Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CYCN vs MNKD vs ACAD vs PTCT vs RARE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CYCN vs MNKD vs ACAD vs PTCT vs RARE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $13M | $1.09B | $3.84B | $6.11B | $2.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $361M | $1.10B | $827M | $669M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-24M | $376M | $-187M | $-609M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 79.3% | 91.5% | 49.7% | 83.6% |
| Operating Margin | -239.8% | 4.1% | 7.4% | -8.3% | -83.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 176.0x | 55.6x | 9.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $473M | $52M | $492M | $1.28B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $75M | $178M | $985M | $434M |
CYCN vs MNKD vs ACAD vs PTCT vs RARE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyclerion Therapeut… (CYCN) | 100 | 3.9 | -96.1% |
| MannKind Corporation (MNKD) | 100 | 233.1 | +133.1% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 38.2 | -61.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CYCN vs MNKD vs ACAD vs PTCT vs RARE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CYCN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.98
- Lower volatility, beta 0.98, current ratio 5.15x
- Beta 0.98, current ratio 5.15x
- Beta 0.98 vs RARE's 1.36
MNKD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 34.3% margin vs CYCN's -170.1%
- 26.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -89.4%
PTCT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs ACAD's -23.4%
- 114.5% revenue growth vs CYCN's 3.7%
- Better valuation composite
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 114.5% revenue growth vs CYCN's 3.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs CYCN's -170.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.98 vs RARE's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.3% vs RARE's -27.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs RARE's -45.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs -89.4% |
CYCN vs MNKD vs ACAD vs PTCT vs RARE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CYCN vs MNKD vs ACAD vs PTCT vs RARE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PTCT leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACAD leads 1 • CYCN leads 0 • MNKD leads 0 • RARE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 528.1x CYCN's $2M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CYCN's -170.1%. On growth, MNKD holds the edge at +15.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $361M | $1.1B | $827M | $669M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $25M | $96M | -$37M | -$536M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$24M | $376M | -$187M | -$609M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $13M | $212M | -$169M | -$487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +79.3% | +91.5% | +49.7% | +83.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +4.1% | +7.4% | -8.3% | -83.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -170.1% | -6.6% | +34.3% | -22.6% | -91.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -159.8% | +3.5% | +19.4% | -20.4% | -72.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -43.2% | +15.1% | +9.7% | -76.8% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | -2.2% | -81.8% | -100.3% | -17.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PTCT leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 95% valuation discount to MNKD's 176.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MNKD's 29.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $1.1B | $3.8B | $6.1B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $1.5B | $3.7B | $5.6B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.84x | 176.00x | 9.78x | 9.47x | -4.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 55.62x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.09x | 26.71x | 6.27x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.47x | 3.12x | 3.58x | 3.53x | 3.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.10x | — | 3.13x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 79.44x | 36.48x | 8.70x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PTCT leads this category, winning 3 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs CYCN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -39.2% | — | +35.6% | — | -6.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -35.6% | -3.9% | +26.2% | -6.8% | -45.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -65.1% | +21.6% | +10.0% | — | -89.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -55.5% | +8.3% | +10.1% | +55.9% | -46.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.04x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $399M | -$126M | -$492M | $842M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $75M | $178M | $985M | $434M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $473M | $52M | $492M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.75x | — | -1.67x | -14.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PTCT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $18,943 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $566 for CYCN. Over the past 12 months, PTCT leads with a +73.3% total return vs RARE's -27.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PTCT at 9.9% vs CYCN's -19.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +131.3% | -37.1% | -14.3% | -4.0% | +10.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -1.9% | -24.0% | +32.3% | +73.3% | -27.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.6% | -9.3% | +3.9% | +32.7% | -44.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.3% | -13.5% | +6.6% | +89.4% | -76.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | -46.7% | -23.4% | +852.1% | -59.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.4% | -3.2% | +1.3% | +9.9% | -17.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CYCN and PTCT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CYCN is the less volatile stock with a 0.98 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PTCT currently trades 84.2% from its 52-week high vs CYCN's 36.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 1.09x | 1.11x | 1.03x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.48 | $6.51 | $27.81 | $87.50 | $42.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.03 | $2.23 | $14.68 | $39.53 | $18.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.6% | +54.1% | +80.5% | +84.2% | +61.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.9 | 73.8 | 53.8 | 40.0 | 67.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 6.0M | 1.7M | 1.1M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MNKD as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PTCT as "Buy", RARE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 134.4% upside for MNKD (target: $8) vs 33.0% for PTCT (target: $98).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $8.25 | $34.78 | $98.00 | $48.36 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 | 37 | 26 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PTCT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ACAD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
CYCN vs MNKD vs ACAD vs PTCT vs RARE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CYCN or MNKD or ACAD or PTCT or RARE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger pick with 114. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. (CYCN). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MannKind Corporation (MNKD) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CYCN or MNKD or ACAD or PTCT or RARE?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus MannKind Corporation at 176. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CYCN or MNKD or ACAD or PTCT or RARE?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -94. 3% for Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. (CYCN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +852. 1% versus CYCN's -98. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CYCN or MNKD or ACAD or PTCT or RARE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc.
(CYCN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 98β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning RARE is approximately 39% more volatile than CYCN relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — CYCN or MNKD or ACAD or PTCT or RARE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is pulling ahead at 114. 5% versus 3. 7% for Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. (CYCN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -79. 4% for MannKind Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CYCN leads at 91. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CYCN or MNKD or ACAD or PTCT or RARE?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -170. 1% for Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -239. 8% for CYCN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CYCN leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CYCN or MNKD or ACAD or PTCT or RARE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MNKD: 134.
4% to $8. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — CYCN or MNKD or ACAD or PTCT or RARE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CYCN or MNKD or ACAD or PTCT or RARE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +852. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +852. 1%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CYCN and MNKD and ACAD and PTCT and RARE?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CYCN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MNKD is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.