Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CVBF vs COLB vs WAFD vs BANR vs FFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CVBF vs COLB vs WAFD vs BANR vs FFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.78B | $7.04B | $2.73B | $2.22B | $4.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $643M | $3.21B | $1.41B | $819M | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $209M | $550M | $243M | $195M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 79.9% | 67.7% | 50.9% | 79.0% | 70.8% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | 23.4% | 20.5% | 29.5% | 36.8% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 9.7x | 10.9x | 10.5x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $991M | $4.01B | $1.82B | $373M | $197M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $108M | $511M | $657M | $183M | $763M |
CVBF vs COLB vs WAFD vs BANR vs FFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.1 | +5.1% |
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVBF vs COLB vs WAFD vs BANR vs FFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVBF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.94, yield 4.0%
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2%
COLB is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +32.6% vs FFIN's -3.2%
WAFD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality and efficiency.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5%
BANR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 101.1% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 84.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 19.1%, current ratio 0.02x
- PEG 0.90 vs CVBF's 4.48
- Beta 0.80, yield 3.0%, current ratio 0.02x
FFIN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 15.9x), PEG 0.90 vs 3.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs COLB's 1.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs FFIN's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% |
CVBF vs COLB vs WAFD vs BANR vs FFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CVBF vs COLB vs WAFD vs BANR vs FFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CVBF leads in 2 of 6 categories
BANR leads 1 • FFIN leads 1 • COLB leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 5.0x CVBF's $643M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 16.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $643M | $3.2B | $1.4B | $819M | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $294M | $895M | $277M | $253M | $310M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $209M | $550M | $243M | $195M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $217M | $724M | $226M | $248M | $290M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.9% | +67.7% | +50.9% | +79.0% | +70.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +23.4% | +20.5% | +29.5% | +36.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +17.1% | +16.0% | +23.8% | +30.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +22.0% | +14.8% | +30.3% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +5.9% | +46.3% | +11.2% | -7.7% |
Valuation Metrics
BANR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 44% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.00x vs WAFD's 4.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $7.0B | $2.7B | $2.2B | $4.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $10.5B | $3.9B | $2.4B | $4.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.49x | 12.85x | 13.56x | 11.63x | 20.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.24x | 9.65x | 10.93x | 10.47x | 15.92x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.25x | — | 4.41x | 1.00x | 3.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.02x | 11.76x | 12.98x | 9.55x | 14.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.33x | 2.19x | 1.93x | 2.71x | 6.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.12x | 0.94x | 1.16x | 2.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.81x | 9.97x | 13.09x | 8.96x | 15.73x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $8 for WAFD. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WAFD's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WAFD scores 7/9 vs FFIN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +8.4% | +8.0% | +10.3% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.9% | +1.0% | +1.2% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +5.4% | +3.9% | +7.7% | +11.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +2.0% | +5.7% | +10.1% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.51x | 0.60x | 0.19x | 0.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $883M | $3.5B | $1.2B | $190M | -$566M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $108M | $511M | $657M | $183M | $763M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $991M | $4.0B | $1.8B | $373M | $197M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.12x | 0.82x | 0.48x | 1.11x | 1.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVBF leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANR five years ago would be worth $12,958 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, COLB leads with a +32.6% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.7% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | +6.2% | +11.9% | +6.6% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.1% | +32.6% | +28.5% | +9.1% | -3.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +94.0% | +75.3% | +51.6% | +60.7% | +29.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.2% | -18.1% | +22.5% | +29.6% | -28.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.6% | +51.1% | +84.4% | +101.1% | +145.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.7% | +20.6% | +14.9% | +17.1% | +8.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WAFD and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.37x | 0.81x | 0.80x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.48 | $32.70 | $36.12 | $69.83 | $38.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.95 | $21.91 | $26.31 | $57.05 | $28.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.5% | +90.4% | +98.8% | +93.9% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.9 | 60.4 | 68.3 | 58.0 | 58.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.7M | 661K | 292K | 740K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and FFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CVBF as "Hold", COLB as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold", BANR as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs -1.9% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.98% vs FFIN's 2.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.75 | $32.92 | $35.00 | $70.00 | $39.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 19 | 11 | 13 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +3.8% | +3.0% | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $1.13 | $1.05 | $1.96 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +1.5% | +3.7% | +1.6% | 0.0% |
CVBF leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BANR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CVBF vs COLB vs WAFD vs BANR vs FFIN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVBF or COLB or WAFD or BANR or FFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVBF or COLB or WAFD or BANR or FFIN?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
6x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 90x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVBF or COLB or WAFD or BANR or FFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Banner Corporation (BANR) delivered a total return of +29.
6%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus COLB's +51. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVBF or COLB or WAFD or BANR or FFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banner Corporation (BANR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 37β — meaning COLB is approximately 72% more volatile than BANR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 60% for WaFd, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVBF or COLB or WAFD or BANR or FFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Banner Corporation grew EPS 15. 6% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVBF or COLB or WAFD or BANR or FFIN?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVBF or COLB or WAFD or BANR or FFIN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 48x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVBF or COLB or WAFD or BANR or FFIN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN).
09Is CVBF or COLB or WAFD or BANR or FFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 3. 0% yield, +101. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANR: +101. 1%, COLB: +51. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVBF and COLB and WAFD and BANR and FFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.