Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CTLP vs NXST vs PAX vs GTN vs SBGI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Asset Management
Broadcasting
Entertainment
CTLP vs NXST vs PAX vs GTN vs SBGI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Entertainment | Asset Management | Broadcasting | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $826M | $5.89B | $1.92B | $412M | $991M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $318M | $5.11B | $384M | $3.08B | $3.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $55M | $165M | $86M | $-76M | $-112M |
| Gross Margin | 39.0% | 32.3% | 96.2% | 115.0% | 44.8% |
| Operating Margin | 6.0% | 17.8% | 34.2% | 12.4% | 5.5% |
| Forward P/E | 27.3x | 7.9x | 8.4x | 1.8x | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $49M | $6.86B | $199M | $5.81B | $4.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $51M | $280M | $54M | $368M | $866M |
CTLP vs NXST vs PAX vs GTN vs SBGI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) | 100 | 112.9 | +12.9% |
| Nexstar Media Group… (NXST) | 100 | 183.1 | +83.1% |
| Patria Investments … (PAX) | 100 | 67.5 | -32.5% |
| Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) | 100 | 33.1 | -66.9% |
| Sinclair, Inc. (SBGI) | 100 | 49.3 | -50.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTLP vs NXST vs PAX vs GTN vs SBGI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTLP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 12.6%, EPS growth 473.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 19.2%, current ratio 1.86x
- 12.6% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1%
- Beta 0.38 vs GTN's 1.54, lower leverage
NXST is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 331.4% 10Y total return vs CTLP's 141.9%
PAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- 22.3% margin vs SBGI's -3.5%
GTN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.54, yield 7.7%
- Lower P/E (1.8x vs 12.3x)
- 7.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NXST's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SBGI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.75, yield 7.0%, current ratio 2.42x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.6% revenue growth vs GTN's -15.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.8x vs 12.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.3% margin vs SBGI's -3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs GTN's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs NXST's 2.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.3% vs SBGI's -3.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.4% ROA vs SBGI's -2.0%, ROIC 7.9% vs 2.8% |
CTLP vs NXST vs PAX vs GTN vs SBGI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CTLP vs NXST vs PAX vs GTN vs SBGI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTLP leads in 3 of 6 categories
GTN leads 2 • PAX leads 1 • NXST leads 0 • SBGI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NXST is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 16.1x CTLP's $318M. PAX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBGI's -3.5%. On growth, NXST holds the edge at +13.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $318M | $5.1B | $384M | $3.1B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $39M | $2.0B | $174M | $932M | $475M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $55M | $165M | $86M | -$76M | -$112M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | $708M | $268M | -$74M | $115M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.0% | +32.3% | +96.2% | +115.0% | +44.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +17.8% | +34.2% | +12.4% | +5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +3.2% | +22.3% | -2.5% | -3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +13.8% | +67.3% | -2.4% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +13.1% | — | -1.8% | -16.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -101.5% | +51.0% | -40.5% | +98.5% | -40.8% |
Valuation Metrics
GTN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.0x trailing earnings, CTLP trades at a 80% valuation discount to NXST's 64.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NXST's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CTLP's 20.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $826M | $5.9B | $1.9B | $412M | $991M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $823M | $12.5B | $2.1B | $5.9B | $4.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.02x | 64.75x | 22.30x | -5.03x | -8.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.32x | 7.88x | 8.42x | 1.81x | 12.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 7.92x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.51x | 7.57x | 15.74x | 9.31x | 9.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.73x | 1.19x | 5.01x | 0.13x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 2.89x | 3.00x | 0.15x | 2.65x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 247.43x | 7.93x | 7.44x | 2.27x | 8.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTLP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTLP delivers a 21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-34 for SBGI. CTLP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SBGI's 12.21x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTLP scores 6/9 vs SBGI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +21.8% | +10.0% | +14.4% | -2.9% | -34.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.4% | +1.9% | +6.3% | -0.7% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +7.4% | +12.5% | +3.5% | +2.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.4% | +8.2% | +13.9% | +3.9% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 3.33x | 0.31x | 2.07x | 12.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $6.6B | $145M | $5.4B | $3.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51M | $280M | $54M | $368M | $866M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49M | $6.9B | $199M | $5.8B | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.98x | 1.81x | 7.45x | 1.12x | 0.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTLP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NXST five years ago would be worth $15,010 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,729 for GTN. Over the past 12 months, CTLP leads with a +36.3% total return vs SBGI's -3.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTLP at 18.6% vs GTN's -9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.9% | -6.1% | -23.4% | -6.0% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.3% | +29.4% | +14.9% | +27.7% | -3.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.9% | +29.1% | -1.4% | -26.1% | +5.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.1% | +50.1% | +5.4% | -72.7% | -43.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.9% | +331.4% | -19.3% | -50.5% | -28.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.6% | +8.9% | -0.5% | -9.6% | +1.7% |
Risk & Volatility
CTLP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTLP is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GTN's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CTLP currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs PAX's 67.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.36x | 0.68x | 1.09x | 1.54x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.21 | $254.30 | $17.80 | $6.43 | $17.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.57 | $154.64 | $10.86 | $3.50 | $11.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.9% | +76.4% | +67.6% | +68.9% | +79.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.8 | 43.2 | 54.1 | 52.8 | 46.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 402K | 885K | 1.3M | 491K |
Analyst Outlook
GTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTLP as "Buy", NXST as "Buy", PAX as "Buy", GTN as "Buy", SBGI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 80.6% upside for GTN (target: $8) vs -1.8% for CTLP (target: $11). For income investors, GTN offers the higher dividend yield at 7.68% vs NXST's 2.83%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $250.00 | $18.00 | $8.00 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 24 | 5 | 9 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +5.0% | +7.7% | +7.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $5.50 | $0.60 | $0.34 | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.0% | +2.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CTLP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GTN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
CTLP vs NXST vs PAX vs GTN vs SBGI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTLP or NXST or PAX or GTN or SBGI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is the stronger pick with 12. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (27. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTLP or NXST or PAX or GTN or SBGI?
On trailing P/E, Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is the cheapest at 13. 0x versus Nexstar Media Group, Inc. at 64. 8x. On forward P/E, Gray Media, Inc. is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTLP or NXST or PAX or GTN or SBGI?
Over the past 5 years, Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
(NXST) delivered a total return of +50. 1%, compared to -72. 7% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXST returned +347. 4% versus GTN's -50. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTLP or NXST or PAX or GTN or SBGI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 36β versus Gray Media, Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning GTN is approximately 326% more volatile than CTLP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cantaloupe, Inc. (CTLP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 12% for Sinclair, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTLP or NXST or PAX or GTN or SBGI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cantaloupe, Inc.
(CTLP) is pulling ahead at 12. 6% versus -15. 1% for Gray Media, Inc. (GTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cantaloupe, Inc. grew EPS 473. 3% year-over-year, compared to -134. 3% for Sinclair, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTLP leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTLP or NXST or PAX or GTN or SBGI?
Patria Investments Limited (PAX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
3% net margin versus -3. 5% for Sinclair, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PAX leads at 34. 2% versus 4. 9% for SBGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTN leads at 96. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTLP or NXST or PAX or GTN or SBGI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Gray Media, Inc.
(GTN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 3x for Cantaloupe, Inc. — 25. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GTN: 80. 6% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTLP or NXST or PAX or GTN or SBGI?
In this comparison, GTN (7.
7% yield), SBGI (7. 0% yield), PAX (5. 0% yield), NXST (2. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CTLP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CTLP or NXST or PAX or GTN or SBGI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
(NXST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 2. 8% yield, +347. 4% 10Y return). Gray Media, Inc. (GTN) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NXST: +347. 4%, GTN: -50. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTLP and NXST and PAX and GTN and SBGI?
These companies operate in different sectors (CTLP (Technology) and NXST (Communication Services) and PAX (Financial Services) and GTN (Communication Services) and SBGI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CTLP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NXST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PAX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GTN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SBGI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. NXST, PAX, GTN, SBGI pay a dividend while CTLP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 19%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 68%
- Dividend Yield > 3.0%
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 26%
- Dividend Yield > 2.8%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.