Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CTRN vs ROST vs TJX vs BURL vs FIVE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Discount Stores
CTRN vs ROST vs TJX vs BURL vs FIVE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $403M | $73.81B | $171.46B | $19.40B | $12.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $801M | $22.75B | $60.37B | $11.56B | $4.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-16M | $2.15B | $5.49B | $610M | $359M |
| Gross Margin | 37.8% | 27.9% | 31.1% | 41.9% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | 11.9% | 12.0% | 8.9% | 9.6% |
| Forward P/E | 44.1x | 34.4x | 33.0x | 31.3x | 34.7x |
| Total Debt | $220M | $5.21B | $22.38B | $3.99B | $2.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $4.59B | $6.23B | $1.23B | $724M |
CTRN vs ROST vs TJX vs BURL vs FIVE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) | 100 | 290.5 | +190.5% |
| Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
| The TJX Companies, … (TJX) | 100 | 292.8 | +192.8% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 146.2 | +46.2% |
| Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) | 100 | 211.4 | +111.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTRN vs ROST vs TJX vs BURL vs FIVE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTRN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ROST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 80.5%, current ratio 1.58x
- 9.4% margin vs CTRN's -2.0%
TJX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.39, yield 1.1%
- PEG 0.25 vs FIVE's 1.44
- Beta 0.39, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.14x
- Lower P/E (33.0x vs 34.4x), PEG 0.25 vs 0.37
Among these 5 stocks, BURL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FIVE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 22.9%, EPS growth 40.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.7%
- 448.6% 10Y total return vs TJX's 322.5%
- 22.9% revenue growth vs CTRN's 0.7%
- +169.2% vs TJX's +21.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.9% revenue growth vs CTRN's 0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.0x vs 34.4x), PEG 0.25 vs 0.37 | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs CTRN's -2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs FIVE's 2.02 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ROST's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +169.2% vs TJX's +21.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.4% ROA vs CTRN's -3.6%, ROIC 25.5% vs -10.1% |
CTRN vs ROST vs TJX vs BURL vs FIVE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTRN vs ROST vs TJX vs BURL vs FIVE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TJX leads in 2 of 6 categories
CTRN leads 1 • ROST leads 0 • BURL leads 0 • FIVE leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ROST and TJX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TJX is the larger business by revenue, generating $60.4B annually — 75.4x CTRN's $801M. ROST is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTRN's -2.0%. On growth, FIVE holds the edge at +24.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $801M | $22.8B | $60.4B | $11.6B | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $3.6B | $8.2B | $1.5B | $650M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$16M | $2.1B | $5.5B | $610M | $359M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $2.2B | $4.9B | $232M | $412M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.8% | +27.9% | +31.1% | +41.9% | +35.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +11.9% | +12.0% | +8.9% | +9.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +9.4% | +9.1% | +5.3% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +9.7% | +8.0% | +2.0% | +8.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | +12.2% | +8.5% | +11.5% | +24.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | +11.7% | +28.5% | +20.4% | +26.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CTRN leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 31.7x trailing earnings, TJX trades at a 8% valuation discount to FIVE's 34.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TJX offers better value at 0.24x vs FIVE's 1.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $403M | $73.8B | $171.5B | $19.4B | $12.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $563M | $74.4B | $187.6B | $22.2B | $13.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.09x | 33.96x | 31.65x | 32.24x | 34.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.08x | 34.41x | 32.98x | 31.34x | 34.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.36x | 0.24x | — | 1.42x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.77x | 22.27x | 17.49x | 20.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 3.24x | 2.84x | 1.68x | 2.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.47x | 11.20x | 17.05x | 5.05x | 5.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 33.44x | 35.31x | 113.08x | 29.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TJX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TJX delivers a 53.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $54 in annual profit, vs $-15 for CTRN. ROST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TJX's 2.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ROST scores 7/9 vs CTRN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.8% | +36.3% | +53.9% | +29.7% | +18.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.6% | +14.4% | +15.4% | +6.5% | +7.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -10.1% | +30.0% | +25.5% | +10.3% | +9.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -12.4% | +25.8% | +33.3% | +12.0% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.95x | 0.80x | 2.20x | 1.03x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $159M | $618M | $16.2B | $2.8B | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $4.6B | $6.2B | $1.2B | $724M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $5.2B | $22.4B | $4.0B | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.65x | 82.30x | 133.22x | 11.36x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CTRN and FIVE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TJX five years ago would be worth $21,851 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,454 for CTRN. Over the past 12 months, FIVE leads with a +169.2% total return vs TJX's +21.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTRN at 44.1% vs FIVE's 4.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.6% | +23.1% | +0.4% | +2.8% | +14.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +105.1% | +58.1% | +21.4% | +25.1% | +169.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +199.5% | +118.5% | +102.9% | +68.1% | +12.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.5% | +74.1% | +118.5% | -7.4% | +12.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +176.4% | +304.0% | +322.5% | +440.2% | +448.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +44.1% | +29.8% | +26.6% | +18.9% | +4.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ROST and TJX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TJX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIVE's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ROST currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs CTRN's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 0.89x | 0.39x | 1.30x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $56.51 | $231.16 | $165.82 | $351.85 | $251.63 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.68 | $124.49 | $119.84 | $218.52 | $81.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +97.1% | +93.2% | +87.1% | +87.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 62.1 | 43.2 | 44.5 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 2.4M | 4.0M | 721K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
TJX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTRN as "Buy", ROST as "Buy", TJX as "Buy", BURL as "Buy", FIVE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 44.2% upside for CTRN (target: $68) vs -4.8% for ROST (target: $214). For income investors, TJX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.06% vs ROST's 0.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $68.00 | $213.80 | $172.00 | $331.88 | $219.47 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 47 | 53 | 35 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +1.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.64 | $1.64 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | +1.5% | +1.5% | +1.4% | 0.0% |
TJX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). CTRN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CTRN vs ROST vs TJX vs BURL vs FIVE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTRN or ROST or TJX or BURL or FIVE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Five Below, Inc.
(FIVE) is the stronger pick with 22. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 7% for Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN). The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) offers the better valuation at 31. 7x trailing P/E (33. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTRN or ROST or TJX or BURL or FIVE?
On trailing P/E, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the cheapest at 31. 7x versus Five Below, Inc. at 34. 2x. On forward P/E, Burlington Stores, Inc. is actually cheaper at 31. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The TJX Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus Five Below, Inc. 's 1. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTRN or ROST or TJX or BURL or FIVE?
Over the past 5 years, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) delivered a total return of +118. 5%, compared to -55. 5% for Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FIVE returned +448. 6% versus CTRN's +176. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTRN or ROST or TJX or BURL or FIVE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus Five Below, Inc. 's 2. 02β — meaning FIVE is approximately 412% more volatile than TJX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ross Stores, Inc. (ROST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 2% for The TJX Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTRN or ROST or TJX or BURL or FIVE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Five Below, Inc.
(FIVE) is pulling ahead at 22. 9% versus 0. 7% for Citi Trends, Inc. (CTRN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five Below, Inc. grew EPS 40. 4% year-over-year, compared to -255. 5% for Citi Trends, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTRN or ROST or TJX or BURL or FIVE?
Ross Stores, Inc.
(ROST) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -5. 7% for Citi Trends, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ROST leads at 11. 9% versus -5. 2% for CTRN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BURL leads at 40. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTRN or ROST or TJX or BURL or FIVE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The TJX Companies, Inc. (TJX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Five Below, Inc. 's 1. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) trades at 31. 3x forward P/E versus 44. 1x for Citi Trends, Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTRN: 44. 2% to $68. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTRN or ROST or TJX or BURL or FIVE?
In this comparison, TJX (1.
1% yield), ROST (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CTRN, BURL, FIVE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CTRN or ROST or TJX or BURL or FIVE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The TJX Companies, Inc.
(TJX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 1% yield, +322. 5% 10Y return). Five Below, Inc. (FIVE) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TJX: +322. 5%, FIVE: +448. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTRN and ROST and TJX and BURL and FIVE?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ROST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TJX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BURL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FIVE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ROST, TJX pay a dividend while CTRN, BURL, FIVE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.