Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CVBF vs BOKF vs BANR vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CVBF vs BOKF vs BANR vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.78B | $10.28B | $2.22B | $4.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $643M | $3.36B | $819M | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $209M | $537M | $195M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 79.9% | 57.1% | 79.0% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | 19.8% | 29.5% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.1x | 12.9x | 10.5x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $991M | $4.45B | $373M | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $108M | $1.43B | $183M | $763M |
CVBF vs BOKF vs BANR vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 104.2 | +4.2% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 260.1 | +160.1% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 174.8 | +74.8% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.3 | +5.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVBF vs BOKF vs BANR vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 4.0%
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 168.5% 10Y total return vs BANR's 101.1%
- +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2%
BANR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 19.1%, current ratio 0.02x
- PEG 0.91 vs CVBF's 4.44
- Beta 0.80, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.02x
- NIM 3.6% vs BOKF's 2.4%
FFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.91 vs 3.04 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs BOKF's 1.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% |
CVBF vs BOKF vs BANR vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CVBF vs BOKF vs BANR vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories
BANR leads 1 • FFIN leads 1 • BOKF leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BOKF is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.4B annually — 5.2x CVBF's $643M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BOKF's 15.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $643M | $3.4B | $819M | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $294M | $797M | $253M | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $209M | $537M | $195M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $217M | $1.5B | $248M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.9% | +57.1% | +79.0% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +19.8% | +29.5% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +15.6% | +23.8% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +42.6% | +30.3% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +1.8% | +11.2% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BANR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 44% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.00x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $10.3B | $2.2B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $13.3B | $2.4B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.49x | 16.39x | 11.63x | 20.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.12x | 12.88x | 10.51x | 15.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.25x | 5.51x | 1.00x | 3.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.02x | 17.23x | 9.55x | 14.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.33x | 3.06x | 2.71x | 6.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.53x | 1.16x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.81x | 7.19x | 8.96x | 15.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for BOKF. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BOKF's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BANR scores 7/9 vs FFIN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +8.9% | +10.3% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +4.1% | +7.7% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +5.5% | +10.1% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.80x | 0.19x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $883M | $3.0B | $190M | -$566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $108M | $1.4B | $183M | $763M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $991M | $4.5B | $373M | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.12x | 0.55x | 1.11x | 1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BOKF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BOKF five years ago would be worth $15,944 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, BOKF leads with a +44.8% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.7% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +13.0% | +6.6% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.1% | +44.8% | +9.1% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.0% | +79.4% | +60.7% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | +59.4% | +29.6% | -28.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.6% | +168.5% | +101.1% | +145.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.7% | +21.5% | +17.1% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BOKF and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BOKF currently trades 95.5% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 1.00x | 0.79x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.48 | $139.73 | $69.83 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.95 | $91.35 | $57.05 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +95.5% | +93.9% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 58.9 | 58.0 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 317K | 292K | 740K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and BOKF and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CVBF as "Hold", BOKF as "Hold", BANR as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.75 | $131.57 | $70.00 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 21 | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +1.7% | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 11 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $2.24 | $1.96 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +0.9% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). BANR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CVBF vs BOKF vs BANR vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVBF or BOKF or BANR or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVBF or BOKF or BANR or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
6x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Banner Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 91x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVBF or BOKF or BANR or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) delivered a total return of +59.
4%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BOKF returned +166. 8% versus CVBF's +66. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVBF or BOKF or BANR or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banner Corporation (BANR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 00β — meaning BOKF is approximately 26% more volatile than BANR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 80% for BOK Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVBF or BOKF or BANR or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banner Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to 1. 5% for BOK Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVBF or BOKF or BANR or FFIN?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 15. 6% for BOK Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 19. 8% for BOKF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVBF or BOKF or BANR or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Banner Corporation (BANR) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVBF or BOKF or BANR or FFIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 7% for BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF).
09Is CVBF or BOKF or BANR or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 3. 0% yield, +101. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANR: +101. 4%, BOKF: +166. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVBF and BOKF and BANR and FFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.