Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CVBF vs ICE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
CVBF vs ICE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges |
| Market Cap | $2.80B | $86.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $643M | $12.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $209M | $3.30B |
| Gross Margin | 79.9% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | 38.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.3x | 19.1x |
| Total Debt | $991M | $20.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $108M | $837M |
CVBF vs ICE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| Intercontinental Ex… (ICE) | 100 | 157.7 | +57.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVBF vs ICE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (14.3x vs 19.1x)
- 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.3%
- +13.6% vs ICE's -11.3%
ICE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.33, yield 1.3%
- Rev growth 7.5%, EPS growth 20.7%
- 222.9% 10Y total return vs CVBF's 67.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.5% NII/revenue growth vs CVBF's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.3x vs 19.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CVBF's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs CVBF's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs ICE's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +13.6% vs ICE's -11.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs CVBF's 0.4% |
CVBF vs ICE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CVBF vs ICE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ICE is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.6B annually — 19.6x CVBF's $643M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ICE's 26.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $643M | $12.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $294M | $6.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $209M | $3.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $217M | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +79.9% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +43.8% | +38.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +32.5% | +26.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +33.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +23.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CVBF leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.6x trailing earnings, CVBF trades at a 49% valuation discount to ICE's 26.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ICE offers better value at 2.99x vs CVBF's 4.27x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $86.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $106.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.57x | 26.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.33x | 19.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.27x | 2.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.08x | 16.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.35x | 6.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 3.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.89x | 20.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ICE delivers a 11.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $9 for CVBF. CVBF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.43x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICE's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICE scores 9/9 vs CVBF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.3% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.3% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $883M | $19.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $108M | $837M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $991M | $20.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.12x | 6.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CVBF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ICE five years ago would be worth $14,243 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,190 for CVBF. Over the past 12 months, CVBF leads with a +13.6% total return vs ICE's -11.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CVBF at 24.9% vs ICE's 14.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.6% | -3.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +13.6% | -11.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +95.0% | +48.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.9% | +42.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.4% | +222.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.9% | +14.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CVBF and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICE is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CVBF's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVBF currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs ICE's 81.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.48 | $189.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.95 | $143.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.0% | +81.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CVBF and ICE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CVBF as "Hold" and ICE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for ICE (target: $196) vs 20.0% for CVBF (target: $25). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.96% vs ICE's 1.26%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.75 | $195.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.0% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | $1.93 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +1.6% |
CVBF leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ICE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CVBF vs ICE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVBF or ICE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger pick with 7. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the better valuation at 13. 6x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CVBF or ICE?
On trailing P/E, CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the cheapest at 13. 6x versus Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. at 26. 6x. On forward P/E, CVB Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 14. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. wins at 2. 15x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 51x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CVBF or ICE?
Over the past 5 years, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) delivered a total return of +42. 4%, compared to +11. 9% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ICE returned +222. 9% versus CVBF's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CVBF or ICE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 0. 94β — meaning CVBF is approximately 185% more volatile than ICE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 43% versus 70% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CVBF or ICE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is pulling ahead at 7. 5% versus -2. 3% for CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. grew EPS 20. 7% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for CVB Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CVBF or ICE?
CVB Financial Corp.
(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus 26. 1% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus 38. 7% for ICE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CVBF or ICE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 15x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 51x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) trades at 14. 3x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. — 4. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ICE: 27. 6% to $195. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — CVBF or ICE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 3% for Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE).
09Is CVBF or ICE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
(ICE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33), 1. 3% yield, +222. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ICE: +222. 9%, CVBF: +67. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CVBF and ICE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; ICE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.