DFLI
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$14M
5Y Perf.-97.7%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
DFLI vs FLUX vs SHLS vs BEEM vs STEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$18M
5Y Perf.-87.7%
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
Solar
Market Cap$1.48B
5Y Perf.-72.9%
BEEM
Beam Global
Solar
Market Cap$35M
5Y Perf.-94.0%
STEM
Stem, Inc.
Software - Infrastructure
Market Cap$78M
5Y Perf.-98.2%
DFLI vs FLUX vs SHLS vs BEEM vs STEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | DFLI | FLUX | SHLS | BEEM | STEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar | Solar | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $14M | $18M | $1.48B | $35M | $78M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58M | $51M | $536M | $28M | $149M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $-6M | $34M | $-29M | $139M |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 32.1% | 33.5% | 15.0% | 32.5% |
| Operating Margin | -34.8% | -1.9% | 11.2% | -108.4% | -46.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 21.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $55M | $16M | $175M | $2M | $369M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $1M | $7M | $5M | $49M |
DFLI vs FLUX vs SHLS vs BEEM vs STEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
DFLI
FLUX
SHLS
BEEM
STEM
| Stock | Aug 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dragonfly Energy Ho… (DFLI) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Flux Power Holdings… (FLUX) | 100 | 12.3 | -87.7% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 27.1 | -72.9% |
| Beam Global (BEEM) | 100 | 6.0 | -94.0% |
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DFLI vs FLUX vs SHLS vs BEEM vs STEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: STEM leads in 2 of 6 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. FLUX and SHLS also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
DFLI
Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp.
The Momentum Pick
DFLI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +322.4% vs FLUX's -48.7%
Best for: momentum
FLUX
Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick
FLUX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- beta 2.23
- Beta 2.23 vs STEM's 3.78
Best for: income & stability
SHLS
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
The Growth Play
SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 42.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- -71.5% 10Y total return vs FLUX's -76.0%
- Beta 2.23, current ratio 2.03x
- 19.1% revenue growth vs BEEM's -26.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
BEEM
Beam Global
The Defensive Pick
BEEM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.64, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 2.04x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
STEM
Stem, Inc.
The Quality Compounder
STEM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and efficiency.
- 93.3% margin vs BEEM's -105.9%
- 41.8% ROA vs BEEM's -65.7%, ROIC -52.6% vs -22.1%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SHLS | 19.1% revenue growth vs BEEM's -26.8% |
| Quality / Margins | STEM | 93.3% margin vs BEEM's -105.9% |
| Stability / Safety | FLUX | Beta 2.23 vs STEM's 3.78 |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | DFLI | +322.4% vs FLUX's -48.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | STEM | 41.8% ROA vs BEEM's -65.7%, ROIC -52.6% vs -22.1% |
DFLI vs FLUX vs SHLS vs BEEM vs STEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2025
DFLI vs FLUX vs SHLS vs BEEM vs STEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSHLSLAGGINGSTEM
Who Leads Where
SHLS leads in 2 of 6 categories
FLUX leads 1 • DFLI leads 0 • BEEM leads 0 • STEM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓STEMStem, Inc.
0leads
BEEMBeam Global
0leads
DFLIDragonfly Energy Hold…
0leads
FLUXFlux Power Holdings, …
1leads
SHLSShoals Technologies G…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FLUXvs DFLIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SHLS3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FLUX2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
Tied
—
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SHLS4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $536M annually — 19.4x BEEM's $28M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 93.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BEEM's -105.9%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | DFLIDragonfly Energy … | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… | BEEMBeam Global | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $58M | $51M | $536M | $28M | $149M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | -$212,000 | $73M | -$25M | -$27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | -$6M | $34M | -$29M | $139M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$7M | -$77M | -$7M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +32.1% | +33.5% | +15.0% | +32.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.8% | -1.9% | +11.2% | -108.4% | -46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -60.1% | -12.5% | +6.3% | -105.9% | +93.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.7% | -14.7% | -14.5% | -24.0% | -5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.5% | -60.6% | +74.9% | -49.6% | -21.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.6% | -25.0% | — | -4.2% | +27.2% |
SHLS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FLUX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | DFLIDragonfly Energy … | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… | BEEMBeam Global | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $18M | $1.5B | $35M | $78M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $65M | $32M | $1.7B | $32M | $398M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.35x | -2.52x | 44.20x | -2.42x | -1.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 21.48x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 25.41x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 0.27x | 3.12x | 0.70x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 2.48x | 0.66x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 11.37x |
FLUX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SHLS and BEEM and STEM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHLS delivers a 5.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-7 for FLUX. BEEM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHLS's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLUX scores 6/9 vs DFLI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | DFLIDragonfly Energy … | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… | BEEMBeam Global | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.4% | -7.4% | +5.7% | -110.5% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.0% | -21.0% | +3.7% | -65.7% | +41.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -48.6% | -30.1% | +5.9% | -22.1% | -52.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.4% | — | +7.6% | -21.4% | -22.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.29x | 0.05x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | $15M | $168M | -$3M | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $1M | $7M | $5M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $16M | $175M | $2M | $369M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.52x | -1.19x | 5.91x | -715.85x | 5.93x |
Evenly matched — SHLS and BEEM and STEM each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHLS five years ago would be worth $3,005 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $234 for DFLI. Over the past 12 months, DFLI leads with a +322.4% total return vs FLUX's -48.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHLS at -23.5% vs DFLI's -63.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | DFLIDragonfly Energy … | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… | BEEMBeam Global | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.5% | -28.9% | -2.8% | +14.8% | -46.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +322.4% | -48.7% | +83.4% | +25.7% | -17.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.0% | -73.7% | -55.2% | -81.1% | -89.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -88.4% | -70.0% | -92.9% | -97.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -76.0% | -71.5% | -76.9% | -95.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.1% | -35.9% | -23.5% | -42.6% | -52.1% |
SHLS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLUX and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLUX is the less volatile stock with a 2.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHLS currently trades 77.8% from its 52-week high vs FLUX's 13.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | DFLIDragonfly Energy … | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… | BEEMBeam Global | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.68x | 2.23x | 2.23x | 2.64x | 3.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.15 | $7.55 | $11.36 | $4.04 | $32.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $0.91 | $3.81 | $1.33 | $5.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.2% | +13.4% | +77.8% | +46.0% | +28.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.3 | 54.8 | 54.8 | 60.2 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 457K | 127K | 5.1M | 489K | 159K |
Evenly matched — FLUX and SHLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DFLI as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy", STEM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 315.5% upside for DFLI (target: $9) vs -1.0% for SHLS (target: $9).
| Metric | DFLIDragonfly Energy … | FLUXFlux Power Holdin… | SHLSShoals Technologi… | BEEMBeam Global | STEMStem, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Buy | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.60 | — | $8.75 | — | $20.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | — | 23 | — | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SHLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FLUX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallShoals Technologies Group, … (SHLS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
DFLI vs FLUX vs SHLS vs BEEM vs STEM: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DFLI or FLUX or SHLS or BEEM or STEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 8% for Beam Global (BEEM). Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) offers the better valuation at 44. 2x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — DFLI or FLUX or SHLS or BEEM or STEM?
Over the past 5 years, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) delivered a total return of -70. 0%, compared to -97. 7% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHLS returned -71. 5% versus DFLI's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — DFLI or FLUX or SHLS or BEEM or STEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flux Power Holdings, Inc.
(FLUX) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 23β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 78β — meaning STEM is approximately 70% more volatile than FLUX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Beam Global (BEEM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 29% for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — DFLI or FLUX or SHLS or BEEM or STEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -26. 8% for Beam Global (BEEM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -152. 6% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BEEM leads at 76. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — DFLI or FLUX or SHLS or BEEM or STEM?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -80. 2% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -50. 9% for DFLI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — STEM leads at 38. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is DFLI or FLUX or SHLS or BEEM or STEM more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DFLI: 315.
5% to $8. 60.
07Which pays a better dividend — DFLI or FLUX or SHLS or BEEM or STEM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is DFLI or FLUX or SHLS or BEEM or STEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI) carries a higher beta of 2. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHLS: -71. 5%, DFLI: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between DFLI and FLUX and SHLS and BEEM and STEM?
These companies operate in different sectors (DFLI (Industrials) and FLUX (Industrials) and SHLS (Energy) and BEEM (Energy) and STEM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DFLI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLUX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BEEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(DFLI: 25.5% · FLUX: -60.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.