Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DGICA vs HRTG vs NODK vs HCI vs PLMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
DGICA vs HRTG vs NODK vs HCI vs PLMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $625M | $861M | $267M | $1.99B | $3.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $978M | $847M | $298M | $927M | $874M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $79M | $196M | $3M | $314M | $197M |
| Gross Margin | 26.7% | 47.2% | 13.3% | 66.5% | 56.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 31.7% | 1.5% | 47.9% | 29.0% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 6.1x | — | 9.2x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $100M | $0.00 | $68M | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $559M | $678K | $1.21B | $107M |
DGICA vs HRTG vs NODK vs HCI vs PLMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA) | 100 | 120.8 | +20.8% |
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 223.5 | +123.5% |
| NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) | 100 | 86.2 | -13.8% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 340.8 | +240.8% |
| Palomar Holdings, I… (PLMR) | 100 | 152.6 | +52.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DGICA vs HRTG vs NODK vs HCI vs PLMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DGICA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 4.8%
- Beta 0.34, yield 4.8%, current ratio 0.74x
- 4.8% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs HCI's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
HRTG has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and momentum.
- Better valuation composite
- +15.3% vs PLMR's -27.6%
Among these 5 stocks, NODK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
HCI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- Combined ratio 0.5 vs DGICA's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting)
- 13.2% ROA vs NODK's 0.5%
PLMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- 498.1% 10Y total return vs HCI's 436.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.24, Low D/E 0.8%
- PEG 0.12 vs DGICA's 2.55
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.2% revenue growth vs NODK's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.5 vs DGICA's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.24 vs NODK's 0.57 | |
| Dividends | 4.8% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs HCI's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.3% vs PLMR's -27.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs NODK's 0.5% |
DGICA vs HRTG vs NODK vs HCI vs PLMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DGICA vs HRTG vs NODK vs HCI vs PLMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 2 of 6 categories
HRTG leads 2 • DGICA leads 1 • NODK leads 0 • PLMR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DGICA is the larger business by revenue, generating $978M annually — 3.3x NODK's $298M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NODK's 0.9%. On growth, PLMR holds the edge at +62.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $978M | $847M | $298M | $927M | $874M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $101M | $281M | $5M | $454M | $265M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $79M | $196M | $3M | $314M | $197M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $70M | $177M | -$7M | $431M | $406M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +47.2% | +13.3% | +66.5% | +56.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +31.7% | +1.5% | +47.9% | +29.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +23.1% | +0.9% | +33.9% | +22.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +20.8% | -2.4% | +46.4% | +46.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.9% | +2.4% | -14.0% | +11.9% | +62.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.6% | +2.3% | +38.5% | +23.4% | +59.7% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.4x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 72% valuation discount to PLMR's 15.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.06x vs DGICA's 2.22x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $625M | $861M | $267M | $2.0B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $634M | $402M | $266M | $844M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7.90x | 4.44x | — | 6.15x | 15.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.07x | 6.07x | — | 9.19x | 11.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.22x | 0.06x | — | 0.13x | 0.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.29x | 1.48x | — | 1.92x | 11.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 1.02x | — | 2.20x | 3.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.84x | 1.72x | — | 1.77x | 3.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.91x | 4.94x | 133.00x | 4.47x | 7.36x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG delivers a 47.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $1 for NODK. PLMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HRTG's 0.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs NODK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +47.3% | +1.1% | +32.0% | +22.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.3% | +8.4% | +0.5% | +13.2% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.4% | +15.4% | — | +6.8% | +25.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.2% | +11.1% | — | +40.6% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.20x | — | 0.06x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | -$459M | -$678,000 | -$1.1B | -$100M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $559M | $678,000 | $1.2B | $107M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $100M | $0 | $68M | $7M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 73.26x | 33.88x | — | 67.24x | 649.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $30,138 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,916 for NODK. Over the past 12 months, HRTG leads with a +15.3% total return vs PLMR's -27.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 89.9% vs NODK's -0.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.5% | +2.7% | -2.6% | -16.7% | -13.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.9% | +15.3% | +4.3% | +2.4% | -27.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.2% | +585.3% | -2.7% | +209.6% | +124.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +35.8% | +201.4% | -30.8% | +105.3% | +68.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.0% | +119.4% | -12.4% | +436.8% | +498.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.6% | +89.9% | -0.9% | +45.7% | +30.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NODK and PLMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PLMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NODK's 0.57 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NODK currently trades 87.9% from its 52-week high vs PLMR's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.34x | 0.50x | 0.57x | 0.39x | 0.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.12 | $31.98 | $14.70 | $210.50 | $175.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.11 | $16.83 | $12.01 | $136.37 | $107.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +87.6% | +87.9% | +72.6% | +64.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.2 | 55.7 | 47.5 | 48.7 | 27.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 110K | 282K | 17K | 167K | 234K |
Analyst Outlook
DGICA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DGICA as "Buy", HRTG as "Buy", HCI as "Buy", PLMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.1% upside for HRTG (target: $39) vs -17.2% for HCI (target: $127). For income investors, DGICA offers the higher dividend yield at 4.77% vs HCI's 0.98%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.00 | — | $126.50 | $110.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 9 | — | 14 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.8% | — | — | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 18 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.82 | — | — | $1.50 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
HCI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HRTG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
DGICA vs HRTG vs NODK vs HCI vs PLMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DGICA or HRTG or NODK or HCI or PLMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the stronger pick with 58. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (6. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Donegal Group Inc. (DGICA) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DGICA or HRTG or NODK or HCI or PLMR?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 4. 4x versus Palomar Holdings, Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Palomar Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 12x versus Donegal Group Inc. 's 2. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DGICA or HRTG or NODK or HCI or PLMR?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +201. 4%, compared to -30. 8% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLMR returned +498. 1% versus NODK's -12. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DGICA or HRTG or NODK or HCI or PLMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 24β versus NI Holdings, Inc. 's 0. 57β — meaning NODK is approximately 135% more volatile than PLMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 20% for Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DGICA or HRTG or NODK or HCI or PLMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is pulling ahead at 58. 2% versus -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for NI Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLMR leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DGICA or HRTG or NODK or HCI or PLMR?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus 0. 9% for NI Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus 1. 5% for NODK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLMR leads at 73. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DGICA or HRTG or NODK or HCI or PLMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Palomar Holdings, Inc. (PLMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Donegal Group Inc. 's 2. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Palomar Holdings, Inc. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRTG: 39. 1% to $39. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DGICA or HRTG or NODK or HCI or PLMR?
In this comparison, DGICA (4.
8% yield), HCI (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. HRTG, NODK, PLMR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DGICA or HRTG or NODK or HCI or PLMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 0% yield, +436. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HCI: +436. 8%, NODK: -12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DGICA and HRTG and NODK and HCI and PLMR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DGICA is a small-cap deep-value stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; NODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLMR is a small-cap high-growth stock. DGICA, HCI pay a dividend while HRTG, NODK, PLMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.