Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DAWN vs MRK vs PFE vs CRL vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Drug Manufacturers - General
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
DAWN vs MRK vs PFE vs CRL vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Drug Manufacturers - General | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $2.22B | $277.34B | $150.63B | $8.98B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $158M | $64.93B | $63.31B | $4.03B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-107M | $18.25B | $7.49B | $-185M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 89.1% | 74.2% | 69.3% | 24.9% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -80.8% | 41.1% | 23.4% | 11.8% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.9x | 8.9x | 16.4x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $50.53B | $67.42B | $3.07B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $197M | $14.56B | $1.14B | $214M | $1.98B |
DAWN vs MRK vs PFE vs CRL vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 21 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
| Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) | 100 | 166.3 | +66.3% |
| Pfizer Inc. (PFE) | 100 | 72.5 | -27.5% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 51.0 | -49.0% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 71.0 | -29.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAWN vs MRK vs PFE vs CRL vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAWN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.35, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 8.02x
- 20.6% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6%
- Beta 0.35 vs CRL's 1.52, lower leverage
- +241.7% vs IQV's +16.5%
MRK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and defensive is your priority.
- 166.5% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.5%
- Beta 0.48, yield 2.9%, current ratio 1.54x
- 28.1% margin vs DAWN's -67.8%
- 14.6% ROA vs DAWN's -20.7%, ROIC 22.0% vs -30.5%
PFE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 6.5%
- 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MRK's 2.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- PEG 0.35 vs MRK's 1.03
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.6% revenue growth vs PFE's -1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 28.1% margin vs DAWN's -67.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs CRL's 1.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.5% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MRK's 2.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +241.7% vs IQV's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.6% ROA vs DAWN's -20.7%, ROIC 22.0% vs -30.5% |
DAWN vs MRK vs PFE vs CRL vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DAWN vs MRK vs PFE vs CRL vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAWN leads in 2 of 6 categories
MRK leads 1 • PFE leads 1 • CRL leads 0 • IQV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DAWN and MRK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MRK is the larger business by revenue, generating $64.9B annually — 410.5x DAWN's $158M. MRK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DAWN's -67.8%. On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $158M | $64.9B | $63.3B | $4.0B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$124M | $32.4B | $21.0B | $757M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$107M | $18.3B | $7.5B | -$185M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$108M | $12.4B | $9.5B | $391M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +89.1% | +74.2% | +69.3% | +24.9% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -80.8% | +41.1% | +23.4% | +11.8% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -67.8% | +28.1% | +11.8% | -4.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -68.0% | +19.0% | +15.0% | +9.7% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.9% | +4.5% | +5.4% | +1.2% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.0% | -19.6% | -9.5% | -160.0% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PFE and IQV each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.4x trailing earnings, MRK trades at a 32% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs MRK's 0.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $277.3B | $150.6B | $9.0B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $313.3B | $216.9B | $11.8B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -20.70x | 15.42x | 19.47x | -62.52x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.93x | 8.94x | 16.42x | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.73x | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.68x | 10.66x | 12.98x | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 14.06x | 4.27x | 2.41x | 2.24x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.05x | 5.35x | 1.74x | 2.81x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.44x | 16.60x | 17.31x | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MRK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MRK delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-23 for DAWN. DAWN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PFE scores 7/9 vs IQV's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -23.4% | +36.1% | +8.3% | -5.7% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -20.7% | +14.6% | +3.6% | -2.5% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -30.5% | +22.0% | +7.5% | +6.3% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -26.7% | +23.8% | +9.0% | +8.1% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.96x | 0.78x | 0.95x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$194M | $36.0B | $66.3B | $2.9B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $197M | $14.6B | $1.1B | $214M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $50.5B | $67.4B | $3.1B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 19.68x | 4.02x | 6.38x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAWN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MRK five years ago would be worth $17,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,311 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, DAWN leads with a +241.7% total return vs IQV's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAWN at 18.2% vs PFE's -6.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +143.3% | +6.3% | +6.9% | -10.1% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +241.7% | +46.1% | +23.7% | +32.8% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.1% | +2.9% | -18.4% | -4.2% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.4% | +70.2% | -13.3% | -46.9% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.4% | +166.5% | +29.6% | +119.2% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.2% | +0.9% | -6.6% | -1.4% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
DAWN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRL's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.35x | 0.48x | 0.54x | 1.52x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.53 | $125.14 | $28.75 | $228.88 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.64 | $73.31 | $21.97 | $131.30 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +89.7% | +92.1% | +79.5% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.3 | 46.7 | 44.2 | 57.2 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.9M | 7.3M | 33.3M | 806K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
PFE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DAWN as "Buy", MRK as "Buy", PFE as "Hold", CRL as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.3% upside for IQV (target: $226) vs 3.0% for PFE (target: $27). For income investors, PFE offers the higher dividend yield at 6.49% vs MRK's 2.90%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.75 | $129.31 | $27.27 | $205.43 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 37 | 39 | 36 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% | +6.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 14 | 15 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.26 | $1.72 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +4.1% |
DAWN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). MRK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
DAWN vs MRK vs PFE vs CRL vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAWN or MRK or PFE or CRL or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger pick with 20. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). Merck & Co. , Inc. (MRK) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (21. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (DAWN) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAWN or MRK or PFE or CRL or IQV?
On trailing P/E, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, Pfizer Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Merck & Co. , Inc. 's 1. 03x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAWN or MRK or PFE or CRL or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) delivered a total return of +70. 2%, compared to -46. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +166. 5% versus DAWN's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAWN or MRK or PFE or CRL or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 35β versus Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning CRL is approximately 329% more volatile than DAWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (DAWN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAWN or MRK or PFE or CRL or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is pulling ahead at 20. 6% versus -1. 6% for Pfizer Inc. (PFE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Merck & Co. , Inc. grew EPS 8. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQV leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAWN or MRK or PFE or CRL or IQV?
Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 1% net margin versus -67. 8% for Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MRK leads at 36. 2% versus -80. 8% for DAWN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAWN leads at 89. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAWN or MRK or PFE or CRL or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Merck & Co. , Inc. 's 1. 03x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pfizer Inc. (PFE) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 21. 9x for Merck & Co. , Inc. — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IQV: 26. 3% to $225. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAWN or MRK or PFE or CRL or IQV?
In this comparison, PFE (6.
5% yield), MRK (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. DAWN, CRL, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DAWN or MRK or PFE or CRL or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Merck & Co.
, Inc. (MRK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 2. 9% yield, +166. 5% 10Y return). Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRK: +166. 5%, CRL: +119. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAWN and MRK and PFE and CRL and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MRK is a large-cap deep-value stock; PFE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MRK, PFE pay a dividend while DAWN, CRL, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.