Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

DBD vs NATL vs JKHY vs FISV vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.75B
5Y Perf.+172.4%
NATL
NCR Atleos Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.26B
5Y Perf.+82.2%
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.57B
5Y Perf.-10.6%
FISV
Fiserv, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$30.38B
5Y Perf.-57.2%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$24.47B
5Y Perf.-21.3%

DBD vs NATL vs JKHY vs FISV vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
DBD logoDBD
NATL logoNATL
JKHY logoJKHY
FISV logoFISV
FIS logoFIS
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationSoftware - ApplicationInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology ServicesInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$2.75B$3.26B$10.57B$30.38B$24.47B
Revenue (TTM)$3.86B$4.38B$2.52B$21.09B$10.89B
Net Income (TTM)$110M$174M$519M$3.20B$382M
Gross Margin26.0%24.1%44.1%60.8%38.1%
Operating Margin8.0%5.7%26.0%24.4%17.5%
Forward P/E14.4x9.1x21.8x7.0x7.5x
Total Debt$1.17B$225M$0.00$29.12B$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$387M$456M$102M$798M$599M

DBD vs NATL vs JKHY vs FISV vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

DBD
NATL
JKHY
FISV
FIS
StockDec 23May 26Return
Diebold Nixdorf, In… (DBD)100272.4+172.4%
NCR Atleos Corporat… (NATL)100182.2+82.2%
Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY)10089.4-10.6%
Fiserv, Inc. (FISV)10042.8-57.2%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10078.7-21.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: DBD vs NATL vs JKHY vs FISV vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: JKHY leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. FISV also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated
The Long-Run Compounder

DBD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 289.1% 10Y total return vs NATL's 99.0%
  • +79.3% vs FISV's -68.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
NATL
NCR Atleos Corporation
The Value Angle

NATL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
JKHY
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
The Growth Play

JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, current ratio 1.27x
  • Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
  • 7.2% revenue growth vs NATL's 0.9%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
FISV
Fiserv, Inc.
The Value Pick

FISV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.20 vs JKHY's 2.16
  • Lower P/E (7.0x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.31
Best for: valuation efficiency
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 3.5%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthJKHY logoJKHY7.2% revenue growth vs NATL's 0.9%
ValueFISV logoFISVLower P/E (7.0x vs 7.5x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.31
Quality / MarginsJKHY logoJKHY20.6% margin vs DBD's 2.8%
Stability / SafetyJKHY logoJKHYBeta 0.28 vs DBD's 1.21
DividendsJKHY logoJKHY1.5% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs FIS's 3.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)DBD logoDBD+79.3% vs FISV's -68.8%
Efficiency (ROA)JKHY logoJKHY17.0% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.0%

DBD vs NATL vs JKHY vs FISV vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

DBDDiebold Nixdorf, Incorporated
FY 2025
Service
57.0%$2.2B
Product
43.0%$1.6B
NATLNCR Atleos Corporation
FY 2025
Recurring Revenue
70.6%$3.1B
All Other Products And Services
29.4%$1.3B
JKHYJack Henry & Associates, Inc.
FY 2025
Payments
38.2%$873M
Core Segment
32.3%$739M
Complementary
29.5%$675M
FISVFiserv, Inc.
FY 2024
Processing And Services
81.3%$16.6B
Product
18.7%$3.8B
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

DBD vs NATL vs JKHY vs FISV vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLJKHYLAGGINGFIS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

JKHY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 8.4x JKHY's $2.5B. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DBD's 2.8%. On growth, JKHY holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricDBD logoDBDDiebold Nixdorf, …NATL logoNATLNCR Atleos Corpor…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.9B$4.4B$2.5B$21.1B$10.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$400M$357M$810M$7.5B$3.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$110M$174M$519M$3.2B$382M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$266M$82M$728M$4.0B$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+26.0%+24.1%+44.1%+60.8%+38.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.0%+5.7%+26.0%+24.4%+17.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+2.8%+4.0%+20.6%+15.2%+3.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.9%+1.9%+28.9%+19.0%+26.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+6.0%+6.4%+8.7%-2.0%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+163.6%+26.1%+12.5%-29.1%+92.3%
JKHY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 9.0x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricDBD logoDBDDiebold Nixdorf, …NATL logoNATLNCR Atleos Corpor…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$2.7B$3.3B$10.6B$30.4B$24.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.5B$3.0B$10.5B$58.7B$27.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS31.05x20.68x23.40x8.96x63.00x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.37x9.14x21.79x7.01x7.54x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.32x0.25x2.58x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.64x4.02x13.53x6.63x7.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.72x0.75x4.45x1.43x2.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.66x8.32x5.01x1.21x1.76x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.43x13.66x17.97x7.00x9.97x
FISV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

JKHY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NATL delivers a 47.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DBD scores 6/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricDBD logoDBDDiebold Nixdorf, …NATL logoNATLNCR Atleos Corpor…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.1%+47.0%+24.0%+12.4%+2.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.9%+3.1%+17.0%+4.0%+1.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+14.0%+23.4%+21.0%+8.1%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.1%+12.5%+22.7%+10.2%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966656
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.06x0.56x1.13x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$787M-$231M-$102M$28.3B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$387M$456M$102M$798M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.2B$225M$0$29.1B$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense6.68x2.62x122.37x6.39x4.64x
JKHY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

DBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in DBD five years ago would be worth $38,342 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, DBD leads with a +79.3% total return vs FISV's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBD at 56.5% vs FISV's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricDBD logoDBDDiebold Nixdorf, …NATL logoNATLNCR Atleos Corpor…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+23.3%+18.9%-17.8%-13.4%-27.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+79.3%+50.3%-13.6%-68.8%-35.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+283.4%+97.8%-1.0%-52.5%-6.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+283.4%+97.8%+0.3%-51.7%-63.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+289.1%+99.0%+94.9%+9.7%-13.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+56.5%+25.5%-0.3%-22.0%-2.2%
DBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NATL and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBD's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NATL currently trades 91.3% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricDBD logoDBDDiebold Nixdorf, …NATL logoNATLNCR Atleos Corpor…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.21x1.16x0.28x0.94x0.76x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$89.05$48.50$193.39$191.91$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$43.61$23.56$141.81$52.91$43.30
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.6%+91.3%+75.5%+29.6%+57.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.454.328.236.543.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded460K1.2M902K5.3M5.5M
Evenly matched — NATL and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — JKHY and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: DBD as "Buy", NATL as "Hold", JKHY as "Buy", FISV as "Buy", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 13.9% for NATL (target: $50). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs JKHY's 1.54%.

MetricDBD logoDBDDiebold Nixdorf, …NATL logoNATLNCR Atleos Corpor…JKHY logoJKHYJack Henry & Asso…FISV logoFISVFiserv, Inc.FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$100.00$50.40$203.75$74.64$67.38
# AnalystsCovering analysts134226037
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+3.5%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0321
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.25$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+4.8%+0.9%+0.3%+19.4%0.0%
Evenly matched — JKHY and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallJack Henry & Associates, In… (JKHY)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

DBD vs NATL vs JKHY vs FISV vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is DBD or NATL or JKHY or FISV or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 9% for NCR Atleos Corporation (NATL). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — DBD or NATL or JKHY or FISV or FIS?

On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.

(FISV) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — DBD or NATL or JKHY or FISV or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) delivered a total return of +283.

4%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DBD returned +289. 1% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — DBD or NATL or JKHY or FISV or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated's 1. 21β — meaning DBD is approximately 328% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — DBD or NATL or JKHY or FISV or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus 0. 9% for NCR Atleos Corporation (NATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated grew EPS 677. 3% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — DBD or NATL or JKHY or FISV or FIS?

Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 2. 5% for Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 8. 8% for DBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FISV leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is DBD or NATL or JKHY or FISV or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.

08

Which pays a better dividend — DBD or NATL or JKHY or FISV or FIS?

In this comparison, FIS (3.

5% yield), JKHY (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. DBD, NATL, FISV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is DBD or NATL or JKHY or FISV or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.

(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, NATL: +99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between DBD and NATL and JKHY and FISV and FIS?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DBD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NATL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. JKHY, FIS pay a dividend while DBD, NATL, FISV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

DBD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NATL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

JKHY

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FISV

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform DBD and NATL and JKHY and FISV and FIS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(DBD: 6.0% · NATL: 6.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(DBD: 2.8% · NATL: 4.0%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(DBD: 31.1x · NATL: 20.7x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.