Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DFLI vs SHLS vs ENPH vs STEM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Software - Infrastructure
DFLI vs SHLS vs ENPH vs STEM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Solar | Solar | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $14M | $1.32B | $4.67B | $74M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58M | $536M | $1.40B | $153M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $34M | $135M | $144M |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 33.5% | 44.2% | 36.3% |
| Operating Margin | -34.8% | 11.2% | 6.8% | -35.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 21.5x | 18.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $55M | $175M | $1.24B | $369M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $7M | $474M | $49M |
DFLI vs SHLS vs ENPH vs STEM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dragonfly Energy Ho… (DFLI) | 100 | 2.3 | -97.7% |
| Shoals Technologies… (SHLS) | 100 | 27.1 | -72.9% |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) | 100 | 21.0 | -79.0% |
| Stem, Inc. (STEM) | 100 | 1.8 | -98.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DFLI vs SHLS vs ENPH vs STEM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DFLI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +309.9% vs ENPH's -18.9%
SHLS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.1%, EPS growth 42.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.3%
- 19.1% revenue growth vs DFLI's -21.3%
ENPH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.70
- 17.4% 10Y total return vs SHLS's -74.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 1.70, current ratio 2.07x
STEM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 94.2% margin vs DFLI's -60.1%
- 43.2% ROA vs DFLI's -47.0%, ROIC -57.1% vs -48.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.1% revenue growth vs DFLI's -21.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.0x vs 21.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.2% margin vs DFLI's -60.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.70 vs STEM's 3.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +309.9% vs ENPH's -18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 43.2% ROA vs DFLI's -47.0%, ROIC -57.1% vs -48.6% |
DFLI vs SHLS vs ENPH vs STEM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DFLI vs SHLS vs ENPH vs STEM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ENPH leads in 2 of 6 categories
DFLI leads 0 • SHLS leads 0 • STEM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SHLS and ENPH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENPH is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 24.2x DFLI's $58M. STEM is the more profitable business, keeping 94.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DFLI's -60.1%. On growth, SHLS holds the edge at +74.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $58M | $536M | $1.4B | $153M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $73M | $171M | -$16M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $34M | $135M | $144M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$77M | $145M | -$8M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +33.5% | +44.2% | +36.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -34.8% | +11.2% | +6.8% | -35.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -60.1% | +6.3% | +9.6% | +94.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -28.7% | -14.5% | +10.4% | -5.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.5% | +74.9% | -20.6% | -10.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +79.6% | — | -127.3% | +27.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ENPH and STEM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.5x trailing earnings, ENPH trades at a 30% valuation discount to SHLS's 39.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ENPH's 22.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHLS's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $1.3B | $4.7B | $74M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $65M | $1.5B | $5.4B | $394M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.35x | 39.20x | 27.50x | -0.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 21.48x | 18.04x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.36x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 22.83x | 22.19x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.28x | 2.77x | 3.17x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.20x | 4.40x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 48.75x | 10.82x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENPH delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-4 for DFLI. SHLS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ENPH's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ENPH scores 6/9 vs DFLI's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.4% | +5.7% | +13.3% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -47.0% | +3.7% | +4.2% | +43.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -48.6% | +5.9% | +6.8% | -57.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.4% | +7.6% | +6.8% | -23.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.29x | 1.14x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $50M | $168M | $769M | $320M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $7M | $474M | $49M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $55M | $175M | $1.2B | $369M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.52x | 5.91x | 47.60x | 14.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENPH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENPH five years ago would be worth $2,885 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $217 for STEM. Over the past 12 months, DFLI leads with a +309.9% total return vs ENPH's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHLS at -26.5% vs DFLI's -63.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.5% | -13.8% | +5.1% | -48.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +309.9% | +66.5% | -18.9% | -16.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.0% | -60.2% | -78.3% | -89.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -72.8% | -71.2% | -97.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.7% | -74.7% | +1737.8% | -95.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.1% | -26.5% | -39.9% | -52.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SHLS and ENPH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ENPH is the less volatile stock with a 1.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than STEM's 3.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHLS currently trades 69.0% from its 52-week high vs STEM's 27.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.68x | 2.23x | 1.69x | 3.78x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.15 | $11.36 | $54.43 | $32.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $3.81 | $25.78 | $5.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.2% | +69.0% | +65.2% | +27.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 63.2 | 52.1 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 458K | 5.1M | 5.9M | 155K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DFLI as "Buy", SHLS as "Buy", ENPH as "Hold", STEM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 315.5% upside for DFLI (target: $9) vs 11.6% for SHLS (target: $9).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.60 | $8.75 | $42.41 | $20.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 23 | 55 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +2.8% | 0.0% |
ENPH leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
DFLI vs SHLS vs ENPH vs STEM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DFLI or SHLS or ENPH or STEM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is the stronger pick with 19. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 3% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI). Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) offers the better valuation at 27. 5x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DFLI or SHLS or ENPH or STEM?
On trailing P/E, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the cheapest at 27. 5x versus Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. at 39. 2x. On forward P/E, Enphase Energy, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DFLI or SHLS or ENPH or STEM?
Over the past 5 years, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) delivered a total return of -71. 2%, compared to -97. 8% for Stem, Inc. (STEM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENPH returned +1789% versus DFLI's -97. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DFLI or SHLS or ENPH or STEM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus Stem, Inc. 's 3. 78β — meaning STEM is approximately 124% more volatile than ENPH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. (SHLS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 114% for Enphase Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DFLI or SHLS or ENPH or STEM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
(SHLS) is pulling ahead at 19. 1% versus -21. 3% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stem, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to -152. 6% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHLS leads at 13. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DFLI or SHLS or ENPH or STEM?
Stem, Inc.
(STEM) is the more profitable company, earning 88. 2% net margin versus -80. 2% for Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 88. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHLS leads at 11. 9% versus -50. 9% for DFLI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ENPH leads at 46. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DFLI or SHLS or ENPH or STEM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Shoals Technologies Group, Inc. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DFLI: 315. 5% to $8. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — DFLI or SHLS or ENPH or STEM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DFLI or SHLS or ENPH or STEM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Enphase Energy, Inc.
(ENPH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1789% 10Y return). Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp. (DFLI) carries a higher beta of 2. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ENPH: +1789%, DFLI: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DFLI and SHLS and ENPH and STEM?
These companies operate in different sectors (DFLI (Industrials) and SHLS (Energy) and ENPH (Energy) and STEM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DFLI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SHLS is a small-cap high-growth stock; ENPH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STEM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.