | +25.8% | -27.9% | -100.0% | +596.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.7% | -17.2% | -13.2% | -87.5% | -12.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CREX and SGBX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SGBX is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLDR's 1.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CREX currently trades 86.9% from its 52-week high vs SGBX's 1.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.87x | 1.03x | 0.15x | 1.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.35 | $8.10 | $18.64 | $96.00 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.62 | $3.98 | $5.50 | $0.79 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +71.7% | +53.0% | +1.0% | +51.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 45.1 | 45.7 | 35.2 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 8K | 39K | 652K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
BLDR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
SGBX is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | $106.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +100.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $13.85 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | +4.8% |
BLDR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). OESX leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CREX vs DLHC vs OESX vs SGBX vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREX or DLHC or OESX or SGBX or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Creative Realities, Inc.
(CREX) is the stronger pick with 12. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CREX or DLHC or OESX or SGBX or BLDR?
On trailing P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is the cheapest at 19. 9x versus DLH Holdings Corp. at 61. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CREX or DLHC or OESX or SGBX or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) delivered a total return of +48. 0%, compared to -99. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLDR returned +596. 0% versus SGBX's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CREX or DLHC or OESX or SGBX or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
(SGBX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Builders FirstSource, Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning BLDR is approximately 1040% more volatile than SGBX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Creative Realities, Inc. (CREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 130% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CREX or DLHC or OESX or SGBX or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Creative Realities, Inc.
(CREX) is pulling ahead at 12. 6% versus -69. 9% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. (SGBX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe & Green Holdings Corp. grew EPS 69. 1% year-over-year, compared to -81. 5% for DLH Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CREX leads at 40. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CREX or DLHC or OESX or SGBX or BLDR?
Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -341. 2% for Safe & Green Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BLDR leads at 5. 2% versus -195. 0% for SGBX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CREX leads at 47. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — CREX or DLHC or OESX or SGBX or BLDR?
In this comparison, SGBX (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. CREX, DLHC, OESX, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is CREX or DLHC or OESX or SGBX or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Safe & Green Holdings Corp.
(SGBX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 100. 0% yield). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) carries a higher beta of 1. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SGBX: -100. 0%, BLDR: +596. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CREX and DLHC and OESX and SGBX and BLDR?
These companies operate in different sectors (CREX (Technology) and DLHC (Industrials) and OESX (Industrials) and SGBX (Industrials) and BLDR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DLHC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OESX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SGBX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SGBX pays a dividend while CREX, DLHC, OESX, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.