Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DNOW vs FAST vs GWW vs MSM vs SNA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
DNOW vs FAST vs GWW vs MSM vs SNA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $1.54B | $50.93B | $58.41B | $5.82B | $19.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.40B | $8.20B | $18.38B | $3.81B | $5.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-141M | $1.26B | $1.78B | $205M | $1.02B |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | 45.0% | 39.2% | 40.7% | 51.3% |
| Operating Margin | -2.5% | 20.2% | 14.2% | 8.4% | 24.7% |
| Forward P/E | 20.7x | 35.9x | 28.3x | 24.0x | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $669M | $442M | $3.16B | $539M | $1.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $164M | $277M | $585M | $56M | $1.62B |
DNOW vs FAST vs GWW vs MSM vs SNA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dnow Inc. (DNOW) | 100 | 175.4 | +75.4% |
| Fastenal Company (FAST) | 100 | 215.0 | +115.0% |
| W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) | 100 | 398.6 | +298.6% |
| MSC Industrial Dire… (MSM) | 100 | 150.4 | +50.4% |
| Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) | 100 | 285.9 | +185.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DNOW vs FAST vs GWW vs MSM vs SNA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DNOW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 18.8% revenue growth vs MSM's -1.3%
FAST has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 8.7%, EPS growth 9.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.69, Low D/E 11.2%, current ratio 4.85x
- Beta 0.69, yield 2.0%, current ratio 4.85x
- Beta 0.69 vs GWW's 0.89, lower leverage
GWW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 463.0% 10Y total return vs FAST's 338.1%
- PEG 1.27 vs FAST's 4.62
- Better valuation composite
MSM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 3.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GWW's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +43.8% vs DNOW's -10.8%
SNA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.4%
- 20.0% margin vs DNOW's -4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% revenue growth vs MSM's -1.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs DNOW's -4.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.69 vs GWW's 0.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs GWW's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.8% vs DNOW's -10.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 24.9% ROA vs DNOW's -5.0%, ROIC 31.2% vs -3.3% |
DNOW vs FAST vs GWW vs MSM vs SNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DNOW vs FAST vs GWW vs MSM vs SNA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SNA leads in 1 of 6 categories
DNOW leads 1 • GWW leads 1 • FAST leads 0 • MSM leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GWW is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 5.4x DNOW's $3.4B. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DNOW's -4.1%. On growth, DNOW holds the edge at +97.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $8.2B | $18.4B | $3.8B | $5.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$44M | $1.8B | $2.8B | $414M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$141M | $1.3B | $1.8B | $205M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $53M | $1.1B | $1.4B | $167M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | +45.0% | +39.2% | +40.7% | +51.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +20.2% | +14.2% | +8.4% | +24.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +15.3% | +9.7% | +5.4% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | +12.8% | +7.5% | +4.4% | +21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.5% | +11.1% | +10.1% | +4.0% | -2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.2% | +13.0% | +18.2% | +12.0% | +4.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DNOW leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, SNA trades at a 53% valuation discount to FAST's 40.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GWW offers better value at 1.56x vs FAST's 5.24x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $50.9B | $58.4B | $5.8B | $19.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $51.1B | $61.0B | $6.3B | $19.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.43x | 40.70x | 34.86x | 29.22x | 19.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.66x | 35.86x | 28.29x | 23.99x | 19.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.24x | 1.56x | — | 1.77x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 30.86x | 20.71x | 15.61x | 13.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 6.21x | 3.26x | 1.54x | 3.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.69x | 12.94x | 14.30x | 4.17x | 3.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.50x | 48.48x | 43.88x | 24.17x | 19.19x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FAST and GWW each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GWW delivers a 43.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $43 in annual profit, vs $-8 for DNOW. FAST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GWW's 0.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GWW scores 8/9 vs DNOW's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.4% | +31.9% | +43.1% | +14.8% | +17.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.0% | +24.9% | +19.7% | +8.2% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.3% | +31.2% | +32.1% | +12.3% | +18.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.9% | +39.7% | +39.7% | +17.5% | +18.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.11x | 0.76x | 0.39x | 0.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $505M | $165M | $2.6B | $483M | -$298M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $164M | $277M | $585M | $56M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $669M | $442M | $3.2B | $539M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 259.39x | 22.63x | 12.56x | 27.12x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GWW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GWW five years ago would be worth $27,320 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,336 for DNOW. Over the past 12 months, MSM leads with a +43.8% total return vs DNOW's -10.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GWW at 22.8% vs MSM's 8.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.2% | +10.9% | +23.2% | +23.5% | +6.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -10.8% | +15.4% | +19.1% | +43.8% | +20.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.3% | +73.1% | +85.3% | +26.0% | +52.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.4% | +81.3% | +173.2% | +28.7% | +61.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.8% | +338.1% | +463.0% | +87.3% | +166.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.4% | +20.1% | +22.8% | +8.0% | +15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FAST and MSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FAST is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GWW's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSM currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs DNOW's 75.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 0.69x | 0.89x | 0.86x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.26 | $50.63 | $1286.56 | $107.09 | $400.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.94 | $38.97 | $906.52 | $74.30 | $301.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.7% | +87.6% | +95.9% | +97.4% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.2 | 46.9 | 58.3 | 68.3 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 7.3M | 239K | 604K | 370K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GWW and MSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DNOW as "Buy", FAST as "Hold", GWW as "Hold", MSM as "Hold", SNA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.1% upside for DNOW (target: $17) vs -6.3% for MSM (target: $98). For income investors, MSM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.25% vs GWW's 0.79%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.00 | $46.57 | $1157.43 | $97.75 | $413.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 31 | 38 | 28 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.0% | +0.8% | +3.3% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 37 | 4 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.87 | $9.73 | $3.39 | $8.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | 0.0% | +1.8% | +0.7% | +1.7% |
SNA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). DNOW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
DNOW vs FAST vs GWW vs MSM vs SNA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DNOW or FAST or GWW or MSM or SNA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dnow Inc.
(DNOW) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 3% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dnow Inc. (DNOW) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DNOW or FAST or GWW or MSM or SNA?
On trailing P/E, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the cheapest at 19.
3x versus Fastenal Company at 40. 7x. On forward P/E, Snap-on Incorporated is actually cheaper at 19. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: W. W. Grainger, Inc. wins at 1. 27x versus Fastenal Company's 4. 62x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DNOW or FAST or GWW or MSM or SNA?
Over the past 5 years, W.
W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) delivered a total return of +173. 2%, compared to +13. 4% for Dnow Inc. (DNOW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GWW returned +463. 0% versus DNOW's -22. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DNOW or FAST or GWW or MSM or SNA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fastenal Company (FAST) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
69β versus W. W. Grainger, Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning GWW is approximately 28% more volatile than FAST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fastenal Company (FAST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 76% for W. W. Grainger, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DNOW or FAST or GWW or MSM or SNA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dnow Inc.
(DNOW) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -1. 3% for MSC Industrial Direct Co. , Inc. (MSM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fastenal Company grew EPS 9. 0% year-over-year, compared to -200. 0% for Dnow Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DNOW leads at 9. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DNOW or FAST or GWW or MSM or SNA?
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus -3. 2% for Dnow Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SNA leads at 25. 8% versus -2. 9% for DNOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SNA leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DNOW or FAST or GWW or MSM or SNA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, W. W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 27x versus Fastenal Company's 4. 62x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) trades at 19. 4x forward P/E versus 35. 9x for Fastenal Company — 16. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DNOW: 30. 1% to $17. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DNOW or FAST or GWW or MSM or SNA?
In this comparison, MSM (3.
3% yield), SNA (2. 4% yield), FAST (2. 0% yield), GWW (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. DNOW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DNOW or FAST or GWW or MSM or SNA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fastenal Company (FAST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
69), 2. 0% yield, +338. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FAST: +338. 1%, DNOW: -22. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DNOW and FAST and GWW and MSM and SNA?
These companies operate in different sectors (DNOW (Energy) and FAST (Industrials) and GWW (Industrials) and MSM (Industrials) and SNA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DNOW is a small-cap high-growth stock; FAST is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GWW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MSM is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. FAST, GWW, MSM, SNA pay a dividend while DNOW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.